TSTP Solution File: SWB081+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWB081+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 19:02:14 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.55s 47.72s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.55s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 42 ( 14 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 135 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 15 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 150 ( 57 ~; 65 |; 19 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 14 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 9 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 67 ( 4 sgn 31 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(owl_restrict_allvaluesfrom,axiom,
! [X11,X2,X5] :
( ( iext(uri_owl_allValuesFrom,X11,X5)
& iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X11,X2) )
=> ! [X4] :
( icext(X11,X4)
<=> ! [X7] :
( iext(X2,X4,X7)
=> icext(X5,X7) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_restrict_allvaluesfrom) ).
fof(premise_rdfbased_sem_restrict_allvalues_cmp_class,axiom,
( iext(uri_owl_allValuesFrom,uri_ex_x2,uri_ex_c2)
& iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_x2,uri_ex_p)
& iext(uri_owl_allValuesFrom,uri_ex_x1,uri_ex_c1)
& iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_x1,uri_ex_p)
& iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c1,uri_ex_c2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',premise_rdfbased_sem_restrict_allvalues_cmp_class) ).
fof(owl_prop_allvaluesfrom_ext,axiom,
! [X4,X7] :
( iext(uri_owl_allValuesFrom,X4,X7)
=> ( icext(uri_owl_Restriction,X4)
& ic(X7) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_prop_allvaluesfrom_ext) ).
fof(owl_class_restriction_ext,axiom,
! [X4] :
( icext(uri_owl_Restriction,X4)
=> ic(X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_class_restriction_ext) ).
fof(rdfs_subclassof_main,axiom,
! [X5,X6] :
( iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X5,X6)
=> ( ic(X5)
& ic(X6)
& ! [X4] :
( icext(X5,X4)
=> icext(X6,X4) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',rdfs_subclassof_main) ).
fof(owl_rdfsext_subclassof,axiom,
! [X13,X15] :
( iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X13,X15)
<=> ( ic(X13)
& ic(X15)
& ! [X4] :
( icext(X13,X4)
=> icext(X15,X4) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_rdfsext_subclassof) ).
fof(conclusion_rdfbased_sem_restrict_allvalues_cmp_class,conjecture,
iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_x1,uri_ex_x2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',conclusion_rdfbased_sem_restrict_allvalues_cmp_class) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X12,X13,X14,X15,X16,X15] :
( ( ~ icext(X12,X15)
| ~ iext(X13,X15,X16)
| icext(X14,X16)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_allValuesFrom,X12,X14)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X12,X13) )
& ( iext(X13,X15,esk65_4(X12,X13,X14,X15))
| icext(X12,X15)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_allValuesFrom,X12,X14)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X12,X13) )
& ( ~ icext(X14,esk65_4(X12,X13,X14,X15))
| icext(X12,X15)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_allValuesFrom,X12,X14)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X12,X13) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_restrict_allvaluesfrom])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( icext(X1,X4)
| iext(X2,X4,esk65_4(X1,X2,X3,X4))
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_allValuesFrom,X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
iext(uri_owl_allValuesFrom,uri_ex_x2,uri_ex_c2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_restrict_allvalues_cmp_class]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( icext(uri_ex_x2,X1)
| iext(X2,X1,esk65_4(uri_ex_x2,X2,uri_ex_c2,X1))
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_x2,X2) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_x2,uri_ex_p),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_restrict_allvalues_cmp_class]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X8,X9] :
( ( icext(uri_owl_Restriction,X8)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_allValuesFrom,X8,X9) )
& ( ic(X9)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_allValuesFrom,X8,X9) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_prop_allvaluesfrom_ext])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( icext(X3,X4)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_allValuesFrom,X1,X3)
| ~ iext(X2,X5,X4)
| ~ icext(X1,X5) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( icext(uri_ex_x2,X1)
| iext(uri_ex_p,X1,esk65_4(uri_ex_x2,uri_ex_p,uri_ex_c2,X1)) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X5] :
( ~ icext(uri_owl_Restriction,X5)
| ic(X5) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_class_restriction_ext])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( icext(uri_owl_Restriction,X1)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_allValuesFrom,X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
iext(uri_owl_allValuesFrom,uri_ex_x1,uri_ex_c1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_restrict_allvalues_cmp_class]) ).
fof(c_0_18,plain,
! [X7,X8,X9] :
( ( ic(X7)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X7,X8) )
& ( ic(X8)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X7,X8) )
& ( ~ icext(X7,X9)
| icext(X8,X9)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X7,X8) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdfs_subclassof_main])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( icext(X1,esk65_4(uri_ex_x2,uri_ex_p,uri_ex_c2,X2))
| icext(uri_ex_x2,X2)
| ~ icext(X3,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X3,uri_ex_p)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_allValuesFrom,X3,X1) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_x1,uri_ex_p),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_restrict_allvalues_cmp_class]) ).
fof(c_0_21,plain,
! [X16,X17,X18,X16,X17] :
( ( ic(X16)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X16,X17) )
& ( ic(X17)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X16,X17) )
& ( ~ icext(X16,X18)
| icext(X17,X18)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X16,X17) )
& ( icext(X16,esk1_2(X16,X17))
| ~ ic(X16)
| ~ ic(X17)
| iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X16,X17) )
& ( ~ icext(X17,esk1_2(X16,X17))
| ~ ic(X16)
| ~ ic(X17)
| iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X16,X17) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_rdfsext_subclassof])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ic(X1)
| ~ icext(uri_owl_Restriction,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
icext(uri_owl_Restriction,uri_ex_x1),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( icext(X1,X4)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_allValuesFrom,X1,X3)
| ~ icext(X3,esk65_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( icext(X2,X3)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X1,X2)
| ~ icext(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c1,uri_ex_c2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_restrict_allvalues_cmp_class]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( icext(uri_ex_c1,esk65_4(uri_ex_x2,uri_ex_p,uri_ex_c2,X1))
| icext(uri_ex_x2,X1)
| ~ icext(uri_ex_x1,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_17]),c_0_20])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X1,X2)
| icext(X1,esk1_2(X1,X2))
| ~ ic(X2)
| ~ ic(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
ic(uri_ex_x1),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( icext(uri_ex_x2,X1)
| ~ icext(uri_ex_c2,esk65_4(uri_ex_x2,X2,uri_ex_c2,X1))
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_x2,X2) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_9]) ).
fof(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_x1,uri_ex_x2),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conclusion_rdfbased_sem_restrict_allvalues_cmp_class]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( icext(uri_ex_c2,X1)
| ~ icext(uri_ex_c1,X1) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( icext(uri_ex_c1,esk65_4(uri_ex_x2,uri_ex_p,uri_ex_c2,esk1_2(uri_ex_x1,X1)))
| icext(uri_ex_x2,esk1_2(uri_ex_x1,X1))
| iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_x1,X1)
| ~ ic(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29])]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( icext(uri_ex_x2,X1)
| ~ icext(uri_ex_c2,esk65_4(uri_ex_x2,uri_ex_p,uri_ex_c2,X1)) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
icext(uri_owl_Restriction,uri_ex_x2),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_9]) ).
fof(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_x1,uri_ex_x2),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X1,X2)
| ~ ic(X2)
| ~ ic(X1)
| ~ icext(X2,esk1_2(X1,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
( icext(uri_ex_x2,esk1_2(uri_ex_x1,X1))
| iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_x1,X1)
| ~ ic(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
ic(uri_ex_x2),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_x1,uri_ex_x2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_39]),c_0_29])]),c_0_40]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SWB081+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jun 1 06:29:41 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.40/23.44 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.40/23.44 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.40/23.50 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.40/23.54 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.54/46.51 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.54/46.52 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.54/46.54 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.54/46.59 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.55/47.72 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.55/47.72 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.55/47.72 # Preprocessing time : 0.028 s
% 0.55/47.72
% 0.55/47.72 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.55/47.72 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.55/47.72 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.55/47.72 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 523
% 0.55/47.72 # Initial clauses : 59
% 0.55/47.72 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 12
% 0.55/47.72 # Initial clauses in saturation : 47
% 0.55/47.72 # Processed clauses : 421
% 0.55/47.72 # ...of these trivial : 14
% 0.55/47.72 # ...subsumed : 186
% 0.55/47.72 # ...remaining for further processing : 221
% 0.55/47.72 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Generated clauses : 613
% 0.55/47.72 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 374
% 0.55/47.72 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 46
% 0.55/47.72 # Paramodulations : 613
% 0.55/47.72 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Current number of processed clauses : 221
% 0.55/47.72 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 44
% 0.55/47.72 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.55/47.72 # Non-unit-clauses : 176
% 0.55/47.72 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.55/47.72 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.55/47.72 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 13240
% 0.55/47.72 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5112
% 0.55/47.72 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 232
% 0.55/47.72 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 23
% 0.55/47.72 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # BW rewrite match attempts : 6
% 0.55/47.72 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Termbank termtop insertions : 18408
% 0.55/47.72
% 0.55/47.72 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.55/47.72 # User time : 0.052 s
% 0.55/47.72 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.55/47.72 # Total time : 0.058 s
% 0.55/47.72 # Maximum resident set size: 4520 pages
% 0.55/47.72 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.55/47.72
% 0.55/47.72 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.55/47.72 # OLD status Res
% 0.55/47.72 # Preprocessing time : 0.076 s
% 0.55/47.72 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_eb48853eb71ccd2a6fdade56c25b63f5692e1a0c for 23 seconds:
% 0.55/47.72
% 0.55/47.72 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.55/47.72 # OLD status Res
% 0.55/47.72 # Preprocessing time : 0.087 s
% 0.55/47.72 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_761a0d093d9701c0eed884aebb46468e8d439c31 for 23 seconds:
% 0.55/47.72 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.2,,,100,1.0)
% 0.55/47.72 # Preprocessing time : 0.029 s
% 0.55/47.72
% 0.55/47.72 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.55/47.72 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.55/47.72 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.55/47.72 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 524
% 0.55/47.72 # Initial clauses : 58
% 0.55/47.72 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 12
% 0.55/47.72 # Initial clauses in saturation : 46
% 0.55/47.72 # Processed clauses : 363
% 0.55/47.72 # ...of these trivial : 16
% 0.55/47.72 # ...subsumed : 158
% 0.55/47.72 # ...remaining for further processing : 189
% 0.55/47.72 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Generated clauses : 554
% 0.55/47.72 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 317
% 0.55/47.72 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 44
% 0.55/47.72 # Paramodulations : 554
% 0.55/47.72 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Current number of processed clauses : 189
% 0.55/47.72 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 44
% 0.55/47.72 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.55/47.72 # Non-unit-clauses : 144
% 0.55/47.72 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.55/47.72 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.55/47.72 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4780
% 0.55/47.72 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1946
% 0.55/47.72 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 202
% 0.55/47.72 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 118
% 0.55/47.72 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # BW rewrite match attempts : 14
% 0.55/47.72 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Termbank termtop insertions : 17059
% 0.55/47.72
% 0.55/47.72 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.55/47.72 # User time : 0.045 s
% 0.55/47.72 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.55/47.72 # Total time : 0.050 s
% 0.55/47.72 # Maximum resident set size: 4516 pages
% 0.55/47.72 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_bb5e3cecdbc7660bd3a6f864cadb7769d8aea26a for 23 seconds:
% 0.55/47.72 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.1,,,500,1.0)
% 0.55/47.72 # Preprocessing time : 0.028 s
% 0.55/47.72
% 0.55/47.72 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.55/47.72 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.55/47.72 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.55/47.72 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 540
% 0.55/47.72 # Initial clauses : 31
% 0.55/47.72 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 12
% 0.55/47.72 # Initial clauses in saturation : 19
% 0.55/47.72 # Processed clauses : 25
% 0.55/47.72 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.55/47.72 # ...subsumed : 5
% 0.55/47.72 # ...remaining for further processing : 18
% 0.55/47.72 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Generated clauses : 12
% 0.55/47.72 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 6
% 0.55/47.72 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Paramodulations : 12
% 0.55/47.72 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Current number of processed clauses : 18
% 0.55/47.72 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 6
% 0.55/47.72 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.55/47.72 # Non-unit-clauses : 11
% 0.55/47.72 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.55/47.72 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.55/47.72 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 13
% 0.55/47.72 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12
% 0.55/47.72 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 5
% 0.55/47.72 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.55/47.72 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Termbank termtop insertions : 8399
% 0.55/47.72
% 0.55/47.72 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.55/47.72 # User time : 0.026 s
% 0.55/47.72 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.55/47.72 # Total time : 0.029 s
% 0.55/47.72 # Maximum resident set size: 3672 pages
% 0.55/47.72 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_e252f7803940d118fa0ef69fc2319cb55aee23b9 for 23 seconds:
% 0.55/47.72 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,1.4,,03,100,1.0)
% 0.55/47.72 # Preprocessing time : 0.014 s
% 0.55/47.72
% 0.55/47.72 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.55/47.72 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.55/47.72 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.55/47.72 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 533
% 0.55/47.72 # Initial clauses : 46
% 0.55/47.72 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 12
% 0.55/47.72 # Initial clauses in saturation : 34
% 0.55/47.72 # Processed clauses : 267
% 0.55/47.72 # ...of these trivial : 10
% 0.55/47.72 # ...subsumed : 95
% 0.55/47.72 # ...remaining for further processing : 162
% 0.55/47.72 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Backward-subsumed : 4
% 0.55/47.72 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Generated clauses : 335
% 0.55/47.72 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 233
% 0.55/47.72 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Paramodulations : 335
% 0.55/47.72 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Current number of processed clauses : 158
% 0.55/47.72 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 34
% 0.55/47.72 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.55/47.72 # Non-unit-clauses : 123
% 0.55/47.72 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.55/47.72 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Current number of archived clauses : 5
% 0.55/47.72 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 966
% 0.55/47.72 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 394
% 0.55/47.72 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 99
% 0.55/47.72 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 72
% 0.55/47.72 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.55/47.72 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Termbank termtop insertions : 15100
% 0.55/47.72
% 0.55/47.72 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.55/47.72 # User time : 0.017 s
% 0.55/47.72 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.55/47.72 # Total time : 0.019 s
% 0.55/47.72 # Maximum resident set size: 4500 pages
% 0.55/47.72 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_b1d72019af42f5b571a6c0b233a5b6d1de064075 for 23 seconds:
% 0.55/47.72 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,02,500,1.0)
% 0.55/47.72 # Preprocessing time : 0.013 s
% 0.55/47.72
% 0.55/47.72 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.55/47.72 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.55/47.72 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.55/47.72 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 529
% 0.55/47.72 # Initial clauses : 51
% 0.55/47.72 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Initial clauses in saturation : 51
% 0.55/47.72 # Processed clauses : 526
% 0.55/47.72 # ...of these trivial : 24
% 0.55/47.72 # ...subsumed : 252
% 0.55/47.72 # ...remaining for further processing : 250
% 0.55/47.72 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Generated clauses : 648
% 0.55/47.72 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 475
% 0.55/47.72 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 102
% 0.55/47.72 # Paramodulations : 648
% 0.55/47.72 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Current number of processed clauses : 250
% 0.55/47.72 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 53
% 0.55/47.72 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.55/47.72 # Non-unit-clauses : 196
% 0.55/47.72 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.55/47.72 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 10460
% 0.55/47.72 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3619
% 0.55/47.72 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 354
% 0.55/47.72 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 162
% 0.55/47.72 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # BW rewrite match attempts : 17
% 0.55/47.72 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Termbank termtop insertions : 18766
% 0.55/47.72
% 0.55/47.72 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.55/47.72 # User time : 0.027 s
% 0.55/47.72 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.55/47.72 # Total time : 0.029 s
% 0.55/47.72 # Maximum resident set size: 4496 pages
% 0.55/47.72 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_e96ef4641ae500918cdd95fcfce21e29f2ac5eec for 23 seconds:
% 0.55/47.72 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,6.0,,03,100,1.0)
% 0.55/47.72 # Preprocessing time : 0.049 s
% 0.55/47.72
% 0.55/47.72 # Proof found!
% 0.55/47.72 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.55/47.72 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.55/47.72 # Proof object total steps : 42
% 0.55/47.72 # Proof object clause steps : 28
% 0.55/47.72 # Proof object formula steps : 14
% 0.55/47.72 # Proof object conjectures : 4
% 0.55/47.72 # Proof object clause conjectures : 1
% 0.55/47.72 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.55/47.72 # Proof object initial clauses used : 14
% 0.55/47.72 # Proof object initial formulas used : 7
% 0.55/47.72 # Proof object generating inferences : 14
% 0.55/47.72 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 9
% 0.55/47.72 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.55/47.72 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.55/47.72 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 459
% 0.55/47.72 # Initial clauses : 354
% 0.55/47.72 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 20
% 0.55/47.72 # Initial clauses in saturation : 334
% 0.55/47.72 # Processed clauses : 2293
% 0.55/47.72 # ...of these trivial : 78
% 0.55/47.72 # ...subsumed : 402
% 0.55/47.72 # ...remaining for further processing : 1813
% 0.55/47.72 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Backward-subsumed : 17
% 0.55/47.72 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Generated clauses : 15208
% 0.55/47.72 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 14545
% 0.55/47.72 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 143
% 0.55/47.72 # Paramodulations : 15208
% 0.55/47.72 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Current number of processed clauses : 1796
% 0.55/47.72 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 179
% 0.55/47.72 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.55/47.72 # Non-unit-clauses : 1616
% 0.55/47.72 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 12562
% 0.55/47.72 # ...number of literals in the above : 136722
% 0.55/47.72 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Current number of archived clauses : 18
% 0.55/47.72 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 358889
% 0.55/47.72 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 131158
% 0.55/47.72 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 562
% 0.55/47.72 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 14752
% 0.55/47.72 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # BW rewrite match attempts : 41
% 0.55/47.72 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.55/47.72 # Termbank termtop insertions : 219726
% 0.55/47.72
% 0.55/47.72 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.55/47.72 # User time : 0.484 s
% 0.55/47.72 # System time : 0.008 s
% 0.55/47.72 # Total time : 0.492 s
% 0.55/47.72 # Maximum resident set size: 21576 pages
% 0.55/69.56 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.55/69.57 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.55/69.58 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/69.58 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.59 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/69.59 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.59 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.55/69.59 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.59 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/69.59 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.59 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.55/69.59 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.60 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/69.60 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.60 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.55/69.60 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.60 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/69.60 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.60 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.55/69.60 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.61 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/69.61 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.61 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.55/69.61 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.61 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/69.61 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.61 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.55/69.61 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.62 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/69.62 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.62 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.55/69.62 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.63 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.55/69.63 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.67 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.55/69.69 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/69.69 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.70 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/69.70 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.70 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/69.70 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------