TSTP Solution File: SWB075+1 by ePrincess---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ePrincess---1.0
% Problem  : SWB075+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 18:59:49 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 250.03s 170.13s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SWB075+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.13/0.13  % Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jun  1 04:04:25 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.61/0.59          ____       _                          
% 0.61/0.59    ___  / __ \_____(_)___  ________  __________
% 0.61/0.59   / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/
% 0.61/0.59  /  __/ ____/ /  / / / / / /__/  __(__  |__  ) 
% 0.61/0.59  \___/_/   /_/  /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/  
% 0.61/0.59  
% 0.61/0.59  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic
% 0.61/0.59  (ePrincess v.1.0)
% 0.61/0.59  
% 0.61/0.59  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015
% 0.61/0.59  (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015
% 0.61/0.59  (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner)
% 0.61/0.59  Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
% 0.61/0.59  Bug reports to peter@backeman.se
% 0.61/0.59  
% 0.61/0.59  For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/
% 0.61/0.59  
% 0.61/0.59  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.77/0.64  Prover 0: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 3.61/1.37  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 7.97/2.31  Prover 0: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 7.97/2.39  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 18.78/5.93  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 20.12/6.27  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 24.79/7.31  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 29.96/8.53  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 31.15/8.84  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 46.33/12.68  Prover 2: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 46.96/12.85  Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 63.07/17.99  Prover 0: stopped
% 63.41/18.19  Prover 3: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 63.82/18.38  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 64.51/18.58  Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 64.64/18.61  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 106.49/57.44  Prover 3: stopped
% 106.75/57.64  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=complete
% 107.40/57.94  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 113.10/60.62  Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 113.39/60.73  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 160.13/102.46  Prover 2: stopped
% 160.36/102.66  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 160.88/102.90  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 167.11/105.19  Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 175.31/111.62  Prover 5: stopped
% 175.53/111.82  Prover 6: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 175.73/112.03  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 179.81/114.95  Prover 6: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 180.40/115.11  Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ...
% 198.10/131.51  Prover 1: stopped
% 198.33/131.71  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -resolutionMethod=normal -ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 198.64/131.97  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 199.56/132.21  Prover 7: Proving ...
% 234.56/160.69  Prover 4: stopped
% 234.79/160.89  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal -ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 235.29/161.13  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 237.05/161.51  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 250.01/170.13  Prover 8: proved (9239ms)
% 250.03/170.13  Prover 6: stopped
% 250.03/170.13  Prover 7: stopped
% 250.03/170.13  
% 250.03/170.13  No countermodel exists, formula is valid
% 250.03/170.13  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 250.03/170.13  
% 250.03/170.13  Generating proof ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------