TSTP Solution File: SWC019+1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SWC019+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May 5 09:48:00 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.60s 0.79s
% Output : Refutation 0.60s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 33 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 208 ( 79 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 26 ( 6 avg)
% Number of connectives : 277 ( 102 ~; 73 |; 85 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 15 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 16 ( 6 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 59 ( 33 !; 26 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f172,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f171,f166]) ).
fof(f166,plain,
~ neq(sK3,nil),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f127,f161,f156]) ).
fof(f156,plain,
! [X4] :
( ~ neq(X4,nil)
| ~ frontsegP(sK3,X4)
| ~ ssList(X4) ),
inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f148]) ).
fof(f148,plain,
! [X4] :
( ~ frontsegP(sK3,X4)
| ~ frontsegP(sK3,X4)
| ~ neq(X4,nil)
| ~ ssList(X4) ),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f131,f146,f128]) ).
fof(f128,plain,
sK1 = sK3,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f117]) ).
fof(f117,plain,
( ( nil != sK0
| nil != sK1 )
& ! [X4] :
( ~ frontsegP(sK0,X4)
| ~ frontsegP(sK1,X4)
| ~ neq(X4,nil)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& sK2 = sK3
& sK0 = sK2
& sK1 = sK3
& ssList(sK3)
& ssList(sK2)
& ssList(sK1)
& ssList(sK0) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f101,f116,f115,f114,f113]) ).
fof(f113,plain,
( ? [X0] :
( ? [X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ( nil != X0
| nil != X1 )
& ! [X4] :
( ~ frontsegP(X0,X4)
| ~ frontsegP(X1,X4)
| ~ neq(X4,nil)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& X2 = X3
& X0 = X2
& X1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
& ssList(X1) )
& ssList(X0) )
=> ( ? [X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ( nil != sK0
| nil != X1 )
& ! [X4] :
( ~ frontsegP(sK0,X4)
| ~ frontsegP(X1,X4)
| ~ neq(X4,nil)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& X2 = X3
& sK0 = X2
& X1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
& ssList(X1) )
& ssList(sK0) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f114,plain,
( ? [X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ( nil != sK0
| nil != X1 )
& ! [X4] :
( ~ frontsegP(sK0,X4)
| ~ frontsegP(X1,X4)
| ~ neq(X4,nil)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& X2 = X3
& sK0 = X2
& X1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
& ssList(X1) )
=> ( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ( nil != sK0
| nil != sK1 )
& ! [X4] :
( ~ frontsegP(sK0,X4)
| ~ frontsegP(sK1,X4)
| ~ neq(X4,nil)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& X2 = X3
& sK0 = X2
& sK1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
& ssList(sK1) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f115,plain,
( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ( nil != sK0
| nil != sK1 )
& ! [X4] :
( ~ frontsegP(sK0,X4)
| ~ frontsegP(sK1,X4)
| ~ neq(X4,nil)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& X2 = X3
& sK0 = X2
& sK1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
=> ( ? [X3] :
( ( nil != sK0
| nil != sK1 )
& ! [X4] :
( ~ frontsegP(sK0,X4)
| ~ frontsegP(sK1,X4)
| ~ neq(X4,nil)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& sK2 = X3
& sK0 = sK2
& sK1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(sK2) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f116,plain,
( ? [X3] :
( ( nil != sK0
| nil != sK1 )
& ! [X4] :
( ~ frontsegP(sK0,X4)
| ~ frontsegP(sK1,X4)
| ~ neq(X4,nil)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& sK2 = X3
& sK0 = sK2
& sK1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
=> ( ( nil != sK0
| nil != sK1 )
& ! [X4] :
( ~ frontsegP(sK0,X4)
| ~ frontsegP(sK1,X4)
| ~ neq(X4,nil)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& sK2 = sK3
& sK0 = sK2
& sK1 = sK3
& ssList(sK3) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f101,plain,
? [X0] :
( ? [X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ( nil != X0
| nil != X1 )
& ! [X4] :
( ~ frontsegP(X0,X4)
| ~ frontsegP(X1,X4)
| ~ neq(X4,nil)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& X2 = X3
& X0 = X2
& X1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
& ssList(X1) )
& ssList(X0) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f100]) ).
fof(f100,plain,
? [X0] :
( ? [X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ( nil != X0
| nil != X1 )
& ! [X4] :
( ~ frontsegP(X0,X4)
| ~ frontsegP(X1,X4)
| ~ neq(X4,nil)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& X2 = X3
& X0 = X2
& X1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
& ssList(X1) )
& ssList(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).
fof(f97,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0] :
( ssList(X0)
=> ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ( ( nil = X0
& nil = X1 )
| ? [X4] :
( frontsegP(X0,X4)
& frontsegP(X1,X4)
& neq(X4,nil)
& ssList(X4) )
| X2 != X3
| X0 != X2
| X1 != X3 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f96]) ).
fof(f96,conjecture,
! [X0] :
( ssList(X0)
=> ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ( ( nil = X0
& nil = X1 )
| ? [X4] :
( frontsegP(X0,X4)
& frontsegP(X1,X4)
& neq(X4,nil)
& ssList(X4) )
| X2 != X3
| X0 != X2
| X1 != X3 ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.lN3bqIVwVc/Vampire---4.8_9783',co1) ).
fof(f146,plain,
sK0 = sK3,
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f129,f130]) ).
fof(f130,plain,
sK2 = sK3,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f117]) ).
fof(f129,plain,
sK0 = sK2,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f117]) ).
fof(f131,plain,
! [X4] :
( ~ frontsegP(sK0,X4)
| ~ frontsegP(sK1,X4)
| ~ neq(X4,nil)
| ~ ssList(X4) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f117]) ).
fof(f161,plain,
frontsegP(sK3,sK3),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f127,f140]) ).
fof(f140,plain,
! [X0] :
( frontsegP(X0,X0)
| ~ ssList(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f107]) ).
fof(f107,plain,
! [X0] :
( frontsegP(X0,X0)
| ~ ssList(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f42]) ).
fof(f42,axiom,
! [X0] :
( ssList(X0)
=> frontsegP(X0,X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.lN3bqIVwVc/Vampire---4.8_9783',ax42) ).
fof(f127,plain,
ssList(sK3),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f117]) ).
fof(f171,plain,
neq(sK3,nil),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f127,f135,f157,f134]) ).
fof(f134,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( X0 = X1
| neq(X0,X1)
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssList(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f118]) ).
fof(f118,plain,
! [X0] :
( ! [X1] :
( ( ( neq(X0,X1)
| X0 = X1 )
& ( X0 != X1
| ~ neq(X0,X1) ) )
| ~ ssList(X1) )
| ~ ssList(X0) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f102]) ).
fof(f102,plain,
! [X0] :
( ! [X1] :
( ( neq(X0,X1)
<=> X0 != X1 )
| ~ ssList(X1) )
| ~ ssList(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).
fof(f15,axiom,
! [X0] :
( ssList(X0)
=> ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ( neq(X0,X1)
<=> X0 != X1 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.lN3bqIVwVc/Vampire---4.8_9783',ax15) ).
fof(f157,plain,
nil != sK3,
inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f147]) ).
fof(f147,plain,
( nil != sK3
| nil != sK3 ),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f132,f146,f128]) ).
fof(f132,plain,
( nil != sK0
| nil != sK1 ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f117]) ).
fof(f135,plain,
ssList(nil),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).
fof(f17,axiom,
ssList(nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.lN3bqIVwVc/Vampire---4.8_9783',ax17) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : SWC019+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.13/0.15 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.16/0.37 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.37 % DateTime : Fri May 3 20:35:38 EDT 2024
% 0.16/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.37 This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.16/0.37 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.lN3bqIVwVc/Vampire---4.8_9783
% 0.60/0.78 % (9958)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.60/0.78 % (9955)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.60/0.78 % (9953)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/78Mi)
% 0.60/0.78 % (9954)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.60/0.78 % (9956)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/45Mi)
% 0.60/0.78 % (9952)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.60/0.78 % (9951)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.60/0.78 % (9957)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 0.60/0.79 % (9954)First to succeed.
% 0.60/0.79 % (9956)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.60/0.79 % (9954)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-9950"
% 0.60/0.79 % (9954)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.60/0.79 % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.60/0.79 % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.60/0.79 % (9954)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.79 % (9954)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.60/0.79 % (9954)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.60/0.79
% 0.60/0.79 % (9954)Memory used [KB]: 1144
% 0.60/0.79 % (9954)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.60/0.79 % (9954)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.60/0.79 % (9950)Success in time 0.412 s
% 0.60/0.79 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------