TSTP Solution File: SWC008+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWC008+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 20:26:07 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 1.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 23 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 112 ( 28 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 18 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 143 ( 54 ~; 49 |; 28 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 11 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 22 ( 6 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 41 ( 0 sgn 19 !; 9 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( X2 != X4
| X1 != X3
| ~ frontsegP(X4,X3)
| ~ equalelemsP(X3)
| ? [X5] :
( ssList(X5)
& ? [X6] :
( ssList(X6)
& ? [X7] :
( ssList(X7)
& app(app(X5,X6),X7) = X2
& app(X5,X7) = X1 ) ) )
| ? [X8] :
( ssList(X8)
& neq(X3,X8)
& frontsegP(X4,X8)
& segmentP(X8,X3)
& equalelemsP(X8) ) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',co1) ).
fof(ax5,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ( frontsegP(X1,X2)
<=> ? [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
& app(X2,X3) = X1 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax5) ).
fof(ax84,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> app(X1,nil) = X1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax84) ).
fof(ax17,axiom,
ssList(nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax17) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( X2 != X4
| X1 != X3
| ~ frontsegP(X4,X3)
| ~ equalelemsP(X3)
| ? [X5] :
( ssList(X5)
& ? [X6] :
( ssList(X6)
& ? [X7] :
( ssList(X7)
& app(app(X5,X6),X7) = X2
& app(X5,X7) = X1 ) ) )
| ? [X8] :
( ssList(X8)
& neq(X3,X8)
& frontsegP(X4,X8)
& segmentP(X8,X3)
& equalelemsP(X8) ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
! [X13,X14,X15,X16] :
( ssList(esk1_0)
& ssList(esk2_0)
& ssList(esk3_0)
& ssList(esk4_0)
& esk2_0 = esk4_0
& esk1_0 = esk3_0
& frontsegP(esk4_0,esk3_0)
& equalelemsP(esk3_0)
& ( ~ ssList(X13)
| ~ ssList(X14)
| ~ ssList(X15)
| app(app(X13,X14),X15) != esk2_0
| app(X13,X15) != esk1_0 )
& ( ~ ssList(X16)
| ~ neq(esk3_0,X16)
| ~ frontsegP(esk4_0,X16)
| ~ segmentP(X16,esk3_0)
| ~ equalelemsP(X16) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X4,X5,X7] :
( ( ssList(esk11_2(X4,X5))
| ~ frontsegP(X4,X5)
| ~ ssList(X5)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& ( app(X5,esk11_2(X4,X5)) = X4
| ~ frontsegP(X4,X5)
| ~ ssList(X5)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& ( ~ ssList(X7)
| app(X5,X7) != X4
| frontsegP(X4,X5)
| ~ ssList(X5)
| ~ ssList(X4) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax5])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( app(X1,X2) != esk1_0
| app(app(X1,X3),X2) != esk2_0
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X3)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( app(X2,esk11_2(X1,X2)) = X1
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ frontsegP(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ssList(esk11_2(X1,X2))
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ frontsegP(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ ssList(X2)
| app(X2,nil) = X2 ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax84])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( app(X1,X2) != esk2_0
| app(X3,X2) != esk1_0
| ~ frontsegP(X1,X3)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X3)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( app(X1,nil) = X1
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
ssList(nil),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax17]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
frontsegP(esk4_0,esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
esk2_0 = esk4_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
esk1_0 = esk3_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( app(X1,nil) != esk1_0
| X2 != esk2_0
| ~ frontsegP(X2,X1)
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
frontsegP(esk2_0,esk1_0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
ssList(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
ssList(esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
app(esk1_0,nil) != esk1_0,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_20])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_12]),c_0_19])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SWC008+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 07:23:55 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/1.41 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.22/1.41 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.22/1.41 # Preprocessing time : 0.021 s
% 0.22/1.41
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof found!
% 0.22/1.41 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/1.41 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object total steps : 23
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object clause steps : 15
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object formula steps : 8
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object conjectures : 14
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object clause conjectures : 11
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object initial clauses used : 10
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object initial formulas used : 4
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object generating inferences : 4
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 10
% 0.22/1.41 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.22/1.41 # Parsed axioms : 96
% 0.22/1.41 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 59
% 0.22/1.41 # Initial clauses : 70
% 0.22/1.41 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Initial clauses in saturation : 70
% 0.22/1.41 # Processed clauses : 905
% 0.22/1.41 # ...of these trivial : 13
% 0.22/1.41 # ...subsumed : 643
% 0.22/1.41 # ...remaining for further processing : 249
% 0.22/1.41 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 36
% 0.22/1.41 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Backward-subsumed : 13
% 0.22/1.41 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.22/1.41 # Generated clauses : 3902
% 0.22/1.41 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 3477
% 0.22/1.41 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 334
% 0.22/1.41 # Paramodulations : 3847
% 0.22/1.41 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Equation resolutions : 55
% 0.22/1.41 # Current number of processed clauses : 232
% 0.22/1.41 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 14
% 0.22/1.41 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Negative unit clauses : 8
% 0.22/1.41 # Non-unit-clauses : 210
% 0.22/1.41 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2565
% 0.22/1.41 # ...number of literals in the above : 16548
% 0.22/1.41 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Current number of archived clauses : 14
% 0.22/1.41 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 18634
% 0.22/1.41 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10069
% 0.22/1.41 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 682
% 0.22/1.41 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 106
% 0.22/1.41 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.22/1.41 # BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 0.22/1.41 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Termbank termtop insertions : 66570
% 0.22/1.41
% 0.22/1.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/1.41 # User time : 0.150 s
% 0.22/1.41 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.22/1.41 # Total time : 0.157 s
% 0.22/1.41 # Maximum resident set size: 5856 pages
% 0.22/23.41 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.22/23.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------