TSTP Solution File: SWC029+1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : SWC029+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:41:07 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.15s 0.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   41 (  15 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  153 (  75 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   24 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  184 (  72   ~;  66   |;  24   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;  20  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   21 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   38 (   0 sgn;  28   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
         => ! [X3] :
              ( ssList(X3)
             => ! [X4] :
                  ( ssList(X4)
                 => ( X2 != X4
                    | X1 != X3
                    | ( nil != X3
                      & nil = X4 )
                    | ( ! [X5] :
                          ( ssItem(X5)
                         => ! [X6] :
                              ( ssList(X6)
                             => ( app(cons(X5,nil),X6) != X4
                                | app(X6,cons(X5,nil)) != X3 ) ) )
                      & neq(X4,nil) )
                    | ( ( nil != X2
                        | nil = X1 )
                      & ( nil != X1
                        | nil = X2 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.pvUIZaAdvo/E---3.1_1373.p',co1) ).

fof(ax15,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
         => ( neq(X1,X2)
          <=> X1 != X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.pvUIZaAdvo/E---3.1_1373.p',ax15) ).

fof(ax83,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
         => ( nil = app(X1,X2)
          <=> ( nil = X2
              & nil = X1 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.pvUIZaAdvo/E---3.1_1373.p',ax83) ).

fof(ax17,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.pvUIZaAdvo/E---3.1_1373.p',ax17) ).

fof(ax16,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssItem(X2)
         => ssList(cons(X2,X1)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.pvUIZaAdvo/E---3.1_1373.p',ax16) ).

fof(ax18,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssItem(X2)
         => cons(X2,X1) != X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.pvUIZaAdvo/E---3.1_1373.p',ax18) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ssList(X1)
       => ! [X2] :
            ( ssList(X2)
           => ! [X3] :
                ( ssList(X3)
               => ! [X4] :
                    ( ssList(X4)
                   => ( X2 != X4
                      | X1 != X3
                      | ( nil != X3
                        & nil = X4 )
                      | ( ! [X5] :
                            ( ssItem(X5)
                           => ! [X6] :
                                ( ssList(X6)
                               => ( app(cons(X5,nil),X6) != X4
                                  | app(X6,cons(X5,nil)) != X3 ) ) )
                        & neq(X4,nil) )
                      | ( ( nil != X2
                          | nil = X1 )
                        & ( nil != X1
                          | nil = X2 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( ssList(esk1_0)
    & ssList(esk2_0)
    & ssList(esk3_0)
    & ssList(esk4_0)
    & esk2_0 = esk4_0
    & esk1_0 = esk3_0
    & ( nil = esk3_0
      | nil != esk4_0 )
    & ( ssItem(esk5_0)
      | ~ neq(esk4_0,nil) )
    & ( ssList(esk6_0)
      | ~ neq(esk4_0,nil) )
    & ( app(cons(esk5_0,nil),esk6_0) = esk4_0
      | ~ neq(esk4_0,nil) )
    & ( app(esk6_0,cons(esk5_0,nil)) = esk3_0
      | ~ neq(esk4_0,nil) )
    & ( nil = esk1_0
      | nil = esk2_0 )
    & ( nil != esk2_0
      | nil = esk2_0 )
    & ( nil = esk1_0
      | nil != esk1_0 )
    & ( nil != esk2_0
      | nil != esk1_0 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil != esk2_0
    | nil != esk1_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    esk2_0 = esk4_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = esk3_0
    | nil != esk4_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    esk1_0 = esk3_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk1_0 != nil
    | esk4_0 != nil ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = esk1_0
    | nil = esk2_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    esk4_0 != nil,
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( app(esk6_0,cons(esk5_0,nil)) = esk3_0
    | ~ neq(esk4_0,nil) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    esk1_0 = nil,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_9]),c_0_14]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X20,X21] :
      ( ( ~ neq(X20,X21)
        | X20 != X21
        | ~ ssList(X21)
        | ~ ssList(X20) )
      & ( X20 = X21
        | neq(X20,X21)
        | ~ ssList(X21)
        | ~ ssList(X20) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax15])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X39,X40] :
      ( ( nil = X40
        | nil != app(X39,X40)
        | ~ ssList(X40)
        | ~ ssList(X39) )
      & ( nil = X39
        | nil != app(X39,X40)
        | ~ ssList(X40)
        | ~ ssList(X39) )
      & ( nil != X40
        | nil != X39
        | nil = app(X39,X40)
        | ~ ssList(X40)
        | ~ ssList(X39) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax83])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( app(esk6_0,cons(esk5_0,nil)) = nil
    | ~ neq(esk4_0,nil) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_11]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | neq(X1,X2)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ssList(nil),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax17]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk4_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( ssList(esk6_0)
    | ~ neq(esk4_0,nil) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( nil = X1
    | nil != app(X1,X2)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    app(esk6_0,cons(esk5_0,nil)) = nil,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]),c_0_23])]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk6_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_21]),c_0_22]),c_0_23])]),c_0_14]) ).

fof(c_0_28,plain,
    ! [X42,X43] :
      ( ~ ssList(X42)
      | ~ ssItem(X43)
      | ssList(cons(X43,X42)) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax16])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( ssItem(esk5_0)
    | ~ neq(esk4_0,nil) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk6_0 = nil
    | ~ ssList(cons(esk5_0,nil)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_27])]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ssList(cons(X2,X1))
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssItem(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ssItem(esk5_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_21]),c_0_22]),c_0_23])]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    esk6_0 = nil,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_22]),c_0_32])]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( nil = X1
    | nil != app(X2,X1)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    app(nil,cons(esk5_0,nil)) = nil,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_33]) ).

fof(c_0_36,plain,
    ! [X44,X45] :
      ( ~ ssList(X44)
      | ~ ssItem(X45)
      | cons(X45,X44) != X44 ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax18])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ( cons(esk5_0,nil) = nil
    | ~ ssList(cons(esk5_0,nil)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_22])]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssItem(X2)
    | cons(X2,X1) != X1 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    cons(esk5_0,nil) = nil,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_31]),c_0_22]),c_0_32])]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]),c_0_22]),c_0_32])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.10  % Problem    : SWC029+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.02/0.11  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.31  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.11/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.31  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 02:08:48 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.42  Running first-order model finding
% 0.15/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.pvUIZaAdvo/E---3.1_1373.p
% 0.15/0.44  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.15/0.44  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.44  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.44  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.44  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44  # new_bool_3 with pid 1452 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.44  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.15/0.44  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.44  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.44  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.44  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.44  # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.44  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.44  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2v with 163s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2v with pid 1458 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.44  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2v
% 0.15/0.44  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.44  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.44  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.44  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.44  # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.44  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.44  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2v with 163s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.44  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.44  
% 0.15/0.44  # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.44  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.15/0.44  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.44  # Parsed axioms                        : 96
% 0.15/0.44  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 77
% 0.15/0.44  # Initial clauses                      : 42
% 0.15/0.44  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 0.15/0.44  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 40
% 0.15/0.44  # Processed clauses                    : 84
% 0.15/0.44  # ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 0.15/0.44  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.15/0.44  # ...remaining for further processing  : 82
% 0.15/0.44  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 8
% 0.15/0.44  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.15/0.44  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.15/0.44  # Backward-rewritten                   : 12
% 0.15/0.44  # Generated clauses                    : 61
% 0.15/0.44  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 47
% 0.15/0.44  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.15/0.44  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.15/0.44  # Paramodulations                      : 52
% 0.15/0.44  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.15/0.44  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.15/0.44  # Equation resolutions                 : 10
% 0.15/0.44  # Total rewrite steps                  : 74
% 0.15/0.44  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.15/0.44  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.15/0.44  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.44  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.15/0.44  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.44  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.15/0.44  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.15/0.44  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.15/0.44  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.15/0.44  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.15/0.44  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.15/0.44  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.15/0.44  # Current number of processed clauses  : 30
% 0.15/0.44  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 11
% 0.15/0.44  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.44  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.15/0.44  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 17
% 0.15/0.44  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 35
% 0.15/0.44  # ...number of literals in the above   : 140
% 0.15/0.44  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.15/0.44  # Current number of archived clauses   : 49
% 0.15/0.44  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 101
% 0.15/0.44  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 42
% 0.15/0.44  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
% 0.15/0.44  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13
% 0.15/0.44  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.15/0.44  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 6
% 0.15/0.44  # BW rewrite match successes           : 6
% 0.15/0.44  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.15/0.44  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.15/0.44  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 4368
% 0.15/0.44  
% 0.15/0.44  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.44  # User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.44  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.44  # Total time               : 0.008 s
% 0.15/0.44  # Maximum resident set size: 1904 pages
% 0.15/0.44  
% 0.15/0.44  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.44  # User time                : 0.008 s
% 0.15/0.44  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.44  # Total time               : 0.013 s
% 0.15/0.44  # Maximum resident set size: 1800 pages
% 0.15/0.44  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------