TSTP Solution File: SWB096+1 by ePrincess---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ePrincess---1.0
% Problem  : SWB096+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 18:59:50 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 244.75s 168.94s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SWB096+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% 0.14/0.33  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jun  1 04:41:08 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.52/0.58          ____       _                          
% 0.52/0.58    ___  / __ \_____(_)___  ________  __________
% 0.52/0.58   / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/
% 0.52/0.58  /  __/ ____/ /  / / / / / /__/  __(__  |__  ) 
% 0.52/0.58  \___/_/   /_/  /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/  
% 0.52/0.58  
% 0.52/0.58  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic
% 0.52/0.58  (ePrincess v.1.0)
% 0.52/0.58  
% 0.52/0.58  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015
% 0.52/0.58  (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015
% 0.52/0.58  (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner)
% 0.52/0.58  Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
% 0.52/0.58  Bug reports to peter@backeman.se
% 0.52/0.58  
% 0.52/0.58  For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/
% 0.52/0.58  
% 0.52/0.58  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.52/0.63  Prover 0: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 3.55/1.37  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 7.55/2.25  Prover 0: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 7.75/2.32  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 19.90/5.92  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 21.15/6.26  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 24.73/7.04  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 30.88/8.52  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 32.90/8.94  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 45.12/12.60  Prover 2: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 46.01/12.79  Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 60.03/18.32  Prover 0: stopped
% 60.54/18.52  Prover 3: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 60.90/18.77  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 61.35/18.91  Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 61.49/18.93  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 102.47/57.67  Prover 3: stopped
% 102.75/57.87  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=complete
% 103.43/58.19  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 109.12/60.93  Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 109.74/61.10  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 156.29/102.33  Prover 2: stopped
% 156.49/102.53  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 156.96/102.78  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 161.55/105.05  Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 169.05/111.49  Prover 5: stopped
% 169.28/111.69  Prover 6: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 169.55/111.91  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 175.27/115.47  Prover 6: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 175.97/115.67  Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ...
% 194.61/131.79  Prover 1: stopped
% 194.87/131.99  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -resolutionMethod=normal -ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 195.01/132.18  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 196.04/132.41  Prover 7: Proving ...
% 230.05/160.56  Prover 4: stopped
% 230.23/160.77  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal -ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 230.92/160.99  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 232.50/161.37  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 244.74/168.93  Prover 8: proved (8165ms)
% 244.75/168.93  Prover 6: stopped
% 244.75/168.93  Prover 7: stopped
% 244.75/168.94  
% 244.75/168.94  No countermodel exists, formula is valid
% 244.75/168.94  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 244.75/168.94  
% 244.75/168.94  Generating proof ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------