TSTP Solution File: SWC030+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SWC030+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 20:13:09 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.58s 2.33s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.58s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 36 ( 22 unt; 2 nHn; 36 RR)
% Number of literals : 64 ( 45 equ; 29 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_195,negated_conjecture,
app(esk53_0,esk52_0) = esk50_0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-chpecy5c/lgb.p',i_0_195) ).
cnf(i_0_199,negated_conjecture,
esk50_0 = esk48_0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-chpecy5c/lgb.p',i_0_199) ).
cnf(i_0_196,negated_conjecture,
app(esk52_0,esk53_0) = esk51_0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-chpecy5c/lgb.p',i_0_196) ).
cnf(i_0_200,negated_conjecture,
esk49_0 = esk51_0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-chpecy5c/lgb.p',i_0_200) ).
cnf(i_0_158,plain,
( nil = X1
| app(X2,X1) != nil
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-chpecy5c/lgb.p',i_0_158) ).
cnf(i_0_197,negated_conjecture,
ssList(esk53_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-chpecy5c/lgb.p',i_0_197) ).
cnf(i_0_198,negated_conjecture,
ssList(esk52_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-chpecy5c/lgb.p',i_0_198) ).
cnf(i_0_157,plain,
( nil = X1
| app(X1,X2) != nil
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-chpecy5c/lgb.p',i_0_157) ).
cnf(i_0_194,negated_conjecture,
( nil = esk48_0
| nil = esk49_0 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-chpecy5c/lgb.p',i_0_194) ).
cnf(i_0_156,plain,
( app(X1,X2) = nil
| nil != X1
| nil != X2
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-chpecy5c/lgb.p',i_0_156) ).
cnf(i_0_44,plain,
ssList(nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-chpecy5c/lgb.p',i_0_44) ).
cnf(i_0_191,negated_conjecture,
( nil != esk48_0
| nil != esk49_0 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-chpecy5c/lgb.p',i_0_191) ).
cnf(c_0_213,negated_conjecture,
app(esk53_0,esk52_0) = esk50_0,
i_0_195 ).
cnf(c_0_214,negated_conjecture,
esk50_0 = esk48_0,
i_0_199 ).
cnf(c_0_215,negated_conjecture,
app(esk52_0,esk53_0) = esk51_0,
i_0_196 ).
cnf(c_0_216,negated_conjecture,
esk49_0 = esk51_0,
i_0_200 ).
cnf(c_0_217,plain,
( nil = X1
| app(X2,X1) != nil
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
i_0_158 ).
cnf(c_0_218,negated_conjecture,
app(esk53_0,esk52_0) = esk48_0,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_213,c_0_214]) ).
cnf(c_0_219,negated_conjecture,
ssList(esk53_0),
i_0_197 ).
cnf(c_0_220,negated_conjecture,
ssList(esk52_0),
i_0_198 ).
cnf(c_0_221,plain,
( nil = X1
| app(X1,X2) != nil
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
i_0_157 ).
cnf(c_0_222,negated_conjecture,
app(esk52_0,esk53_0) = esk49_0,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_215,c_0_216]) ).
cnf(c_0_223,negated_conjecture,
( esk52_0 = nil
| esk48_0 != nil ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_217,c_0_218]),c_0_219]),c_0_220])]) ).
cnf(c_0_224,negated_conjecture,
( nil = esk48_0
| nil = esk49_0 ),
i_0_194 ).
cnf(c_0_225,negated_conjecture,
( esk52_0 = nil
| esk49_0 != nil ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_221,c_0_222]),c_0_219]),c_0_220])]) ).
cnf(c_0_226,negated_conjecture,
( esk53_0 = nil
| esk48_0 != nil ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_221,c_0_218]),c_0_220]),c_0_219])]) ).
cnf(c_0_227,negated_conjecture,
( esk53_0 = nil
| esk49_0 != nil ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_217,c_0_222]),c_0_220]),c_0_219])]) ).
cnf(c_0_228,plain,
( app(X1,X2) = nil
| nil != X1
| nil != X2
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2) ),
i_0_156 ).
cnf(c_0_229,plain,
ssList(nil),
i_0_44 ).
cnf(c_0_230,negated_conjecture,
esk52_0 = nil,
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_223,c_0_224]),c_0_225]) ).
cnf(c_0_231,negated_conjecture,
esk53_0 = nil,
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_226,c_0_224]),c_0_227]) ).
cnf(c_0_232,plain,
app(nil,nil) = nil,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_228])]),c_0_229])]) ).
cnf(c_0_233,negated_conjecture,
( nil != esk48_0
| nil != esk49_0 ),
i_0_191 ).
cnf(c_0_234,negated_conjecture,
esk49_0 = nil,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_222,c_0_230]),c_0_231]),c_0_232]) ).
cnf(c_0_235,negated_conjecture,
esk48_0 != nil,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_233,c_0_234])]) ).
cnf(c_0_236,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_218,c_0_230]),c_0_231]),c_0_232]),c_0_235]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SWC030+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 01:09:23 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.45 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.19/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.19/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.58/2.33 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.58/2.33 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.58/2.33 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.58/2.33 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S
% 7.58/2.33 # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
% 7.58/2.33 #
% 7.58/2.33 # Preprocessing time : 0.024 s
% 7.58/2.33 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.58/2.33
% 7.58/2.33 # Proof found!
% 7.58/2.33 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.58/2.33 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.58/2.33 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.58/2.33
% 7.58/2.33 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.58/2.33 # User time : 0.031 s
% 7.58/2.33 # System time : 0.005 s
% 7.58/2.33 # Total time : 0.036 s
% 7.58/2.33 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.58/2.33
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------