TSTP Solution File: SWB084+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWB084+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 19:02:15 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.57s 47.76s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.57s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 44 ( 13 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 247 ( 26 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 117 ( 5 avg)
% Number of connectives : 356 ( 153 ~; 160 |; 38 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 34 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 17 ( 17 usr; 11 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 83 ( 5 sgn 31 !; 6 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(owl_restrict_exactqcr_object_002,axiom,
! [X11,X2,X5] :
( ( iext(uri_owl_qualifiedCardinality,X11,literal_typed(dat_str_2,uri_xsd_nonNegativeInteger))
& iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X11,X2)
& iext(uri_owl_onClass,X11,X5) )
=> ! [X4] :
( icext(X11,X4)
<=> ( ? [X27,X28] :
( iext(X2,X4,X27)
& icext(X5,X27)
& iext(X2,X4,X28)
& icext(X5,X28)
& X27 != X28 )
& ! [X27,X28,X29] :
( ( iext(X2,X4,X27)
& icext(X5,X27)
& iext(X2,X4,X28)
& icext(X5,X28)
& iext(X2,X4,X29)
& icext(X5,X29) )
=> ( X29 = X27
| X29 = X28 ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_restrict_exactqcr_object_002) ).
fof(premise_rdfbased_sem_restrict_exactqcr_inst_obj_two,axiom,
( iext(uri_owl_qualifiedCardinality,uri_ex_z,literal_typed(dat_str_2,uri_xsd_nonNegativeInteger))
& iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_z,uri_ex_p)
& iext(uri_owl_onClass,uri_ex_z,uri_ex_c)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_z) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',premise_rdfbased_sem_restrict_exactqcr_inst_obj_two) ).
fof(rdfs_cext_def,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X4,X5)
<=> icext(X5,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',rdfs_cext_def) ).
fof(conclusion_rdfbased_sem_restrict_exactqcr_inst_obj_two,conjecture,
? [X37,X42] :
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X42,uri_ex_c)
& iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X42,X37)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,X37,uri_ex_c)
& iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_w,X42)
& iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_w,X37) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',conclusion_rdfbased_sem_restrict_exactqcr_inst_obj_two) ).
fof(owl_eqdis_differentfrom,axiom,
! [X4,X7] :
( iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X4,X7)
<=> X4 != X7 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_eqdis_differentfrom) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X30,X31,X32,X33,X36,X37,X38,X33,X39,X40] :
( ( iext(X31,X33,esk11_4(X30,X31,X32,X33))
| ~ icext(X30,X33)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_qualifiedCardinality,X30,literal_typed(dat_str_2,uri_xsd_nonNegativeInteger))
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X30,X31)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onClass,X30,X32) )
& ( icext(X32,esk11_4(X30,X31,X32,X33))
| ~ icext(X30,X33)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_qualifiedCardinality,X30,literal_typed(dat_str_2,uri_xsd_nonNegativeInteger))
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X30,X31)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onClass,X30,X32) )
& ( iext(X31,X33,esk12_4(X30,X31,X32,X33))
| ~ icext(X30,X33)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_qualifiedCardinality,X30,literal_typed(dat_str_2,uri_xsd_nonNegativeInteger))
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X30,X31)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onClass,X30,X32) )
& ( icext(X32,esk12_4(X30,X31,X32,X33))
| ~ icext(X30,X33)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_qualifiedCardinality,X30,literal_typed(dat_str_2,uri_xsd_nonNegativeInteger))
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X30,X31)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onClass,X30,X32) )
& ( esk11_4(X30,X31,X32,X33) != esk12_4(X30,X31,X32,X33)
| ~ icext(X30,X33)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_qualifiedCardinality,X30,literal_typed(dat_str_2,uri_xsd_nonNegativeInteger))
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X30,X31)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onClass,X30,X32) )
& ( ~ iext(X31,X33,X36)
| ~ icext(X32,X36)
| ~ iext(X31,X33,X37)
| ~ icext(X32,X37)
| ~ iext(X31,X33,X38)
| ~ icext(X32,X38)
| X38 = X36
| X38 = X37
| ~ icext(X30,X33)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_qualifiedCardinality,X30,literal_typed(dat_str_2,uri_xsd_nonNegativeInteger))
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X30,X31)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onClass,X30,X32) )
& ( iext(X31,X33,esk13_4(X30,X31,X32,X33))
| ~ iext(X31,X33,X39)
| ~ icext(X32,X39)
| ~ iext(X31,X33,X40)
| ~ icext(X32,X40)
| X39 = X40
| icext(X30,X33)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_qualifiedCardinality,X30,literal_typed(dat_str_2,uri_xsd_nonNegativeInteger))
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X30,X31)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onClass,X30,X32) )
& ( icext(X32,esk13_4(X30,X31,X32,X33))
| ~ iext(X31,X33,X39)
| ~ icext(X32,X39)
| ~ iext(X31,X33,X40)
| ~ icext(X32,X40)
| X39 = X40
| icext(X30,X33)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_qualifiedCardinality,X30,literal_typed(dat_str_2,uri_xsd_nonNegativeInteger))
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X30,X31)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onClass,X30,X32) )
& ( iext(X31,X33,esk14_4(X30,X31,X32,X33))
| ~ iext(X31,X33,X39)
| ~ icext(X32,X39)
| ~ iext(X31,X33,X40)
| ~ icext(X32,X40)
| X39 = X40
| icext(X30,X33)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_qualifiedCardinality,X30,literal_typed(dat_str_2,uri_xsd_nonNegativeInteger))
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X30,X31)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onClass,X30,X32) )
& ( icext(X32,esk14_4(X30,X31,X32,X33))
| ~ iext(X31,X33,X39)
| ~ icext(X32,X39)
| ~ iext(X31,X33,X40)
| ~ icext(X32,X40)
| X39 = X40
| icext(X30,X33)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_qualifiedCardinality,X30,literal_typed(dat_str_2,uri_xsd_nonNegativeInteger))
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X30,X31)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onClass,X30,X32) )
& ( iext(X31,X33,esk15_4(X30,X31,X32,X33))
| ~ iext(X31,X33,X39)
| ~ icext(X32,X39)
| ~ iext(X31,X33,X40)
| ~ icext(X32,X40)
| X39 = X40
| icext(X30,X33)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_qualifiedCardinality,X30,literal_typed(dat_str_2,uri_xsd_nonNegativeInteger))
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X30,X31)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onClass,X30,X32) )
& ( icext(X32,esk15_4(X30,X31,X32,X33))
| ~ iext(X31,X33,X39)
| ~ icext(X32,X39)
| ~ iext(X31,X33,X40)
| ~ icext(X32,X40)
| X39 = X40
| icext(X30,X33)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_qualifiedCardinality,X30,literal_typed(dat_str_2,uri_xsd_nonNegativeInteger))
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X30,X31)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onClass,X30,X32) )
& ( esk15_4(X30,X31,X32,X33) != esk13_4(X30,X31,X32,X33)
| ~ iext(X31,X33,X39)
| ~ icext(X32,X39)
| ~ iext(X31,X33,X40)
| ~ icext(X32,X40)
| X39 = X40
| icext(X30,X33)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_qualifiedCardinality,X30,literal_typed(dat_str_2,uri_xsd_nonNegativeInteger))
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X30,X31)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onClass,X30,X32) )
& ( esk15_4(X30,X31,X32,X33) != esk14_4(X30,X31,X32,X33)
| ~ iext(X31,X33,X39)
| ~ icext(X32,X39)
| ~ iext(X31,X33,X40)
| ~ icext(X32,X40)
| X39 = X40
| icext(X30,X33)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_qualifiedCardinality,X30,literal_typed(dat_str_2,uri_xsd_nonNegativeInteger))
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X30,X31)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onClass,X30,X32) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_restrict_exactqcr_object_002])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( icext(X2,esk11_4(X1,X3,X2,X4))
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onClass,X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X1,X3)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_qualifiedCardinality,X1,literal_typed(dat_str_2,uri_xsd_nonNegativeInteger))
| ~ icext(X1,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
iext(uri_owl_onClass,uri_ex_z,uri_ex_c),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_restrict_exactqcr_inst_obj_two]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
iext(uri_owl_qualifiedCardinality,uri_ex_z,literal_typed(dat_str_2,uri_xsd_nonNegativeInteger)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_restrict_exactqcr_inst_obj_two]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X6,X7,X6,X7] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X6,X7)
| icext(X7,X6) )
& ( ~ icext(X7,X6)
| iext(uri_rdf_type,X6,X7) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdfs_cext_def])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X37,X42] :
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X42,uri_ex_c)
& iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X42,X37)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,X37,uri_ex_c)
& iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_w,X42)
& iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_w,X37) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conclusion_rdfbased_sem_restrict_exactqcr_inst_obj_two]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( icext(uri_ex_c,esk11_4(uri_ex_z,X1,uri_ex_c,X2))
| ~ icext(uri_ex_z,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_z,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_z,uri_ex_p),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_restrict_exactqcr_inst_obj_two]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( icext(X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_z),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_restrict_exactqcr_inst_obj_two]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( iext(X3,X4,esk11_4(X1,X3,X2,X4))
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onClass,X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X1,X3)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_qualifiedCardinality,X1,literal_typed(dat_str_2,uri_xsd_nonNegativeInteger))
| ~ icext(X1,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( icext(X2,esk12_4(X1,X3,X2,X4))
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onClass,X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X1,X3)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_qualifiedCardinality,X1,literal_typed(dat_str_2,uri_xsd_nonNegativeInteger))
| ~ icext(X1,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
fof(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
! [X43,X44] :
( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X44,uri_ex_c)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X44,X43)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X43,uri_ex_c)
| ~ iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_w,X44)
| ~ iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_w,X43) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_18,plain,
! [X8,X9,X8,X9] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X8,X9)
| X8 != X9 )
& ( X8 = X9
| iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X8,X9) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_eqdis_differentfrom])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( icext(uri_ex_c,esk11_4(uri_ex_z,uri_ex_p,uri_ex_c,X1))
| ~ icext(uri_ex_z,X1) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
icext(uri_ex_z,uri_ex_w),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( iext(X1,X2,esk11_4(uri_ex_z,X1,uri_ex_c,X2))
| ~ icext(uri_ex_z,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_z,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_7]),c_0_8])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( icext(uri_ex_c,esk12_4(uri_ex_z,X1,uri_ex_c,X2))
| ~ icext(uri_ex_z,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_z,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_7]),c_0_8])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( iext(X3,X4,esk12_4(X1,X3,X2,X4))
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onClass,X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X1,X3)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_qualifiedCardinality,X1,literal_typed(dat_str_2,uri_xsd_nonNegativeInteger))
| ~ icext(X1,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_onClass,X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X1,X3)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_qualifiedCardinality,X1,literal_typed(dat_str_2,uri_xsd_nonNegativeInteger))
| ~ icext(X1,X4)
| esk11_4(X1,X3,X2,X4) != esk12_4(X1,X3,X2,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
( ~ iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_w,X1)
| ~ iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_w,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,uri_ex_c)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X2,X1)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X2,uri_ex_c) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X1,X2)
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,X2)
| ~ icext(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
icext(uri_ex_c,esk11_4(uri_ex_z,uri_ex_p,uri_ex_c,uri_ex_w)),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( iext(uri_ex_p,X1,esk11_4(uri_ex_z,uri_ex_p,uri_ex_c,X1))
| ~ icext(uri_ex_z,X1) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( icext(uri_ex_c,esk12_4(uri_ex_z,uri_ex_p,uri_ex_c,X1))
| ~ icext(uri_ex_z,X1) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( iext(X1,X2,esk12_4(uri_ex_z,X1,uri_ex_c,X2))
| ~ icext(uri_ex_z,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_z,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_7]),c_0_8])]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( esk12_4(uri_ex_z,X1,uri_ex_c,X2) != esk11_4(uri_ex_z,X1,uri_ex_c,X2)
| ~ icext(uri_ex_z,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_z,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_7]),c_0_8])]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = X2
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,uri_ex_c)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X2,uri_ex_c)
| ~ iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_w,X1)
| ~ iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_w,X2) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,esk11_4(uri_ex_z,uri_ex_p,uri_ex_c,uri_ex_w),uri_ex_c),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_w,esk11_4(uri_ex_z,uri_ex_p,uri_ex_c,uri_ex_w)),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
icext(uri_ex_c,esk12_4(uri_ex_z,uri_ex_p,uri_ex_c,uri_ex_w)),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( iext(uri_ex_p,X1,esk12_4(uri_ex_z,uri_ex_p,uri_ex_c,X1))
| ~ icext(uri_ex_z,X1) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
( esk12_4(uri_ex_z,uri_ex_p,uri_ex_c,X1) != esk11_4(uri_ex_z,uri_ex_p,uri_ex_c,X1)
| ~ icext(uri_ex_z,X1) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
( esk11_4(uri_ex_z,uri_ex_p,uri_ex_c,uri_ex_w) = X1
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,uri_ex_c)
| ~ iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_w,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_35])]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,esk12_4(uri_ex_z,uri_ex_p,uri_ex_c,uri_ex_w),uri_ex_c),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_w,esk12_4(uri_ex_z,uri_ex_p,uri_ex_c,uri_ex_w)),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
esk12_4(uri_ex_z,uri_ex_p,uri_ex_c,uri_ex_w) != esk11_4(uri_ex_z,uri_ex_p,uri_ex_c,uri_ex_w),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]),c_0_41])]),c_0_42]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SWB084+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue May 31 23:55:40 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.41/23.45 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.41/23.46 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.41/23.48 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.41/23.49 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.56/46.51 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.56/46.51 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.56/46.51 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.56/46.52 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.57/47.75 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.57/47.75 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.57/47.75 # Preprocessing time : 0.028 s
% 0.57/47.75
% 0.57/47.75 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.57/47.75 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.57/47.75 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.57/47.75 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 523
% 0.57/47.75 # Initial clauses : 55
% 0.57/47.75 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 14
% 0.57/47.75 # Initial clauses in saturation : 41
% 0.57/47.75 # Processed clauses : 282
% 0.57/47.75 # ...of these trivial : 22
% 0.57/47.75 # ...subsumed : 99
% 0.57/47.75 # ...remaining for further processing : 161
% 0.57/47.75 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.57/47.75 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # Generated clauses : 396
% 0.57/47.75 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 241
% 0.57/47.75 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 24
% 0.57/47.75 # Paramodulations : 395
% 0.57/47.75 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.57/47.75 # Current number of processed clauses : 160
% 0.57/47.75 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 43
% 0.57/47.75 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.57/47.75 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.57/47.75 # Non-unit-clauses : 116
% 0.57/47.75 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.57/47.75 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.57/47.75 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 7320
% 0.57/47.75 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2655
% 0.57/47.75 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 123
% 0.57/47.75 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 25
% 0.57/47.75 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # BW rewrite match attempts : 7
% 0.57/47.75 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # Termbank termtop insertions : 14627
% 0.57/47.75
% 0.57/47.75 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.57/47.75 # User time : 0.043 s
% 0.57/47.75 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.57/47.75 # Total time : 0.046 s
% 0.57/47.75 # Maximum resident set size: 4240 pages
% 0.57/47.75 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.57/47.75
% 0.57/47.75 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.57/47.75 # OLD status Res
% 0.57/47.75 # Preprocessing time : 0.088 s
% 0.57/47.75 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_eb48853eb71ccd2a6fdade56c25b63f5692e1a0c for 23 seconds:
% 0.57/47.75
% 0.57/47.75 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.57/47.75 # OLD status Res
% 0.57/47.75 # Preprocessing time : 0.048 s
% 0.57/47.75 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_761a0d093d9701c0eed884aebb46468e8d439c31 for 23 seconds:
% 0.57/47.75 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.2,,,100,1.0)
% 0.57/47.75 # Preprocessing time : 0.016 s
% 0.57/47.75
% 0.57/47.75 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.57/47.75 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.57/47.75 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.57/47.75 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 526
% 0.57/47.75 # Initial clauses : 52
% 0.57/47.75 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 14
% 0.57/47.75 # Initial clauses in saturation : 38
% 0.57/47.75 # Processed clauses : 220
% 0.57/47.75 # ...of these trivial : 12
% 0.57/47.75 # ...subsumed : 77
% 0.57/47.75 # ...remaining for further processing : 131
% 0.57/47.75 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.57/47.75 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # Generated clauses : 347
% 0.57/47.75 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 182
% 0.57/47.75 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 24
% 0.57/47.75 # Paramodulations : 346
% 0.57/47.75 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.57/47.75 # Current number of processed clauses : 130
% 0.57/47.75 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 41
% 0.57/47.75 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.57/47.75 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.57/47.75 # Non-unit-clauses : 88
% 0.57/47.75 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.57/47.75 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.57/47.75 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2026
% 0.57/47.75 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 833
% 0.57/47.75 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 101
% 0.57/47.75 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 65
% 0.57/47.75 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # BW rewrite match attempts : 4
% 0.57/47.75 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # Termbank termtop insertions : 13527
% 0.57/47.75
% 0.57/47.75 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.57/47.75 # User time : 0.018 s
% 0.57/47.75 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.57/47.75 # Total time : 0.022 s
% 0.57/47.75 # Maximum resident set size: 4236 pages
% 0.57/47.75 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_bb5e3cecdbc7660bd3a6f864cadb7769d8aea26a for 23 seconds:
% 0.57/47.75 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.1,,,500,1.0)
% 0.57/47.75 # Preprocessing time : 0.027 s
% 0.57/47.75
% 0.57/47.75 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.57/47.75 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.57/47.75 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.57/47.75 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 546
% 0.57/47.75 # Initial clauses : 18
% 0.57/47.75 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 11
% 0.57/47.75 # Initial clauses in saturation : 7
% 0.57/47.75 # Processed clauses : 8
% 0.57/47.75 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # ...remaining for further processing : 8
% 0.57/47.75 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.57/47.75 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # Generated clauses : 2
% 0.57/47.75 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1
% 0.57/47.75 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # Paramodulations : 1
% 0.57/47.75 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.57/47.75 # Current number of processed clauses : 7
% 0.57/47.75 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.57/47.75 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.57/47.75 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.57/47.75 # Non-unit-clauses : 5
% 0.57/47.75 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.57/47.75 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.57/47.75 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.57/47.75 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # Termbank termtop insertions : 7773
% 0.57/47.75
% 0.57/47.75 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.57/47.75 # User time : 0.026 s
% 0.57/47.75 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.57/47.75 # Total time : 0.027 s
% 0.57/47.75 # Maximum resident set size: 3648 pages
% 0.57/47.75 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_e252f7803940d118fa0ef69fc2319cb55aee23b9 for 23 seconds:
% 0.57/47.75 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,1.4,,03,100,1.0)
% 0.57/47.75 # Preprocessing time : 0.029 s
% 0.57/47.75
% 0.57/47.75 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.57/47.75 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.57/47.75 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.57/47.75 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 533
% 0.57/47.75 # Initial clauses : 42
% 0.57/47.75 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 14
% 0.57/47.75 # Initial clauses in saturation : 28
% 0.57/47.75 # Processed clauses : 212
% 0.57/47.75 # ...of these trivial : 14
% 0.57/47.75 # ...subsumed : 52
% 0.57/47.75 # ...remaining for further processing : 146
% 0.57/47.75 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.57/47.75 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # Backward-subsumed : 4
% 0.57/47.75 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # Generated clauses : 309
% 0.57/47.75 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 184
% 0.57/47.75 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # Paramodulations : 308
% 0.57/47.75 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.57/47.75 # Current number of processed clauses : 141
% 0.57/47.75 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 36
% 0.57/47.75 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.57/47.75 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.57/47.75 # Non-unit-clauses : 104
% 0.57/47.75 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.57/47.75 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # Current number of archived clauses : 5
% 0.57/47.75 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1522
% 0.57/47.75 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 789
% 0.57/47.75 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 56
% 0.57/47.75 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 57
% 0.57/47.75 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # BW rewrite match attempts : 4
% 0.57/47.75 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.57/47.75 # Termbank termtop insertions : 13821
% 0.57/47.75
% 0.57/47.75 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.57/47.75 # User time : 0.033 s
% 0.57/47.75 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.57/47.75 # Total time : 0.038 s
% 0.57/47.75 # Maximum resident set size: 4492 pages
% 0.57/47.75 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_b1d72019af42f5b571a6c0b233a5b6d1de064075 for 23 seconds:
% 0.57/47.75 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,02,500,1.0)
% 0.57/47.75 # Preprocessing time : 0.028 s
% 0.57/47.75
% 0.57/47.75 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.57/47.75 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.57/47.75 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.57/47.75 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 536
% 0.57/47.75 # Initial clauses : 35
% 0.57/47.76 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 14
% 0.57/47.76 # Initial clauses in saturation : 21
% 0.57/47.76 # Processed clauses : 57
% 0.57/47.76 # ...of these trivial : 11
% 0.57/47.76 # ...subsumed : 5
% 0.57/47.76 # ...remaining for further processing : 41
% 0.57/47.76 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.57/47.76 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.57/47.76 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.57/47.76 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.57/47.76 # Generated clauses : 47
% 0.57/47.76 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 36
% 0.57/47.76 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 3
% 0.57/47.76 # Paramodulations : 46
% 0.57/47.76 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.57/47.76 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.57/47.76 # Current number of processed clauses : 40
% 0.57/47.76 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 16
% 0.57/47.76 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.57/47.76 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.57/47.76 # Non-unit-clauses : 23
% 0.57/47.76 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.57/47.76 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.57/47.76 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.57/47.76 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.57/47.76 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 75
% 0.57/47.76 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 45
% 0.57/47.76 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 8
% 0.57/47.76 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11
% 0.57/47.76 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.57/47.76 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.57/47.76 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.57/47.76 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.57/47.76 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.57/47.76 # Termbank termtop insertions : 9056
% 0.57/47.76
% 0.57/47.76 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.57/47.76 # User time : 0.023 s
% 0.57/47.76 # System time : 0.008 s
% 0.57/47.76 # Total time : 0.031 s
% 0.57/47.76 # Maximum resident set size: 3676 pages
% 0.57/47.76 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_e96ef4641ae500918cdd95fcfce21e29f2ac5eec for 23 seconds:
% 0.57/47.76 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,6.0,,03,100,1.0)
% 0.57/47.76 # Preprocessing time : 0.037 s
% 0.57/47.76
% 0.57/47.76 # Proof found!
% 0.57/47.76 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.57/47.76 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.57/47.76 # Proof object total steps : 44
% 0.57/47.76 # Proof object clause steps : 34
% 0.57/47.76 # Proof object formula steps : 10
% 0.57/47.76 # Proof object conjectures : 7
% 0.57/47.76 # Proof object clause conjectures : 4
% 0.57/47.76 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.57/47.76 # Proof object initial clauses used : 13
% 0.57/47.76 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 0.57/47.76 # Proof object generating inferences : 21
% 0.57/47.76 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 15
% 0.57/47.76 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.57/47.76 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.57/47.76 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 459
% 0.57/47.76 # Initial clauses : 412
% 0.57/47.76 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 22
% 0.57/47.76 # Initial clauses in saturation : 390
% 0.57/47.76 # Processed clauses : 1757
% 0.57/47.76 # ...of these trivial : 50
% 0.57/47.76 # ...subsumed : 243
% 0.57/47.76 # ...remaining for further processing : 1464
% 0.57/47.76 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.57/47.76 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.57/47.76 # Backward-subsumed : 19
% 0.57/47.76 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.57/47.76 # Generated clauses : 13893
% 0.57/47.76 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 13472
% 0.57/47.76 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 145
% 0.57/47.76 # Paramodulations : 13892
% 0.57/47.76 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.57/47.76 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.57/47.76 # Current number of processed clauses : 1444
% 0.57/47.76 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 132
% 0.57/47.76 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.57/47.76 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.57/47.76 # Non-unit-clauses : 1310
% 0.57/47.76 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 11712
% 0.57/47.76 # ...number of literals in the above : 115695
% 0.57/47.76 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.57/47.76 # Current number of archived clauses : 20
% 0.57/47.76 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 509863
% 0.57/47.76 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 137524
% 0.57/47.76 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 407
% 0.57/47.76 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 18412
% 0.57/47.76 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.57/47.76 # BW rewrite match attempts : 29
% 0.57/47.76 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.57/47.76 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.57/47.76 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.57/47.76 # Termbank termtop insertions : 193846
% 0.57/47.76
% 0.57/47.76 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.57/47.76 # User time : 0.429 s
% 0.57/47.76 # System time : 0.012 s
% 0.57/47.76 # Total time : 0.441 s
% 0.57/47.76 # Maximum resident set size: 19184 pages
% 0.60/69.53 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.60/69.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.60/69.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.60/69.55 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.60/69.56 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.60/69.56 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.60/69.56 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.60/69.56 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.60/69.57 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.60/69.57 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.60/69.57 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.60/69.57 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.60/69.57 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.60/69.57 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.60/69.57 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.60/69.57 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.60/69.58 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.60/69.58 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.60/69.58 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.60/69.58 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.60/69.58 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.60/69.58 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.60/69.58 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.60/69.58 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.60/69.59 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.60/69.59 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.60/69.59 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.60/69.59 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.60/69.60 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.60/69.60 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.60/69.60 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.60/69.60 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.60/69.61 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.60/69.61 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------