TSTP Solution File: SWC020+1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SWC020+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed May  1 03:59:14 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.59s 0.75s
% Output   : Refutation 0.59s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   41 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  265 (  90 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   32 (   6 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  336 ( 112   ~;  99   |; 108   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;  13  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   7 usr;   5 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   50 (  24   !;  26   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f213,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f165,f170,f175,f176,f177,f212]) ).

fof(f212,plain,
    ( ~ spl5_2
    | ~ spl5_4 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f211]) ).

fof(f211,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl5_2
    | ~ spl5_4 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f210,f126]) ).

fof(f126,plain,
    ssList(sK2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f117]) ).

fof(f117,plain,
    ( ( ( frontsegP(sK3,sK2)
        & neq(sK2,nil) )
      | ( nil = sK2
        & nil = sK3 ) )
    & ( nil != sK0
      | nil != sK1 )
    & ! [X4] :
        ( ~ frontsegP(sK0,X4)
        | ~ frontsegP(sK1,X4)
        | ~ neq(X4,nil)
        | ~ ssList(X4) )
    & sK0 = sK2
    & sK1 = sK3
    & ssList(sK3)
    & ssList(sK2)
    & ssList(sK1)
    & ssList(sK0) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f101,f116,f115,f114,f113]) ).

fof(f113,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
        ( ? [X1] :
            ( ? [X2] :
                ( ? [X3] :
                    ( ( ( frontsegP(X3,X2)
                        & neq(X2,nil) )
                      | ( nil = X2
                        & nil = X3 ) )
                    & ( nil != X0
                      | nil != X1 )
                    & ! [X4] :
                        ( ~ frontsegP(X0,X4)
                        | ~ frontsegP(X1,X4)
                        | ~ neq(X4,nil)
                        | ~ ssList(X4) )
                    & X0 = X2
                    & X1 = X3
                    & ssList(X3) )
                & ssList(X2) )
            & ssList(X1) )
        & ssList(X0) )
   => ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( ( ( frontsegP(X3,X2)
                      & neq(X2,nil) )
                    | ( nil = X2
                      & nil = X3 ) )
                  & ( nil != sK0
                    | nil != X1 )
                  & ! [X4] :
                      ( ~ frontsegP(sK0,X4)
                      | ~ frontsegP(X1,X4)
                      | ~ neq(X4,nil)
                      | ~ ssList(X4) )
                  & sK0 = X2
                  & X1 = X3
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(sK0) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f114,plain,
    ( ? [X1] :
        ( ? [X2] :
            ( ? [X3] :
                ( ( ( frontsegP(X3,X2)
                    & neq(X2,nil) )
                  | ( nil = X2
                    & nil = X3 ) )
                & ( nil != sK0
                  | nil != X1 )
                & ! [X4] :
                    ( ~ frontsegP(sK0,X4)
                    | ~ frontsegP(X1,X4)
                    | ~ neq(X4,nil)
                    | ~ ssList(X4) )
                & sK0 = X2
                & X1 = X3
                & ssList(X3) )
            & ssList(X2) )
        & ssList(X1) )
   => ( ? [X2] :
          ( ? [X3] :
              ( ( ( frontsegP(X3,X2)
                  & neq(X2,nil) )
                | ( nil = X2
                  & nil = X3 ) )
              & ( nil != sK0
                | nil != sK1 )
              & ! [X4] :
                  ( ~ frontsegP(sK0,X4)
                  | ~ frontsegP(sK1,X4)
                  | ~ neq(X4,nil)
                  | ~ ssList(X4) )
              & sK0 = X2
              & sK1 = X3
              & ssList(X3) )
          & ssList(X2) )
      & ssList(sK1) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f115,plain,
    ( ? [X2] :
        ( ? [X3] :
            ( ( ( frontsegP(X3,X2)
                & neq(X2,nil) )
              | ( nil = X2
                & nil = X3 ) )
            & ( nil != sK0
              | nil != sK1 )
            & ! [X4] :
                ( ~ frontsegP(sK0,X4)
                | ~ frontsegP(sK1,X4)
                | ~ neq(X4,nil)
                | ~ ssList(X4) )
            & sK0 = X2
            & sK1 = X3
            & ssList(X3) )
        & ssList(X2) )
   => ( ? [X3] :
          ( ( ( frontsegP(X3,sK2)
              & neq(sK2,nil) )
            | ( nil = sK2
              & nil = X3 ) )
          & ( nil != sK0
            | nil != sK1 )
          & ! [X4] :
              ( ~ frontsegP(sK0,X4)
              | ~ frontsegP(sK1,X4)
              | ~ neq(X4,nil)
              | ~ ssList(X4) )
          & sK0 = sK2
          & sK1 = X3
          & ssList(X3) )
      & ssList(sK2) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f116,plain,
    ( ? [X3] :
        ( ( ( frontsegP(X3,sK2)
            & neq(sK2,nil) )
          | ( nil = sK2
            & nil = X3 ) )
        & ( nil != sK0
          | nil != sK1 )
        & ! [X4] :
            ( ~ frontsegP(sK0,X4)
            | ~ frontsegP(sK1,X4)
            | ~ neq(X4,nil)
            | ~ ssList(X4) )
        & sK0 = sK2
        & sK1 = X3
        & ssList(X3) )
   => ( ( ( frontsegP(sK3,sK2)
          & neq(sK2,nil) )
        | ( nil = sK2
          & nil = sK3 ) )
      & ( nil != sK0
        | nil != sK1 )
      & ! [X4] :
          ( ~ frontsegP(sK0,X4)
          | ~ frontsegP(sK1,X4)
          | ~ neq(X4,nil)
          | ~ ssList(X4) )
      & sK0 = sK2
      & sK1 = sK3
      & ssList(sK3) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f101,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( ( ( frontsegP(X3,X2)
                      & neq(X2,nil) )
                    | ( nil = X2
                      & nil = X3 ) )
                  & ( nil != X0
                    | nil != X1 )
                  & ! [X4] :
                      ( ~ frontsegP(X0,X4)
                      | ~ frontsegP(X1,X4)
                      | ~ neq(X4,nil)
                      | ~ ssList(X4) )
                  & X0 = X2
                  & X1 = X3
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(X0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f100]) ).

fof(f100,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( ( ( frontsegP(X3,X2)
                      & neq(X2,nil) )
                    | ( nil = X2
                      & nil = X3 ) )
                  & ( nil != X0
                    | nil != X1 )
                  & ! [X4] :
                      ( ~ frontsegP(X0,X4)
                      | ~ frontsegP(X1,X4)
                      | ~ neq(X4,nil)
                      | ~ ssList(X4) )
                  & X0 = X2
                  & X1 = X3
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).

fof(f97,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( ssList(X0)
       => ! [X1] :
            ( ssList(X1)
           => ! [X2] :
                ( ssList(X2)
               => ! [X3] :
                    ( ssList(X3)
                   => ( ( ( ~ frontsegP(X3,X2)
                          | ~ neq(X2,nil) )
                        & ( nil != X2
                          | nil != X3 ) )
                      | ( nil = X0
                        & nil = X1 )
                      | ? [X4] :
                          ( frontsegP(X0,X4)
                          & frontsegP(X1,X4)
                          & neq(X4,nil)
                          & ssList(X4) )
                      | X0 != X2
                      | X1 != X3 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f96]) ).

fof(f96,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
         => ! [X2] :
              ( ssList(X2)
             => ! [X3] :
                  ( ssList(X3)
                 => ( ( ( ~ frontsegP(X3,X2)
                        | ~ neq(X2,nil) )
                      & ( nil != X2
                        | nil != X3 ) )
                    | ( nil = X0
                      & nil = X1 )
                    | ? [X4] :
                        ( frontsegP(X0,X4)
                        & frontsegP(X1,X4)
                        & neq(X4,nil)
                        & ssList(X4) )
                    | X0 != X2
                    | X1 != X3 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9gkoLxqt3I/Vampire---4.8_9599',co1) ).

fof(f210,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(sK2)
    | ~ spl5_2
    | ~ spl5_4 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f209,f182]) ).

fof(f182,plain,
    frontsegP(sK2,sK2),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f126,f143]) ).

fof(f143,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( frontsegP(X0,X0)
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f107]) ).

fof(f107,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( frontsegP(X0,X0)
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f42]) ).

fof(f42,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => frontsegP(X0,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9gkoLxqt3I/Vampire---4.8_9599',ax42) ).

fof(f209,plain,
    ( ~ frontsegP(sK2,sK2)
    | ~ ssList(sK2)
    | ~ spl5_2
    | ~ spl5_4 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f199,f164]) ).

fof(f164,plain,
    ( frontsegP(sK3,sK2)
    | ~ spl5_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f162]) ).

fof(f162,plain,
    ( spl5_2
  <=> frontsegP(sK3,sK2) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl5_2])]) ).

fof(f199,plain,
    ( ~ frontsegP(sK3,sK2)
    | ~ frontsegP(sK2,sK2)
    | ~ ssList(sK2)
    | ~ spl5_4 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f150,f174]) ).

fof(f174,plain,
    ( neq(sK2,nil)
    | ~ spl5_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f172]) ).

fof(f172,plain,
    ( spl5_4
  <=> neq(sK2,nil) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl5_4])]) ).

fof(f150,plain,
    ! [X4] :
      ( ~ neq(X4,nil)
      | ~ frontsegP(sK3,X4)
      | ~ frontsegP(sK2,X4)
      | ~ ssList(X4) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f130,f129,f128]) ).

fof(f128,plain,
    sK1 = sK3,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f117]) ).

fof(f129,plain,
    sK0 = sK2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f117]) ).

fof(f130,plain,
    ! [X4] :
      ( ~ frontsegP(sK0,X4)
      | ~ frontsegP(sK1,X4)
      | ~ neq(X4,nil)
      | ~ ssList(X4) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f117]) ).

fof(f177,plain,
    ( ~ spl5_3
    | ~ spl5_1 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f149,f158,f167]) ).

fof(f167,plain,
    ( spl5_3
  <=> nil = sK3 ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl5_3])]) ).

fof(f158,plain,
    ( spl5_1
  <=> nil = sK2 ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl5_1])]) ).

fof(f149,plain,
    ( nil != sK2
    | nil != sK3 ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f131,f129,f128]) ).

fof(f131,plain,
    ( nil != sK0
    | nil != sK1 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f117]) ).

fof(f176,plain,
    ( spl5_3
    | spl5_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f132,f172,f167]) ).

fof(f132,plain,
    ( neq(sK2,nil)
    | nil = sK3 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f117]) ).

fof(f175,plain,
    ( spl5_1
    | spl5_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f133,f172,f158]) ).

fof(f133,plain,
    ( neq(sK2,nil)
    | nil = sK2 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f117]) ).

fof(f170,plain,
    ( spl5_3
    | spl5_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f134,f162,f167]) ).

fof(f134,plain,
    ( frontsegP(sK3,sK2)
    | nil = sK3 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f117]) ).

fof(f165,plain,
    ( spl5_1
    | spl5_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f135,f162,f158]) ).

fof(f135,plain,
    ( frontsegP(sK3,sK2)
    | nil = sK2 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f117]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : SWC020+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Tue Apr 30 18:48:03 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.35  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.14/0.35  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9gkoLxqt3I/Vampire---4.8_9599
% 0.52/0.74  % (9842)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.52/0.74  % (9836)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.52/0.74  % (9838)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.52/0.74  % (9839)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.52/0.74  % (9837)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.52/0.74  % (9840)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.52/0.74  % (9841)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.52/0.75  % (9843)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.52/0.75  % (9839)First to succeed.
% 0.59/0.75  % (9836)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.59/0.75  % (9838)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.59/0.75  % (9839)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.59/0.75  % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.59/0.75  % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.59/0.75  % (9839)------------------------------
% 0.59/0.75  % (9839)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.59/0.75  % (9839)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.59/0.75  
% 0.59/0.75  % (9839)Memory used [KB]: 1153
% 0.59/0.75  % (9839)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.59/0.75  % (9839)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 0.59/0.75  % (9839)------------------------------
% 0.59/0.75  % (9839)------------------------------
% 0.59/0.75  % (9832)Success in time 0.388 s
% 0.59/0.75  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------