TSTP Solution File: SWB058+1 by ePrincess---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ePrincess---1.0
% Problem  : SWB058+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 18:59:47 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 269.08s 175.78s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SWB058+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jun  1 00:31:06 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.59          ____       _                          
% 0.20/0.59    ___  / __ \_____(_)___  ________  __________
% 0.20/0.59   / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/
% 0.20/0.59  /  __/ ____/ /  / / / / / /__/  __(__  |__  ) 
% 0.20/0.59  \___/_/   /_/  /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/  
% 0.20/0.59  
% 0.20/0.59  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic
% 0.20/0.59  (ePrincess v.1.0)
% 0.20/0.59  
% 0.20/0.59  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015
% 0.20/0.59  (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015
% 0.20/0.59  (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner)
% 0.20/0.59  Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
% 0.20/0.59  Bug reports to peter@backeman.se
% 0.20/0.59  
% 0.20/0.59  For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/
% 0.20/0.59  
% 0.20/0.59  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.71/0.64  Prover 0: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 3.62/1.37  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 7.46/2.27  Prover 0: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 7.89/2.34  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 18.80/5.93  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 20.28/6.29  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 24.43/7.26  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 30.02/8.53  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 30.87/8.79  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 45.63/12.76  Prover 2: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 46.66/12.98  Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 61.02/18.27  Prover 0: stopped
% 61.42/18.47  Prover 3: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 62.09/18.73  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 62.55/18.89  Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 62.82/18.92  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 105.18/57.63  Prover 3: stopped
% 105.38/57.83  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=complete
% 105.90/58.06  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 112.17/60.85  Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 112.43/60.96  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 160.73/101.90  Prover 2: stopped
% 160.99/102.11  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 161.46/102.34  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 165.85/104.33  Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 173.85/111.27  Prover 5: stopped
% 174.07/111.47  Prover 6: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 174.26/111.68  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 179.14/114.80  Prover 6: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 179.80/114.94  Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ...
% 205.78/131.16  Prover 1: stopped
% 206.00/131.36  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -resolutionMethod=normal -ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 206.32/131.61  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 207.45/131.86  Prover 7: Proving ...
% 246.23/160.75  Prover 4: stopped
% 246.39/160.95  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal -ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 247.14/161.21  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 248.64/161.61  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 269.08/175.78  Prover 8: proved (14832ms)
% 269.08/175.78  Prover 6: stopped
% 269.08/175.78  Prover 7: stopped
% 269.08/175.78  
% 269.08/175.78  No countermodel exists, formula is valid
% 269.08/175.78  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 269.08/175.78  
% 269.08/175.78  Generating proof ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------