TSTP Solution File: SWC019+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SWC019+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 20:13:06 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.35s 2.37s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.35s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 24 ( 15 unt; 2 nHn; 24 RR)
% Number of literals : 42 ( 15 equ; 23 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_193,negated_conjecture,
esk50_0 = esk51_0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-66hvxcwm/lgb.p',i_0_193) ).
cnf(i_0_195,negated_conjecture,
esk49_0 = esk51_0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-66hvxcwm/lgb.p',i_0_195) ).
cnf(i_0_194,negated_conjecture,
esk50_0 = esk48_0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-66hvxcwm/lgb.p',i_0_194) ).
cnf(i_0_192,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ neq(X1,nil)
| ~ frontsegP(esk48_0,X1)
| ~ frontsegP(esk49_0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-66hvxcwm/lgb.p',i_0_192) ).
cnf(i_0_87,plain,
( frontsegP(X1,X1)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-66hvxcwm/lgb.p',i_0_87) ).
cnf(i_0_198,negated_conjecture,
ssList(esk49_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-66hvxcwm/lgb.p',i_0_198) ).
cnf(i_0_191,negated_conjecture,
( nil != esk48_0
| nil != esk49_0 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-66hvxcwm/lgb.p',i_0_191) ).
cnf(i_0_41,plain,
( X1 = X2
| neq(X1,X2)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-66hvxcwm/lgb.p',i_0_41) ).
cnf(i_0_44,plain,
ssList(nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-66hvxcwm/lgb.p',i_0_44) ).
cnf(c_0_208,negated_conjecture,
esk50_0 = esk51_0,
i_0_193 ).
cnf(c_0_209,negated_conjecture,
esk49_0 = esk51_0,
i_0_195 ).
cnf(c_0_210,negated_conjecture,
esk50_0 = esk48_0,
i_0_194 ).
cnf(c_0_211,negated_conjecture,
esk50_0 = esk49_0,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_208,c_0_209]) ).
cnf(c_0_212,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ neq(X1,nil)
| ~ frontsegP(esk48_0,X1)
| ~ frontsegP(esk49_0,X1) ),
i_0_192 ).
cnf(c_0_213,negated_conjecture,
esk48_0 = esk49_0,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_210,c_0_211]) ).
cnf(c_0_214,negated_conjecture,
( ~ frontsegP(esk49_0,X1)
| ~ neq(X1,nil)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_212,c_0_213])]) ).
cnf(c_0_215,plain,
( frontsegP(X1,X1)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
i_0_87 ).
cnf(c_0_216,negated_conjecture,
ssList(esk49_0),
i_0_198 ).
cnf(c_0_217,negated_conjecture,
( nil != esk48_0
| nil != esk49_0 ),
i_0_191 ).
cnf(c_0_218,negated_conjecture,
~ neq(esk49_0,nil),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_214,c_0_215]),c_0_216])]) ).
cnf(c_0_219,plain,
( X1 = X2
| neq(X1,X2)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
i_0_41 ).
cnf(c_0_220,plain,
ssList(nil),
i_0_44 ).
cnf(c_0_221,negated_conjecture,
esk49_0 != nil,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_217,c_0_213])]) ).
cnf(c_0_222,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_218,c_0_219]),c_0_220]),c_0_216])]),c_0_221]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWC019+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 22:14:40 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.46 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.35/2.37 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.35/2.37 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.35/2.37 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.35/2.37 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S068N
% 7.35/2.37 # and selection function PSelectNewComplexAHP.
% 7.35/2.37 #
% 7.35/2.37 # Preprocessing time : 0.013 s
% 7.35/2.37 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.35/2.37
% 7.35/2.37 # Proof found!
% 7.35/2.37 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.35/2.37 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.35/2.37 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.35/2.37
% 7.35/2.37 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.35/2.37 # User time : 0.015 s
% 7.35/2.37 # System time : 0.007 s
% 7.35/2.37 # Total time : 0.021 s
% 7.35/2.37 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.35/2.37
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------