TSTP Solution File: SWC001-1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SWC001-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 21:58:49 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unknown 0.61s 0.80s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem  : SWC001-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.08/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 20:52:23 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.44  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.20/0.44  The process was started by sandbox2 on n029.cluster.edu,
% 0.20/0.44  Sat Jun 11 20:52:23 2022
% 0.20/0.44  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 13621.
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.20/0.44  set(auto).
% 0.20/0.44     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.20/0.44     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.20/0.44     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.20/0.44     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.20/0.44     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.20/0.44     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.20/0.44     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.20/0.44     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.20/0.44     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.20/0.44     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.20/0.44     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.20/0.44     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.20/0.44     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.20/0.44  clear(print_given).
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  list(usable).
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.20/0.44  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.20/0.44  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.20/0.44  clauses in usable.
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.20/0.44     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.20/0.44     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.20/0.44     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.20/0.44     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.20/0.44     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.20/0.44     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.20/0.44     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.20/0.44     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.20/0.44     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.20/0.44     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.20/0.44     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.20/0.44     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.20/0.44     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.20/0.44     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  ------------> process usable:
% 0.20/0.44    Following clause subsumed by 23 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssList(tl(A))|nil=A.
% 0.20/0.44    Following clause subsumed by 24 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssItem(hd(A))|nil=A.
% 0.20/0.44    Following clause subsumed by 67 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -leq(A,B)| -ssItem(B)| -ssItem(A)|lt(A,B)|A=B.
% 0.20/0.44  140 back subsumes 139.
% 0.20/0.44  150 back subsumes 144.
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  ------------> process sos:
% 0.20/0.44    Following clause subsumed by 431 during input processing: 0 [copy,431,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.20/0.44  431 back subsumes 337.
% 0.20/0.44  431 back subsumes 281.
% 0.20/0.44  431 back subsumes 280.
% 0.20/0.44  431 back subsumes 279.
% 0.20/0.44  431 back subsumes 269.
% 0.20/0.44  431 back subsumes 256.
% 0.20/0.44  431 back subsumes 255.
% 0.20/0.44  431 back subsumes 254.
% 0.20/0.44  431 back subsumes 217.
% 0.20/0.44  431 back subsumes 205.
% 0.20/0.44  431 back subsumes 204.
% 0.20/0.44  431 back subsumes 203.
% 0.20/0.44  431 back subsumes 202.
% 0.20/0.44  431 back subsumes 185.
% 0.20/0.44  431 back subsumes 182.
% 0.20/0.44  431 back subsumes 180.
% 0.20/0.44  431 back subsumes 176.
% 0.20/0.44  431 back subsumes 173.
% 0.20/0.44  431 back subsumes 150.
% 0.20/0.44  431 back subsumes 149.
% 0.20/0.44  431 back subsumes 148.
% 0.20/0.44  431 back subsumes 147.
% 0.20/0.44  431 back subsumes 146.
% 0.20/0.44  431 back subsumes 138.
% 0.20/0.44  431 back subsumes 137.
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.50  
% 0.20/0.50  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.50  
% 0.20/0.50  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.50  
% 0.20/0.50  
% 0.20/0.50  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.50  
% 0.20/0.50  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.50  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.50  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.50  number of clauses in intial UL: 337
% 0.20/0.50  number of clauses initially in problem: 399
% 0.20/0.50  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 84
% 0.20/0.50  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 97
% 0.20/0.50  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.20/0.50  absolute distinct symbol count: 74
% 0.20/0.50     distinct predicate count: 20
% 0.20/0.50     distinct function count: 46
% 0.20/0.50     distinct constant count: 8
% 0.20/0.50  
% 0.20/0.50  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.50  
% 0.20/0.50  
% 0.20/0.50  
% 0.20/0.50  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.61/0.80  
% 0.61/0.80  SEGMENTATION FAULT!!  This is probably caused by a
% 0.61/0.80  bug in Otter.  Please send copy of the input file to
% 0.61/0.80  otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 0.61/0.80  using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 0.61/0.80  
% 0.61/0.80  
% 0.61/0.80  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.61/0.80  
% 0.61/0.80  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.61/0.80  
% 0.61/0.80  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.61/0.80  
% 0.61/0.80  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.61/0.80  
% 0.61/0.80  Model 3 [ 1 1 2393 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.61/0.80  
% 0.61/0.80  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.61/0.80  
% 0.61/0.80  true clauses given           1      (33.3%)
% 0.61/0.80  false clauses given          2
% 0.61/0.80  
% 0.61/0.80        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.61/0.80     2  4         6
% 0.61/0.80     3  38        4
% 0.61/0.80     4  7         0
% 0.61/0.80     5  0         1
% 0.61/0.80     7  0         11
% 0.61/0.80     8  0         2
% 0.61/0.80     9  1         8
% 0.61/0.80    11  1         18
% 0.61/0.80    12  3         10
% 0.61/0.80    13  0         10
% 0.61/0.80    14  0         4
% 0.61/0.80    15  0         10
% 0.61/0.80    16  0         7
% 0.61/0.80    17  0         6
% 0.61/0.80    19  0         3
% 0.61/0.80    21  0         9
% 0.61/0.80    22  0         4
% 0.61/0.80    23  0         3
% 0.61/0.80  tot:  54        116      (68.2% true)
% 0.61/0.80  
% 0.61/0.80  
% 0.61/0.80  Model 3 [ 1 1 2393 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.61/0.80  
% 0.61/0.80  SEGMENTATION FAULT!!  This is probably caused by a
% 0.61/0.80  bug in Otter.  Please send copy of the input file to
% 0.61/0.80  otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 0.61/0.80  using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 0.61/0.80  
% 0.61/0.80  
% 0.61/0.80  The job finished Sat Jun 11 20:52:24 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------