TSTP Solution File: SWB083+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWB083+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 19:02:15 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.55s 47.73s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.55s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 26 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 84 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 15 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 94 ( 36 ~; 39 |; 13 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 15 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 9 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 51 ( 8 sgn 27 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(owl_restrict_allvaluesfrom,axiom,
! [X11,X2,X5] :
( ( iext(uri_owl_allValuesFrom,X11,X5)
& iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X11,X2) )
=> ! [X4] :
( icext(X11,X4)
<=> ! [X7] :
( iext(X2,X4,X7)
=> icext(X5,X7) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_restrict_allvaluesfrom) ).
fof(premise_rdfbased_sem_restrict_allvalues_inst_subj,axiom,
( iext(uri_owl_allValuesFrom,uri_ex_z,uri_ex_c)
& iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_z,uri_ex_p)
& iext(uri_rdfs_range,uri_ex_p,uri_ex_c)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_owl_Thing) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',premise_rdfbased_sem_restrict_allvalues_inst_subj) ).
fof(owl_rdfsext_range,axiom,
! [X2,X5] :
( iext(uri_rdfs_range,X2,X5)
<=> ( ip(X2)
& ip(X5)
& ! [X4,X7] :
( iext(X2,X4,X7)
=> icext(X5,X7) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_rdfsext_range) ).
fof(conclusion_rdfbased_sem_restrict_allvalues_inst_subj,conjecture,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_z),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',conclusion_rdfbased_sem_restrict_allvalues_inst_subj) ).
fof(rdfs_cext_def,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X4,X5)
<=> icext(X5,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',rdfs_cext_def) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X12,X13,X14,X15,X16,X15] :
( ( ~ icext(X12,X15)
| ~ iext(X13,X15,X16)
| icext(X14,X16)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_allValuesFrom,X12,X14)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X12,X13) )
& ( iext(X13,X15,esk64_4(X12,X13,X14,X15))
| icext(X12,X15)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_allValuesFrom,X12,X14)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X12,X13) )
& ( ~ icext(X14,esk64_4(X12,X13,X14,X15))
| icext(X12,X15)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_allValuesFrom,X12,X14)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X12,X13) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_restrict_allvaluesfrom])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( icext(X1,X4)
| iext(X2,X4,esk64_4(X1,X2,X3,X4))
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_allValuesFrom,X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
iext(uri_owl_allValuesFrom,uri_ex_z,uri_ex_c),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_restrict_allvalues_inst_subj]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X8,X9,X10,X11,X8,X9] :
( ( ip(X8)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_range,X8,X9) )
& ( ip(X9)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_range,X8,X9) )
& ( ~ iext(X8,X10,X11)
| icext(X9,X11)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_range,X8,X9) )
& ( iext(X8,esk3_2(X8,X9),esk4_2(X8,X9))
| ~ ip(X8)
| ~ ip(X9)
| iext(uri_rdfs_range,X8,X9) )
& ( ~ icext(X9,esk4_2(X8,X9))
| ~ ip(X8)
| ~ ip(X9)
| iext(uri_rdfs_range,X8,X9) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_rdfsext_range])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( icext(uri_ex_z,X1)
| iext(X2,X1,esk64_4(uri_ex_z,X2,uri_ex_c,X1))
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_z,X2) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_z,uri_ex_p),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_restrict_allvalues_inst_subj]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( icext(X1,X4)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_allValuesFrom,X1,X3)
| ~ icext(X3,esk64_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( icext(X2,X3)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_range,X1,X2)
| ~ iext(X1,X4,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( icext(uri_ex_z,X1)
| iext(uri_ex_p,X1,esk64_4(uri_ex_z,uri_ex_p,uri_ex_c,X1)) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( icext(uri_ex_z,X1)
| ~ icext(uri_ex_c,esk64_4(uri_ex_z,X2,uri_ex_c,X1))
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_z,X2) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_z),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conclusion_rdfbased_sem_restrict_allvalues_inst_subj]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X6,X7,X6,X7] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X6,X7)
| icext(X7,X6) )
& ( ~ icext(X7,X6)
| iext(uri_rdf_type,X6,X7) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdfs_cext_def])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( icext(X1,esk64_4(uri_ex_z,uri_ex_p,uri_ex_c,X2))
| icext(uri_ex_z,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_range,uri_ex_p,X1) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
iext(uri_rdfs_range,uri_ex_p,uri_ex_c),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_restrict_allvalues_inst_subj]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( icext(uri_ex_z,X1)
| ~ icext(uri_ex_c,esk64_4(uri_ex_z,uri_ex_p,uri_ex_c,X1)) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_z),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,X2)
| ~ icext(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
icext(uri_ex_z,X1),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_z),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,uri_ex_z),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : SWB083+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 1 14:26:15 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.41/23.46 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.41/23.46 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.41/23.50 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.41/23.55 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.55/46.51 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.55/46.51 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.55/46.53 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.55/46.58 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.55/47.73 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.55/47.73 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.55/47.73 # Preprocessing time : 0.028 s
% 0.55/47.73
% 0.55/47.73 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.55/47.73 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.55/47.73 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.55/47.73 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 526
% 0.55/47.73 # Initial clauses : 50
% 0.55/47.73 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 12
% 0.55/47.73 # Initial clauses in saturation : 38
% 0.55/47.73 # Processed clauses : 265
% 0.55/47.73 # ...of these trivial : 15
% 0.55/47.73 # ...subsumed : 98
% 0.55/47.73 # ...remaining for further processing : 152
% 0.55/47.73 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Generated clauses : 374
% 0.55/47.73 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 227
% 0.55/47.73 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 24
% 0.55/47.73 # Paramodulations : 374
% 0.55/47.73 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Current number of processed clauses : 152
% 0.55/47.73 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 38
% 0.55/47.73 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.55/47.73 # Non-unit-clauses : 113
% 0.55/47.73 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.55/47.73 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.55/47.73 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6106
% 0.55/47.73 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2124
% 0.55/47.73 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 122
% 0.55/47.73 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 0.55/47.73 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # BW rewrite match attempts : 6
% 0.55/47.73 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Termbank termtop insertions : 14183
% 0.55/47.73
% 0.55/47.73 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.55/47.73 # User time : 0.044 s
% 0.55/47.73 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.55/47.73 # Total time : 0.045 s
% 0.55/47.73 # Maximum resident set size: 4228 pages
% 0.55/47.73 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.55/47.73
% 0.55/47.73 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.55/47.73 # OLD status Res
% 0.55/47.73 # Preprocessing time : 0.089 s
% 0.55/47.73 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_eb48853eb71ccd2a6fdade56c25b63f5692e1a0c for 23 seconds:
% 0.55/47.73
% 0.55/47.73 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.55/47.73 # OLD status Res
% 0.55/47.73 # Preprocessing time : 0.086 s
% 0.55/47.73 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_761a0d093d9701c0eed884aebb46468e8d439c31 for 23 seconds:
% 0.55/47.73 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.2,,,100,1.0)
% 0.55/47.73 # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 0.55/47.73
% 0.55/47.73 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.55/47.73 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.55/47.73 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.55/47.73 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 529
% 0.55/47.73 # Initial clauses : 47
% 0.55/47.73 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 12
% 0.55/47.73 # Initial clauses in saturation : 35
% 0.55/47.73 # Processed clauses : 212
% 0.55/47.73 # ...of these trivial : 12
% 0.55/47.73 # ...subsumed : 77
% 0.55/47.73 # ...remaining for further processing : 123
% 0.55/47.73 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Generated clauses : 327
% 0.55/47.73 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 177
% 0.55/47.73 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 24
% 0.55/47.73 # Paramodulations : 327
% 0.55/47.73 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Current number of processed clauses : 123
% 0.55/47.73 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 36
% 0.55/47.73 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.55/47.73 # Non-unit-clauses : 86
% 0.55/47.73 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.55/47.73 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.55/47.73 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1627
% 0.55/47.73 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 675
% 0.55/47.73 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 101
% 0.55/47.73 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 23
% 0.55/47.73 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # BW rewrite match attempts : 5
% 0.55/47.73 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Termbank termtop insertions : 13099
% 0.55/47.73
% 0.55/47.73 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.55/47.73 # User time : 0.017 s
% 0.55/47.73 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.55/47.73 # Total time : 0.021 s
% 0.55/47.73 # Maximum resident set size: 4216 pages
% 0.55/47.73 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_bb5e3cecdbc7660bd3a6f864cadb7769d8aea26a for 23 seconds:
% 0.55/47.73 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.1,,,500,1.0)
% 0.55/47.73 # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 0.55/47.73
% 0.55/47.73 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.55/47.73 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.55/47.73 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.55/47.73 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 558
% 0.55/47.73 # Initial clauses : 3
% 0.55/47.73 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 0.55/47.73 # Processed clauses : 3
% 0.55/47.73 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # ...remaining for further processing : 3
% 0.55/47.73 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Current number of processed clauses : 3
% 0.55/47.73 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.55/47.73 # Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.55/47.73 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.55/47.73 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Termbank termtop insertions : 7117
% 0.55/47.73
% 0.55/47.73 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.55/47.73 # User time : 0.014 s
% 0.55/47.73 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.55/47.73 # Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.55/47.73 # Maximum resident set size: 3604 pages
% 0.55/47.73 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_e252f7803940d118fa0ef69fc2319cb55aee23b9 for 23 seconds:
% 0.55/47.73 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,1.4,,03,100,1.0)
% 0.55/47.73 # Preprocessing time : 0.016 s
% 0.55/47.73
% 0.55/47.73 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.55/47.73 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.55/47.73 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.55/47.73 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 536
% 0.55/47.73 # Initial clauses : 37
% 0.55/47.73 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 12
% 0.55/47.73 # Initial clauses in saturation : 25
% 0.55/47.73 # Processed clauses : 203
% 0.55/47.73 # ...of these trivial : 14
% 0.55/47.73 # ...subsumed : 52
% 0.55/47.73 # ...remaining for further processing : 137
% 0.55/47.73 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Backward-subsumed : 4
% 0.55/47.73 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Generated clauses : 291
% 0.55/47.73 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 178
% 0.55/47.73 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Paramodulations : 291
% 0.55/47.73 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Current number of processed clauses : 133
% 0.55/47.73 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 31
% 0.55/47.73 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.55/47.73 # Non-unit-clauses : 101
% 0.55/47.73 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.55/47.73 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Current number of archived clauses : 5
% 0.55/47.73 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1237
% 0.55/47.73 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 586
% 0.55/47.73 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 56
% 0.55/47.73 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 21
% 0.55/47.73 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.55/47.73 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Termbank termtop insertions : 13405
% 0.55/47.73
% 0.55/47.73 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.55/47.73 # User time : 0.018 s
% 0.55/47.73 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.55/47.73 # Total time : 0.020 s
% 0.55/47.73 # Maximum resident set size: 4476 pages
% 0.55/47.73 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_b1d72019af42f5b571a6c0b233a5b6d1de064075 for 23 seconds:
% 0.55/47.73 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,02,500,1.0)
% 0.55/47.73 # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 0.55/47.73
% 0.55/47.73 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.55/47.73 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.55/47.73 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.55/47.73 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 540
% 0.55/47.73 # Initial clauses : 29
% 0.55/47.73 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 12
% 0.55/47.73 # Initial clauses in saturation : 17
% 0.55/47.73 # Processed clauses : 45
% 0.55/47.73 # ...of these trivial : 3
% 0.55/47.73 # ...subsumed : 5
% 0.55/47.73 # ...remaining for further processing : 37
% 0.55/47.73 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Generated clauses : 37
% 0.55/47.73 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 28
% 0.55/47.73 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 3
% 0.55/47.73 # Paramodulations : 37
% 0.55/47.73 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Current number of processed clauses : 37
% 0.55/47.73 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 15
% 0.55/47.73 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.55/47.73 # Non-unit-clauses : 20
% 0.55/47.73 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.55/47.73 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.55/47.73 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 61
% 0.55/47.73 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 36
% 0.55/47.73 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 8
% 0.55/47.73 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.55/47.73 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.55/47.73 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Termbank termtop insertions : 8635
% 0.55/47.73
% 0.55/47.73 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.55/47.73 # User time : 0.013 s
% 0.55/47.73 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.55/47.73 # Total time : 0.016 s
% 0.55/47.73 # Maximum resident set size: 3660 pages
% 0.55/47.73 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_e96ef4641ae500918cdd95fcfce21e29f2ac5eec for 23 seconds:
% 0.55/47.73 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,6.0,,03,100,1.0)
% 0.55/47.73 # Preprocessing time : 0.027 s
% 0.55/47.73
% 0.55/47.73 # Proof found!
% 0.55/47.73 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.55/47.73 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.55/47.73 # Proof object total steps : 26
% 0.55/47.73 # Proof object clause steps : 16
% 0.55/47.73 # Proof object formula steps : 10
% 0.55/47.73 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.55/47.73 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.55/47.73 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.55/47.73 # Proof object initial clauses used : 8
% 0.55/47.73 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 0.55/47.73 # Proof object generating inferences : 7
% 0.55/47.73 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 3
% 0.55/47.73 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.55/47.73 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.55/47.73 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 459
% 0.55/47.73 # Initial clauses : 377
% 0.55/47.73 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 21
% 0.55/47.73 # Initial clauses in saturation : 356
% 0.55/47.73 # Processed clauses : 1802
% 0.55/47.73 # ...of these trivial : 87
% 0.55/47.73 # ...subsumed : 293
% 0.55/47.73 # ...remaining for further processing : 1422
% 0.55/47.73 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Backward-subsumed : 8
% 0.55/47.73 # Backward-rewritten : 120
% 0.55/47.73 # Generated clauses : 12813
% 0.55/47.73 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 12258
% 0.55/47.73 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 75
% 0.55/47.73 # Paramodulations : 12813
% 0.55/47.73 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Current number of processed clauses : 1294
% 0.55/47.73 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 177
% 0.55/47.73 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Non-unit-clauses : 1117
% 0.55/47.73 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 10552
% 0.55/47.73 # ...number of literals in the above : 112188
% 0.55/47.73 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Current number of archived clauses : 129
% 0.55/47.73 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 136833
% 0.55/47.73 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 53447
% 0.55/47.73 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 373
% 0.55/47.73 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9987
% 0.55/47.73 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # BW rewrite match attempts : 141
% 0.55/47.73 # BW rewrite match successes : 37
% 0.55/47.73 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.55/47.73 # Termbank termtop insertions : 184748
% 0.55/47.73
% 0.55/47.73 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.55/47.73 # User time : 0.307 s
% 0.55/47.73 # System time : 0.014 s
% 0.55/47.73 # Total time : 0.321 s
% 0.55/47.73 # Maximum resident set size: 18736 pages
% 0.55/69.52 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.55/69.54 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/69.54 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.55 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.55/69.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/69.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/69.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.56 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/69.56 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.56 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.55/69.56 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.57 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/69.57 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.57 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.55/69.57 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.57 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/69.57 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.58 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.55/69.58 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.58 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/69.58 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.58 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/69.58 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.58 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.55/69.58 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.58 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.55/69.58 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.59 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.55/69.59 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.59 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.55/69.59 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.60 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.55/69.60 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.63 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.55/69.65 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/69.65 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.65 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/69.65 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.65 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/69.65 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------