TSTP Solution File: SWC011+1 by Princess---230619
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Princess---230619
% Problem : SWC011+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 20:49:10 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 31.81s 5.22s
% Output : Proof 46.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.12 % Problem : SWC011+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.05/0.13 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 14:58:02 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.62 ________ _____
% 0.17/0.62 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.17/0.62 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/
% 0.17/0.62 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ )
% 0.17/0.62 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.17/0.62
% 0.17/0.62 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.17/0.62 (2023-06-19)
% 0.17/0.62
% 0.17/0.62 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.17/0.62 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.17/0.62 Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.17/0.62 Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.17/0.62
% 0.17/0.62 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.17/0.62
% 0.17/0.62 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.17/0.64 Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.17/0.66 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.17/0.66 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.17/0.66 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.17/0.66 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.17/0.66 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.17/0.66 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.17/0.66 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 6.46/1.68 Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 6.46/1.68 Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 6.46/1.74 Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 6.46/1.74 Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 6.46/1.74 Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 6.46/1.74 Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 6.46/1.74 Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 21.05/3.66 Prover 2: Proving ...
% 21.72/3.78 Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 22.20/3.81 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 22.20/3.83 Prover 6: Proving ...
% 22.20/3.90 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 31.41/5.05 Prover 0: Proving ...
% 31.41/5.06 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 31.81/5.21 Prover 0: proved (4562ms)
% 31.81/5.21
% 31.81/5.22 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 31.81/5.22
% 31.81/5.22 Prover 5: stopped
% 31.81/5.23 Prover 3: stopped
% 33.00/5.23 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 33.00/5.23 Prover 6: stopped
% 33.00/5.27 Prover 2: stopped
% 33.00/5.27 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 33.00/5.27 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 33.00/5.27 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 33.00/5.27 Prover 13: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 35.56/5.61 Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 35.56/5.61 Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 35.56/5.64 Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 35.56/5.64 Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 35.98/5.66 Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 38.16/5.99 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 38.82/6.02 Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 39.36/6.16 Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 41.06/6.32 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 41.06/6.34 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 41.59/6.44 Prover 10: Found proof (size 18)
% 41.59/6.45 Prover 10: proved (1210ms)
% 41.59/6.45 Prover 7: stopped
% 41.59/6.45 Prover 4: stopped
% 41.59/6.45 Prover 13: stopped
% 41.59/6.45 Prover 1: stopped
% 41.59/6.45 Prover 8: stopped
% 45.50/7.32 Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 45.80/7.37 Prover 11: stopped
% 45.80/7.38
% 45.80/7.38 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 45.80/7.38
% 45.80/7.38 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 45.80/7.39 Assumptions after simplification:
% 45.80/7.39 ---------------------------------
% 45.80/7.39
% 45.80/7.39 (ax17)
% 45.80/7.39 $i(nil) & ssList(nil)
% 45.80/7.39
% 45.80/7.39 (ax58)
% 45.80/7.40 $i(nil) & ! [v0: $i] : (v0 = nil | ~ $i(v0) | ~ segmentP(nil, v0) | ~
% 45.80/7.40 ssList(v0)) & ( ~ ssList(nil) | segmentP(nil, nil))
% 45.80/7.40
% 45.80/7.40 (co1)
% 45.99/7.43 $i(nil) & ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: $i] : ? [v2: $i] : ? [v3: $i] : ? [v4: $i]
% 45.99/7.43 : ? [v5: $i] : ? [v6: $i] : (cons(v2, nil) = v3 & app(v5, v6) = v1 & app(v4,
% 45.99/7.43 v6) = v0 & app(v4, v3) = v5 & $i(v6) & $i(v5) & $i(v4) & $i(v3) & $i(v2) &
% 45.99/7.43 $i(v1) & $i(v0) & ssList(v6) & ssList(v4) & ssList(v1) & ssList(v0) &
% 45.99/7.43 neq(v1, nil) & ssItem(v2) & ! [v7: $i] : ! [v8: $i] : ! [v9: $i] : !
% 45.99/7.43 [v10: $i] : ! [v11: $i] : ( ~ (cons(v7, nil) = v8) | ~ (app(v10, v11) =
% 45.99/7.43 v1) | ~ (app(v9, v8) = v10) | ~ $i(v11) | ~ $i(v9) | ~ $i(v7) | ~
% 45.99/7.43 ssList(v11) | ~ ssList(v9) | ~ ssItem(v7) | ? [v12: $i] : ( ~ (v12 =
% 45.99/7.43 v0) & app(v9, v11) = v12 & $i(v12))))
% 45.99/7.43
% 45.99/7.43 (function-axioms)
% 45.99/7.43 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~
% 45.99/7.43 (cons(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (cons(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] :
% 45.99/7.43 ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (app(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (app(v3, v2)
% 45.99/7.43 = v0)) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (tl(v2) =
% 45.99/7.43 v1) | ~ (tl(v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : (v1 =
% 45.99/7.43 v0 | ~ (hd(v2) = v1) | ~ (hd(v2) = v0))
% 45.99/7.43
% 45.99/7.43 Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 45.99/7.43 --------------------------------------------
% 45.99/7.43 ax1, ax10, ax11, ax12, ax13, ax14, ax15, ax16, ax18, ax19, ax2, ax20, ax21,
% 45.99/7.43 ax22, ax23, ax24, ax25, ax26, ax27, ax28, ax29, ax3, ax30, ax31, ax32, ax33,
% 45.99/7.43 ax34, ax35, ax36, ax37, ax38, ax39, ax4, ax40, ax41, ax42, ax43, ax44, ax45,
% 45.99/7.43 ax46, ax47, ax48, ax49, ax5, ax50, ax51, ax52, ax53, ax54, ax55, ax56, ax57,
% 45.99/7.43 ax59, ax6, ax60, ax61, ax62, ax63, ax64, ax65, ax66, ax67, ax68, ax69, ax7,
% 45.99/7.43 ax70, ax71, ax72, ax73, ax74, ax75, ax76, ax77, ax78, ax79, ax8, ax80, ax81,
% 45.99/7.43 ax82, ax83, ax84, ax85, ax86, ax87, ax88, ax89, ax9, ax90, ax91, ax92, ax93,
% 45.99/7.43 ax94, ax95
% 45.99/7.43
% 45.99/7.43 Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 45.99/7.43 ---------------------------------
% 45.99/7.43
% 45.99/7.43 Begin of proof
% 45.99/7.43 |
% 45.99/7.43 | ALPHA: (ax17) implies:
% 45.99/7.43 | (1) ssList(nil)
% 45.99/7.43 |
% 45.99/7.43 | ALPHA: (ax58) implies:
% 45.99/7.43 | (2) ~ ssList(nil) | segmentP(nil, nil)
% 45.99/7.43 |
% 45.99/7.43 | ALPHA: (co1) implies:
% 45.99/7.44 | (3) ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: $i] : ? [v2: $i] : ? [v3: $i] : ? [v4: $i] :
% 45.99/7.44 | ? [v5: $i] : ? [v6: $i] : (cons(v2, nil) = v3 & app(v5, v6) = v1 &
% 45.99/7.44 | app(v4, v6) = v0 & app(v4, v3) = v5 & $i(v6) & $i(v5) & $i(v4) &
% 45.99/7.44 | $i(v3) & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0) & ssList(v6) & ssList(v4) &
% 45.99/7.44 | ssList(v1) & ssList(v0) & neq(v1, nil) & ssItem(v2) & ! [v7: $i] :
% 45.99/7.44 | ! [v8: $i] : ! [v9: $i] : ! [v10: $i] : ! [v11: $i] : ( ~
% 45.99/7.44 | (cons(v7, nil) = v8) | ~ (app(v10, v11) = v1) | ~ (app(v9, v8) =
% 45.99/7.44 | v10) | ~ $i(v11) | ~ $i(v9) | ~ $i(v7) | ~ ssList(v11) | ~
% 45.99/7.44 | ssList(v9) | ~ ssItem(v7) | ? [v12: $i] : ( ~ (v12 = v0) &
% 45.99/7.44 | app(v9, v11) = v12 & $i(v12))))
% 46.15/7.44 |
% 46.15/7.44 | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies:
% 46.15/7.44 | (4) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~
% 46.15/7.44 | (app(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (app(v3, v2) = v0))
% 46.15/7.44 |
% 46.15/7.44 | DELTA: instantiating (3) with fresh symbols all_91_0, all_91_1, all_91_2,
% 46.15/7.44 | all_91_3, all_91_4, all_91_5, all_91_6 gives:
% 46.15/7.44 | (5) cons(all_91_4, nil) = all_91_3 & app(all_91_1, all_91_0) = all_91_5 &
% 46.15/7.44 | app(all_91_2, all_91_0) = all_91_6 & app(all_91_2, all_91_3) = all_91_1
% 46.15/7.44 | & $i(all_91_0) & $i(all_91_1) & $i(all_91_2) & $i(all_91_3) &
% 46.15/7.44 | $i(all_91_4) & $i(all_91_5) & $i(all_91_6) & ssList(all_91_0) &
% 46.15/7.44 | ssList(all_91_2) & ssList(all_91_5) & ssList(all_91_6) & neq(all_91_5,
% 46.15/7.44 | nil) & ssItem(all_91_4) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] :
% 46.15/7.44 | ! [v3: $i] : ! [v4: $i] : ( ~ (cons(v0, nil) = v1) | ~ (app(v3, v4) =
% 46.15/7.44 | all_91_5) | ~ (app(v2, v1) = v3) | ~ $i(v4) | ~ $i(v2) | ~
% 46.15/7.44 | $i(v0) | ~ ssList(v4) | ~ ssList(v2) | ~ ssItem(v0) | ? [v5: any]
% 46.15/7.44 | : ( ~ (v5 = all_91_6) & app(v2, v4) = v5 & $i(v5)))
% 46.15/7.44 |
% 46.15/7.44 | ALPHA: (5) implies:
% 46.15/7.45 | (6) ssItem(all_91_4)
% 46.15/7.45 | (7) ssList(all_91_2)
% 46.15/7.45 | (8) ssList(all_91_0)
% 46.15/7.45 | (9) $i(all_91_4)
% 46.15/7.45 | (10) $i(all_91_2)
% 46.15/7.45 | (11) $i(all_91_0)
% 46.15/7.45 | (12) app(all_91_2, all_91_3) = all_91_1
% 46.15/7.45 | (13) app(all_91_2, all_91_0) = all_91_6
% 46.15/7.45 | (14) app(all_91_1, all_91_0) = all_91_5
% 46.15/7.45 | (15) cons(all_91_4, nil) = all_91_3
% 46.15/7.45 | (16) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ! [v4: $i] :
% 46.15/7.45 | ( ~ (cons(v0, nil) = v1) | ~ (app(v3, v4) = all_91_5) | ~ (app(v2,
% 46.15/7.45 | v1) = v3) | ~ $i(v4) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ ssList(v4) |
% 46.15/7.45 | ~ ssList(v2) | ~ ssItem(v0) | ? [v5: any] : ( ~ (v5 = all_91_6) &
% 46.15/7.45 | app(v2, v4) = v5 & $i(v5)))
% 46.15/7.45 |
% 46.15/7.45 | BETA: splitting (2) gives:
% 46.15/7.45 |
% 46.15/7.45 | Case 1:
% 46.15/7.45 | |
% 46.15/7.45 | | (17) ~ ssList(nil)
% 46.15/7.45 | |
% 46.15/7.45 | | PRED_UNIFY: (1), (17) imply:
% 46.15/7.45 | | (18) $false
% 46.15/7.45 | |
% 46.15/7.45 | | CLOSE: (18) is inconsistent.
% 46.15/7.45 | |
% 46.15/7.45 | Case 2:
% 46.15/7.45 | |
% 46.15/7.45 | |
% 46.15/7.45 | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (16) with all_91_4, all_91_3, all_91_2, all_91_1,
% 46.15/7.45 | | all_91_0, simplifying with (6), (7), (8), (9), (10), (11),
% 46.15/7.45 | | (12), (14), (15) gives:
% 46.15/7.45 | | (19) ? [v0: any] : ( ~ (v0 = all_91_6) & app(all_91_2, all_91_0) = v0 &
% 46.15/7.45 | | $i(v0))
% 46.15/7.46 | |
% 46.15/7.46 | | DELTA: instantiating (19) with fresh symbol all_112_0 gives:
% 46.15/7.46 | | (20) ~ (all_112_0 = all_91_6) & app(all_91_2, all_91_0) = all_112_0 &
% 46.15/7.46 | | $i(all_112_0)
% 46.15/7.46 | |
% 46.15/7.46 | | ALPHA: (20) implies:
% 46.15/7.46 | | (21) ~ (all_112_0 = all_91_6)
% 46.15/7.46 | | (22) app(all_91_2, all_91_0) = all_112_0
% 46.15/7.46 | |
% 46.15/7.46 | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with all_91_6, all_112_0, all_91_0, all_91_2,
% 46.15/7.46 | | simplifying with (13), (22) gives:
% 46.15/7.46 | | (23) all_112_0 = all_91_6
% 46.15/7.46 | |
% 46.15/7.46 | | REDUCE: (21), (23) imply:
% 46.15/7.46 | | (24) $false
% 46.15/7.46 | |
% 46.15/7.46 | | CLOSE: (24) is inconsistent.
% 46.15/7.46 | |
% 46.15/7.46 | End of split
% 46.15/7.46 |
% 46.15/7.46 End of proof
% 46.15/7.46 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 46.15/7.46
% 46.15/7.46 6835ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------