TSTP Solution File: SWC013-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWC013-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 21:58:52 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 1.64s 1.82s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWC013-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 04:32:55 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.20/0.47 The process was started by sandbox2 on n010.cluster.edu,
% 0.20/0.47 Sun Jun 12 04:32:55 2022
% 0.20/0.47 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 9995.
% 0.20/0.47
% 0.20/0.47 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.20/0.47 set(auto).
% 0.20/0.47 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.20/0.47 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.20/0.47 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.20/0.47 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.20/0.47 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.20/0.47 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.20/0.47 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.20/0.47 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.20/0.47 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.20/0.47 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.20/0.47 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.20/0.47 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.20/0.47 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.20/0.47 clear(print_given).
% 0.20/0.47
% 0.20/0.47 list(usable).
% 0.20/0.47
% 0.20/0.47 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.20/0.47
% 0.20/0.47 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.20/0.47 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.20/0.47 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.20/0.47 clauses in usable.
% 0.20/0.47
% 0.20/0.47 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.20/0.47 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.20/0.47 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.20/0.47 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.20/0.47 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.20/0.47 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.20/0.47 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.20/0.47 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.20/0.47 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.20/0.47 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.20/0.47 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.20/0.47 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.20/0.47 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.20/0.47 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.20/0.47 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.20/0.47
% 0.20/0.47 ------------> process usable:
% 0.20/0.47 Following clause subsumed by 23 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssList(tl(A))|nil=A.
% 0.20/0.47 Following clause subsumed by 24 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssItem(hd(A))|nil=A.
% 0.20/0.47 Following clause subsumed by 67 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -leq(A,B)| -ssItem(B)| -ssItem(A)|lt(A,B)|A=B.
% 0.20/0.47 140 back subsumes 139.
% 0.20/0.47 150 back subsumes 144.
% 0.20/0.47
% 0.20/0.47 ------------> process sos:
% 0.20/0.47 430 back subsumes 133.
% 0.20/0.47 Following clause subsumed by 431 during input processing: 0 [copy,431,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.20/0.47 431 back subsumes 337.
% 0.20/0.47 431 back subsumes 281.
% 0.20/0.47 431 back subsumes 280.
% 0.20/0.47 431 back subsumes 279.
% 0.20/0.47 431 back subsumes 269.
% 0.20/0.47 431 back subsumes 256.
% 0.20/0.47 431 back subsumes 255.
% 0.20/0.47 431 back subsumes 254.
% 0.20/0.47 431 back subsumes 217.
% 0.20/0.47 431 back subsumes 205.
% 0.20/0.47 431 back subsumes 204.
% 0.20/0.47 431 back subsumes 203.
% 0.20/0.47 431 back subsumes 202.
% 0.20/0.47 431 back subsumes 185.
% 0.20/0.47 431 back subsumes 182.
% 0.20/0.47 431 back subsumes 180.
% 0.20/0.47 431 back subsumes 176.
% 0.20/0.47 431 back subsumes 173.
% 0.20/0.47 431 back subsumes 150.
% 0.20/0.47 431 back subsumes 149.
% 0.20/0.47 431 back subsumes 148.
% 0.20/0.47 431 back subsumes 147.
% 0.20/0.47 431 back subsumes 146.
% 0.20/0.47 431 back subsumes 138.
% 0.20/0.47 431 back subsumes 137.
% 0.20/0.47
% 0.20/0.47 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.54/0.76
% 0.54/0.76 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.54/0.76
% 0.54/0.76 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.54/0.76
% 0.54/0.76
% 0.54/0.76 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.54/0.76
% 0.54/0.76 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.54/0.76 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.54/0.76 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.54/0.76 number of clauses in intial UL: 334
% 0.54/0.76 number of clauses initially in problem: 396
% 0.54/0.76 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 84
% 0.54/0.76 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 94
% 0.54/0.76 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.54/0.76 absolute distinct symbol count: 73
% 0.54/0.76 distinct predicate count: 20
% 0.54/0.76 distinct function count: 46
% 0.54/0.76 distinct constant count: 7
% 0.54/0.76
% 0.54/0.76 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.54/0.76
% 0.54/0.76
% 0.54/0.76
% 0.54/0.76 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.54/0.76
% 0.54/0.76 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.64/1.82
% 1.64/1.82 SEGMENTATION FAULT!! This is probably caused by a
% 1.64/1.82 bug in Otter. Please send copy of the input file to
% 1.64/1.82 otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 1.64/1.82 using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 1.64/1.82
% 1.64/1.82
% 1.64/1.82 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.64/1.82
% 1.64/1.82 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.64/1.82
% 1.64/1.82 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.64/1.82
% 1.64/1.82 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.64/1.82
% 1.64/1.82 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.64/1.82
% 1.64/1.82 Model 2 [ 1 1 3979 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.64/1.82
% 1.64/1.82 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.64/1.82
% 1.64/1.82 true clauses given 1 (16.7%)
% 1.64/1.82 false clauses given 5
% 1.64/1.82
% 1.64/1.82 FALSE TRUE
% 1.64/1.82 2 3 3
% 1.64/1.82 3 40 3
% 1.64/1.82 4 7 0
% 1.64/1.82 5 1 0
% 1.64/1.82 7 0 29
% 1.64/1.82 9 0 21
% 1.64/1.82 10 0 2
% 1.64/1.82 11 1 43
% 1.64/1.82 12 0 18
% 1.64/1.82 13 0 25
% 1.64/1.82 14 0 8
% 1.64/1.82 15 0 22
% 1.64/1.82 16 0 14
% 1.64/1.82 17 0 12
% 1.64/1.82 19 0 8
% 1.64/1.82 21 0 18
% 1.64/1.82 22 0 10
% 1.64/1.82 23 0 6
% 1.64/1.82 tot: 52 242 (82.3% true)
% 1.64/1.82
% 1.64/1.82
% 1.64/1.82 Model 2 [ 1 1 3979 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.64/1.82
% 1.64/1.82 SEGMENTATION FAULT!! This is probably caused by a
% 1.64/1.82 bug in Otter. Please send copy of the input file to
% 1.64/1.82 otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 1.64/1.82 using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 1.64/1.82
% 1.64/1.82
% 1.64/1.82 The job finished Sun Jun 12 04:32:56 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------