TSTP Solution File: SWC025-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWC025-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 21:58:56 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 0.91s 1.17s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13 % Problem : SWC025-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 03:54:56 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.45 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.21/0.45 The process was started by sandbox on n018.cluster.edu,
% 0.21/0.45 Sun Jun 12 03:54:56 2022
% 0.21/0.45 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 23164.
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.21/0.45 set(auto).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.21/0.45 clear(print_given).
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 list(usable).
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.21/0.45 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.21/0.45 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.21/0.45 clauses in usable.
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 ------------> process usable:
% 0.21/0.45 Following clause subsumed by 23 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssList(tl(A))|nil=A.
% 0.21/0.45 Following clause subsumed by 24 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssItem(hd(A))|nil=A.
% 0.21/0.45 Following clause subsumed by 67 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -leq(A,B)| -ssItem(B)| -ssItem(A)|lt(A,B)|A=B.
% 0.21/0.45 139 back subsumes 138.
% 0.21/0.45 149 back subsumes 143.
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 ------------> process sos:
% 0.21/0.45 Following clause subsumed by 432 during input processing: 0 [copy,432,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.21/0.45 432 back subsumes 336.
% 0.21/0.45 432 back subsumes 280.
% 0.21/0.45 432 back subsumes 279.
% 0.21/0.45 432 back subsumes 278.
% 0.21/0.45 432 back subsumes 268.
% 0.21/0.45 432 back subsumes 255.
% 0.21/0.45 432 back subsumes 254.
% 0.21/0.45 432 back subsumes 253.
% 0.21/0.45 432 back subsumes 216.
% 0.21/0.45 432 back subsumes 204.
% 0.21/0.45 432 back subsumes 203.
% 0.21/0.45 432 back subsumes 202.
% 0.21/0.45 432 back subsumes 201.
% 0.21/0.45 432 back subsumes 184.
% 0.21/0.45 432 back subsumes 181.
% 0.21/0.45 432 back subsumes 179.
% 0.21/0.45 432 back subsumes 175.
% 0.21/0.45 432 back subsumes 172.
% 0.21/0.45 432 back subsumes 149.
% 0.21/0.45 432 back subsumes 148.
% 0.21/0.45 432 back subsumes 147.
% 0.21/0.45 432 back subsumes 146.
% 0.21/0.45 432 back subsumes 145.
% 0.21/0.45 432 back subsumes 137.
% 0.21/0.45 432 back subsumes 136.
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.48/0.65
% 0.48/0.65 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.48/0.65
% 0.48/0.65 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.48/0.65
% 0.48/0.65
% 0.48/0.65 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.48/0.65
% 0.48/0.65 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.48/0.65 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.48/0.65 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.48/0.65 number of clauses in intial UL: 335
% 0.48/0.65 number of clauses initially in problem: 398
% 0.48/0.65 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 84
% 0.48/0.65 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 97
% 0.48/0.65 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.48/0.65 absolute distinct symbol count: 73
% 0.48/0.65 distinct predicate count: 20
% 0.48/0.65 distinct function count: 46
% 0.48/0.65 distinct constant count: 7
% 0.48/0.65
% 0.48/0.65 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.48/0.65
% 0.48/0.65
% 0.48/0.65
% 0.48/0.65 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.48/0.65
% 0.48/0.65 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.91/1.16
% 0.91/1.16 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.91/1.16
% 0.91/1.16 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.91/1.16
% 0.91/1.16 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.91/1.16
% 0.91/1.16 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.91/1.16
% 0.91/1.16 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.91/1.16
% 0.91/1.16 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.91/1.16
% 0.91/1.16 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.91/1.16
% 0.91/1.16 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.91/1.16 cons(skac3,app(nil,nil))=app(cons(skac3,nil),nil).
% 0.91/1.16
% 0.91/1.16 ------------- memory usage ------------
% 0.91/1.16 39 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 1245.4 K.
% 0.91/1.16 type (bytes each) gets frees in use avail bytes
% 0.91/1.16 sym_ent ( 304) 180 0 180 0 53.4 K
% 0.91/1.16 term ( 32) 80814 75198 5616 12 175.9 K
% 0.91/1.16 rel ( 40) 58265 52235 6030 10 235.9 K
% 0.91/1.16 term_ptr ( 16) 23249 2038 21211 33 331.9 K
% 0.91/1.16 formula_ptr_2 ( 56) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.91/1.16 fpa_head ( 24) 1934 49 1885 10 44.4 K
% 0.91/1.16 fpa_tree ( 56) 11125 11125 0 20 1.1 K
% 0.91/1.16 context (1288) 16964 16964 0 11 13.8 K
% 0.91/1.16 trail ( 24) 97158 97158 0 6 0.1 K
% 0.91/1.16 imd_tree ( 32) 38 9 29 9 1.2 K
% 0.91/1.16 imd_pos (4024) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.91/1.16 is_tree ( 24) 1368 78 1290 20 30.7 K
% 0.91/1.16 is_pos (2424) 61785 61785 0 6 14.2 K
% 0.91/1.16 fsub_pos ( 16) 8710 8710 0 1 0.0 K
% 0.91/1.16 literal ( 32) 19366 15564 3802 2 118.9 K
% 0.91/1.16 clause ( 88) 3506 2579 927 1 79.8 K
% 0.91/1.16 list ( 272) 10 3 7 1 2.1 K
% 0.91/1.16 clash_nd ( 80) 5977 5977 0 9 0.7 K
% 0.91/1.16 clause_ptr ( 16) 834 82 752 3 11.8 K
% 0.91/1.16 int_ptr ( 16) 7813 3993 3820 5 59.8 K
% 0.91/1.16 ci_ptr ( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.91/1.16 link_node ( 120) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.91/1.16 ans_lit_node( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.91/1.16 formula_box( 168) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.91/1.16 formula( 40) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.91/1.16 formula_ptr( 16) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.91/1.16 cl_attribute( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.91/1.16
% 0.91/1.16 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
% 0.91/1.16 me 0.00
% 0.91/1.16 forward subsume 0.00
% 0.91/1.16 delete cl time 0.00
% 0.91/1.16 keep cl time 0.00
% 0.91/1.16 hints time 0.00
% 0.91/1.16 print_cl time 0.00
% 0.91/1.16 conflict time 0.00
% 0.91/1.16 new demod time 0.00
% 0.91/1.16 post_process time 0.00
% 0.91/1.16 back demod time 0.00
% 0.91/1.16 back subsume 0.00
% 0.91/1.16 factor time 0.00
% 0.91/1.16 FINDER time 0.00
% 0.91/1.16 unindex time 0.00
% 0.91/1.16
% 0.91/1.16 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.91/1.16
% 0.91/1.16 true clauses given 1 (12.5%)
% 0.91/1.16 false clauses given 7
% 0.91/1.16
% 0.91/1.16 FALSE TRUE
% 0.91/1.16 2 2 3
% 0.91/1.16 3 30 15
% 0.91/1.16 4 6 14
% 0.91/1.16 6 0 1
% 0.91/1.16 7 0 29
% 0.91/1.16 8 1 1
% 0.91/1.16 9 0 12
% 0.91/1.16 10 0 2
% 0.91/1.16 11 0 45
% 0.91/1.16 12 0 21
% 0.91/1.16 13 0 33
% 0.91/1.16 14 0 8
% 0.91/1.16 15 0 26
% 0.91/1.16 16 0 13
% 0.91/1.16 17 0 12
% 0.91/1.16 19 0 5
% 0.91/1.16 21 0 15
% 0.91/1.16 22 0 12
% 0.91/1.16 23 0 5
% 0.91/1.16 tot: 39 272 (87.5% true)
% 0.91/1.16
% 0.91/1.16
% 0.91/1.16 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.91/1.16
% 0.91/1.16 Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 0.91/1.16 1:0 2:0 3:2 4:0 5:11 6:0 7:4 8:0 9:6 10:47
% 0.91/1.16 11:6 12:0 13:0 14:0 15:0 16:0 17:0 18:0 19:0 20:1
% 0.91/1.16 21:0 22:0 23:1 24:1 25:0 26:0 27:0 28:0 29:0 30:0
% 0.91/1.16 31:0 32:0 33:0 34:0 35:0 36:0 37:0 38:0 39:0 40:0
% 0.91/1.16 41:0 42:0 43:0 44:0 45:0 46:0 47:0 48:0 49:0 50:0
% 0.91/1.16 51:0 52:0 53:0 54:0 55:0 56:1 57:0 58:0 59:0 60:1
% 0.91/1.16 61:0 62:0 63:0 64:0 65:0 66:0 67:1 68:0 69:0 70:0
% 0.91/1.16 71:0 72:0 73:0 74:0 75:0 76:0 77:0 78:0 79:0 80:0
% 0.91/1.16 81:0 82:0 83:0 84:0 85:0 86:0 87:0 88:0 89:0 90:0
% 0.91/1.16 91:0 92:0 93:0 94:0 95:0 96:0 97:0 98:0 99:0
% 0.91/1.16 All others: 575.
% 0.91/1.16
% 0.91/1.16 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 0.91/1.16
% 0.91/1.16 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------