TSTP Solution File: SWC007+1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : SWC007+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:38:50 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.17s 0.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   24 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   93 (  44 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   13 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  113 (  44   ~;  38   |;  18   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;  12  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   20 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   37 (   0 sgn;  19   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
         => ! [X3] :
              ( ssList(X3)
             => ! [X4] :
                  ( ssList(X4)
                 => ( nil != X3
                    | X2 != X4
                    | X1 != X3
                    | ? [X5] :
                        ( ssList(X5)
                        & ? [X6] :
                            ( ssList(X6)
                            & ? [X7] :
                                ( ssList(X7)
                                & app(app(X5,X6),X7) = X2
                                & app(X5,X7) = X1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wfrYkZl6KZ/E---3.1_8867.p',co1) ).

fof(ax83,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
         => ( nil = app(X1,X2)
          <=> ( nil = X2
              & nil = X1 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wfrYkZl6KZ/E---3.1_8867.p',ax83) ).

fof(ax17,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wfrYkZl6KZ/E---3.1_8867.p',ax17) ).

fof(ax28,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => app(nil,X1) = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wfrYkZl6KZ/E---3.1_8867.p',ax28) ).

fof(ax84,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => app(X1,nil) = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wfrYkZl6KZ/E---3.1_8867.p',ax84) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ssList(X1)
       => ! [X2] :
            ( ssList(X2)
           => ! [X3] :
                ( ssList(X3)
               => ! [X4] :
                    ( ssList(X4)
                   => ( nil != X3
                      | X2 != X4
                      | X1 != X3
                      | ? [X5] :
                          ( ssList(X5)
                          & ? [X6] :
                              ( ssList(X6)
                              & ? [X7] :
                                  ( ssList(X7)
                                  & app(app(X5,X6),X7) = X2
                                  & app(X5,X7) = X1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X12,X13,X14] :
      ( ssList(esk1_0)
      & ssList(esk2_0)
      & ssList(esk3_0)
      & ssList(esk4_0)
      & nil = esk3_0
      & esk2_0 = esk4_0
      & esk1_0 = esk3_0
      & ( ~ ssList(X12)
        | ~ ssList(X13)
        | ~ ssList(X14)
        | app(app(X12,X13),X14) != esk2_0
        | app(X12,X14) != esk1_0 ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    esk1_0 = esk3_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    nil = esk3_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X32,X33] :
      ( ( nil = X33
        | nil != app(X32,X33)
        | ~ ssList(X33)
        | ~ ssList(X32) )
      & ( nil = X32
        | nil != app(X32,X33)
        | ~ ssList(X33)
        | ~ ssList(X32) )
      & ( nil != X33
        | nil != X32
        | nil = app(X32,X33)
        | ~ ssList(X33)
        | ~ ssList(X32) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax83])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | app(app(X1,X2),X3) != esk2_0
    | app(X1,X3) != esk1_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    esk1_0 = nil,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( nil = app(X2,X1)
    | nil != X1
    | nil != X2
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ssList(nil),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax17]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( app(app(X1,X2),X3) != esk2_0
    | app(X1,X3) != nil
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    app(nil,nil) = nil,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])]),c_0_13])]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X20] :
      ( ~ ssList(X20)
      | app(nil,X20) = X20 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax28])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( app(app(nil,X1),nil) != esk2_0
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_13])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( app(nil,X1) = X1
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X34] :
      ( ~ ssList(X34)
      | app(X34,nil) = X34 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax84])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( app(X1,nil) != esk2_0
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( app(X1,nil) = X1
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21])]),c_0_22])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.11  % Problem    : SWC007+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.31  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.11/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.31  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 01:47:05 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.17/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wfrYkZl6KZ/E---3.1_8867.p
% 0.17/0.43  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.17/0.43  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.43  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.43  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.43  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.43  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.43  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.43  # new_bool_1 with pid 8947 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.43  # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.17/0.43  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.43  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.43  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.43  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.43  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.43  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.43  # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.43  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.43  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2v with 163s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.43  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2v with pid 8950 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.43  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2v
% 0.17/0.43  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.43  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.43  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.43  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.43  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.43  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.43  # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.43  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.43  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2v with 163s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.43  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.17/0.43  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.17/0.43  
% 0.17/0.43  # Proof found!
% 0.17/0.43  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.17/0.43  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.43  # Parsed axioms                        : 96
% 0.17/0.43  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 79
% 0.17/0.43  # Initial clauses                      : 31
% 0.17/0.43  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.17/0.43  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 31
% 0.17/0.43  # Processed clauses                    : 56
% 0.17/0.43  # ...of these trivial                  : 3
% 0.17/0.43  # ...subsumed                          : 1
% 0.17/0.43  # ...remaining for further processing  : 52
% 0.17/0.43  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 5
% 0.17/0.43  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.17/0.43  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.17/0.43  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.17/0.43  # Generated clauses                    : 19
% 0.17/0.43  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 10
% 0.17/0.43  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.17/0.43  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.17/0.43  # Paramodulations                      : 15
% 0.17/0.43  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.17/0.43  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.17/0.43  # Equation resolutions                 : 5
% 0.17/0.43  # Total rewrite steps                  : 27
% 0.17/0.43  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.17/0.43  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.17/0.43  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.43  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.17/0.43  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.43  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.17/0.43  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.17/0.43  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.17/0.43  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.17/0.43  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.17/0.43  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.17/0.43  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.17/0.43  # Current number of processed clauses  : 23
% 0.17/0.43  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 8
% 0.17/0.43  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.43  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.17/0.43  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 13
% 0.17/0.43  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 11
% 0.17/0.43  # ...number of literals in the above   : 43
% 0.17/0.43  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.17/0.43  # Current number of archived clauses   : 28
% 0.17/0.43  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 72
% 0.17/0.43  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 32
% 0.17/0.43  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.17/0.43  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.17/0.43  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.17/0.43  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.17/0.43  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.17/0.43  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.17/0.43  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.17/0.43  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 3392
% 0.17/0.43  
% 0.17/0.43  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.43  # User time                : 0.001 s
% 0.17/0.43  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.17/0.43  # Total time               : 0.005 s
% 0.17/0.43  # Maximum resident set size: 1892 pages
% 0.17/0.43  
% 0.17/0.43  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.43  # User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.17/0.43  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.17/0.43  # Total time               : 0.010 s
% 0.17/0.43  # Maximum resident set size: 1796 pages
% 0.17/0.43  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.17/0.43  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------