TSTP Solution File: SWB056+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWB056+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 19:02:11 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.57s 47.73s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.57s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 34 ( 16 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 140 ( 29 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 53 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 177 ( 71 ~; 75 |; 25 &)
% ( 5 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 23 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 14 ( 14 usr; 13 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 54 ( 7 sgn 31 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(owl_enum_class_002,axiom,
! [X11,X12,X21,X14,X22] :
( ( iext(uri_rdf_first,X12,X21)
& iext(uri_rdf_rest,X12,X14)
& iext(uri_rdf_first,X14,X22)
& iext(uri_rdf_rest,X14,uri_rdf_nil) )
=> ( iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X11,X12)
<=> ( ic(X11)
& ! [X4] :
( icext(X11,X4)
<=> ( X4 = X21
| X4 = X22 ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_enum_class_002) ).
fof(premise_rdfbased_sem_enum_inst_closed,axiom,
? [X42,X37] :
( iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_z,uri_ex_e)
& iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_z,uri_ex_x)
& iext(uri_owl_oneOf,uri_ex_e,X42)
& iext(uri_rdf_first,X42,uri_ex_x)
& iext(uri_rdf_rest,X42,X37)
& iext(uri_rdf_first,X37,uri_ex_y)
& iext(uri_rdf_rest,X37,uri_rdf_nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',premise_rdfbased_sem_enum_inst_closed) ).
fof(rdfs_cext_def,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X4,X5)
<=> icext(X5,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',rdfs_cext_def) ).
fof(conclusion_rdfbased_sem_enum_inst_closed,conjecture,
iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_z,uri_ex_y),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',conclusion_rdfbased_sem_enum_inst_closed) ).
fof(owl_eqdis_sameas,axiom,
! [X4,X7] :
( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X4,X7)
<=> X4 = X7 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_eqdis_sameas) ).
fof(owl_eqdis_differentfrom,axiom,
! [X4,X7] :
( iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X4,X7)
<=> X4 != X7 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_eqdis_differentfrom) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X23,X24,X25,X26,X27,X28,X28] :
( ( ic(X23)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X23,X24)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X24,X25)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X24,X26)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X26,X27)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X26,uri_rdf_nil) )
& ( ~ icext(X23,X28)
| X28 = X25
| X28 = X27
| ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X23,X24)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X24,X25)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X24,X26)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X26,X27)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X26,uri_rdf_nil) )
& ( X28 != X25
| icext(X23,X28)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X23,X24)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X24,X25)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X24,X26)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X26,X27)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X26,uri_rdf_nil) )
& ( X28 != X27
| icext(X23,X28)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X23,X24)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X24,X25)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X24,X26)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X26,X27)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X26,uri_rdf_nil) )
& ( esk11_5(X23,X24,X25,X26,X27) != X25
| ~ icext(X23,esk11_5(X23,X24,X25,X26,X27))
| ~ ic(X23)
| iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X23,X24)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X24,X25)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X24,X26)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X26,X27)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X26,uri_rdf_nil) )
& ( esk11_5(X23,X24,X25,X26,X27) != X27
| ~ icext(X23,esk11_5(X23,X24,X25,X26,X27))
| ~ ic(X23)
| iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X23,X24)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X24,X25)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X24,X26)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X26,X27)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X26,uri_rdf_nil) )
& ( icext(X23,esk11_5(X23,X24,X25,X26,X27))
| esk11_5(X23,X24,X25,X26,X27) = X25
| esk11_5(X23,X24,X25,X26,X27) = X27
| ~ ic(X23)
| iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X23,X24)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X24,X25)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X24,X26)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X26,X27)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X26,uri_rdf_nil) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_enum_class_002])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
( iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_z,uri_ex_e)
& iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_z,uri_ex_x)
& iext(uri_owl_oneOf,uri_ex_e,esk1_0)
& iext(uri_rdf_first,esk1_0,uri_ex_x)
& iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk1_0,esk2_0)
& iext(uri_rdf_first,esk2_0,uri_ex_y)
& iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk2_0,uri_rdf_nil) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_enum_inst_closed])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( X6 = X2
| X6 = X4
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X1,uri_rdf_nil)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X3,X1)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X3,X4)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X5,X3)
| ~ icext(X5,X6) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_first,esk1_0,uri_ex_x),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( uri_ex_x = X1
| X2 = X1
| ~ icext(X3,X1)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X4,uri_rdf_nil)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk1_0,X4)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X3,esk1_0)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X4,X2) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_first,esk2_0,uri_ex_y),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk2_0,uri_rdf_nil),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X6,X7,X6,X7] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X6,X7)
| icext(X7,X6) )
& ( ~ icext(X7,X6)
| iext(uri_rdf_type,X6,X7) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdfs_cext_def])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_z,uri_ex_y),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conclusion_rdfbased_sem_enum_inst_closed]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( uri_ex_y = X1
| uri_ex_x = X1
| ~ icext(X2,X1)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X2,esk1_0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_13])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
iext(uri_owl_oneOf,uri_ex_e,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( icext(X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_z,uri_ex_e),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_20,plain,
! [X8,X9,X8,X9] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X8,X9)
| X8 = X9 )
& ( X8 != X9
| iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X8,X9) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_eqdis_sameas])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_z,uri_ex_y),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( uri_ex_x = X1
| uri_ex_y = X1
| ~ icext(uri_ex_e,X1) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
icext(uri_ex_e,uri_ex_z),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X2)
| X1 != X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
fof(c_0_25,plain,
! [X8,X9,X8,X9] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X8,X9)
| X8 != X9 )
& ( X8 = X9
| iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X8,X9) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_eqdis_differentfrom])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_z,uri_ex_y),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( uri_ex_y = uri_ex_z
| uri_ex_x = uri_ex_z ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X1),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( X1 != X2
| ~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_z,uri_ex_x),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
uri_ex_x = uri_ex_z,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28])]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X1,X1),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_32]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : SWB056+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 1 03:18:22 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.42/23.45 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.42/23.45 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.42/23.48 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.42/23.55 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.56/46.49 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.56/46.50 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.56/46.51 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.56/46.58 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.57/47.73 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.57/47.73 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.57/47.73 # Preprocessing time : 0.027 s
% 0.57/47.73
% 0.57/47.73 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.57/47.73 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.57/47.73 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.57/47.73 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 544
% 0.57/47.73 # Initial clauses : 19
% 0.57/47.73 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 11
% 0.57/47.73 # Initial clauses in saturation : 8
% 0.57/47.73 # Processed clauses : 9
% 0.57/47.73 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # ...remaining for further processing : 9
% 0.57/47.73 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.57/47.73 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Generated clauses : 2
% 0.57/47.73 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1
% 0.57/47.73 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Paramodulations : 1
% 0.57/47.73 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.57/47.73 # Current number of processed clauses : 8
% 0.57/47.73 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 0.57/47.73 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.57/47.73 # Non-unit-clauses : 4
% 0.57/47.73 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.57/47.73 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.57/47.73 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.57/47.73 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Termbank termtop insertions : 7639
% 0.57/47.73
% 0.57/47.73 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.57/47.73 # User time : 0.026 s
% 0.57/47.73 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.57/47.73 # Total time : 0.027 s
% 0.57/47.73 # Maximum resident set size: 3644 pages
% 0.57/47.73 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.57/47.73
% 0.57/47.73 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.57/47.73 # OLD status Res
% 0.57/47.73 # Preprocessing time : 0.090 s
% 0.57/47.73 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_eb48853eb71ccd2a6fdade56c25b63f5692e1a0c for 23 seconds:
% 0.57/47.73
% 0.57/47.73 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.57/47.73 # OLD status Res
% 0.57/47.73 # Preprocessing time : 0.045 s
% 0.57/47.73 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_761a0d093d9701c0eed884aebb46468e8d439c31 for 23 seconds:
% 0.57/47.73 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.2,,,100,1.0)
% 0.57/47.73 # Preprocessing time : 0.028 s
% 0.57/47.73
% 0.57/47.73 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.57/47.73 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.57/47.73 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.57/47.73 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 547
% 0.57/47.73 # Initial clauses : 16
% 0.57/47.73 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 11
% 0.57/47.73 # Initial clauses in saturation : 5
% 0.57/47.73 # Processed clauses : 6
% 0.57/47.73 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # ...remaining for further processing : 6
% 0.57/47.73 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.57/47.73 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Generated clauses : 2
% 0.57/47.73 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1
% 0.57/47.73 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Paramodulations : 1
% 0.57/47.73 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.57/47.73 # Current number of processed clauses : 5
% 0.57/47.73 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.57/47.73 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.57/47.73 # Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.57/47.73 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.57/47.73 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.57/47.73 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.57/47.73 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Termbank termtop insertions : 7522
% 0.57/47.73
% 0.57/47.73 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.57/47.73 # User time : 0.023 s
% 0.57/47.73 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.57/47.73 # Total time : 0.028 s
% 0.57/47.73 # Maximum resident set size: 3632 pages
% 0.57/47.73 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_bb5e3cecdbc7660bd3a6f864cadb7769d8aea26a for 23 seconds:
% 0.57/47.73 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.1,,,500,1.0)
% 0.57/47.73 # Preprocessing time : 0.027 s
% 0.57/47.73
% 0.57/47.73 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.57/47.73 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.57/47.73 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.57/47.73 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 547
% 0.57/47.73 # Initial clauses : 16
% 0.57/47.73 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 11
% 0.57/47.73 # Initial clauses in saturation : 5
% 0.57/47.73 # Processed clauses : 6
% 0.57/47.73 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # ...remaining for further processing : 6
% 0.57/47.73 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.57/47.73 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Generated clauses : 2
% 0.57/47.73 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1
% 0.57/47.73 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Paramodulations : 1
% 0.57/47.73 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.57/47.73 # Current number of processed clauses : 5
% 0.57/47.73 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.57/47.73 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.57/47.73 # Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.57/47.73 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.57/47.73 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.57/47.73 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.57/47.73 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Termbank termtop insertions : 7522
% 0.57/47.73
% 0.57/47.73 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.57/47.73 # User time : 0.022 s
% 0.57/47.73 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.57/47.73 # Total time : 0.027 s
% 0.57/47.73 # Maximum resident set size: 3640 pages
% 0.57/47.73 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_e252f7803940d118fa0ef69fc2319cb55aee23b9 for 23 seconds:
% 0.57/47.73 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,1.4,,03,100,1.0)
% 0.57/47.73 # Preprocessing time : 0.028 s
% 0.57/47.73
% 0.57/47.73 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.57/47.73 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.57/47.73 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.57/47.73 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 546
% 0.57/47.73 # Initial clauses : 17
% 0.57/47.73 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 11
% 0.57/47.73 # Initial clauses in saturation : 6
% 0.57/47.73 # Processed clauses : 7
% 0.57/47.73 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # ...remaining for further processing : 7
% 0.57/47.73 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.57/47.73 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Generated clauses : 2
% 0.57/47.73 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1
% 0.57/47.73 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Paramodulations : 1
% 0.57/47.73 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.57/47.73 # Current number of processed clauses : 6
% 0.57/47.73 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.57/47.73 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.57/47.73 # Non-unit-clauses : 3
% 0.57/47.73 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.57/47.73 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.57/47.73 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.57/47.73 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Termbank termtop insertions : 7590
% 0.57/47.73
% 0.57/47.73 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.57/47.73 # User time : 0.024 s
% 0.57/47.73 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.57/47.73 # Total time : 0.028 s
% 0.57/47.73 # Maximum resident set size: 3904 pages
% 0.57/47.73 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_b1d72019af42f5b571a6c0b233a5b6d1de064075 for 23 seconds:
% 0.57/47.73 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,02,500,1.0)
% 0.57/47.73 # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 0.57/47.73
% 0.57/47.73 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.57/47.73 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.57/47.73 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.57/47.73 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 547
% 0.57/47.73 # Initial clauses : 16
% 0.57/47.73 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 11
% 0.57/47.73 # Initial clauses in saturation : 5
% 0.57/47.73 # Processed clauses : 6
% 0.57/47.73 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # ...remaining for further processing : 6
% 0.57/47.73 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.57/47.73 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Generated clauses : 2
% 0.57/47.73 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1
% 0.57/47.73 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Paramodulations : 1
% 0.57/47.73 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.57/47.73 # Current number of processed clauses : 5
% 0.57/47.73 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.57/47.73 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.57/47.73 # Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.57/47.73 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.57/47.73 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.57/47.73 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.57/47.73 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Termbank termtop insertions : 7522
% 0.57/47.73
% 0.57/47.73 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.57/47.73 # User time : 0.012 s
% 0.57/47.73 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.57/47.73 # Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.57/47.73 # Maximum resident set size: 3644 pages
% 0.57/47.73 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_e96ef4641ae500918cdd95fcfce21e29f2ac5eec for 23 seconds:
% 0.57/47.73 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,6.0,,03,100,1.0)
% 0.57/47.73 # Preprocessing time : 0.027 s
% 0.57/47.73
% 0.57/47.73 # Proof found!
% 0.57/47.73 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.57/47.73 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.57/47.73 # Proof object total steps : 34
% 0.57/47.73 # Proof object clause steps : 21
% 0.57/47.73 # Proof object formula steps : 13
% 0.57/47.73 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.57/47.73 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.57/47.73 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.57/47.73 # Proof object initial clauses used : 12
% 0.57/47.73 # Proof object initial formulas used : 6
% 0.57/47.73 # Proof object generating inferences : 6
% 0.57/47.73 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 9
% 0.57/47.73 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.57/47.73 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.57/47.73 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 459
% 0.57/47.73 # Initial clauses : 342
% 0.57/47.73 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 24
% 0.57/47.73 # Initial clauses in saturation : 318
% 0.57/47.73 # Processed clauses : 1763
% 0.57/47.73 # ...of these trivial : 56
% 0.57/47.73 # ...subsumed : 313
% 0.57/47.73 # ...remaining for further processing : 1394
% 0.57/47.73 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 12
% 0.57/47.73 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Backward-subsumed : 6
% 0.57/47.73 # Backward-rewritten : 56
% 0.57/47.73 # Generated clauses : 7902
% 0.57/47.73 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 7554
% 0.57/47.73 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 390
% 0.57/47.73 # Paramodulations : 7890
% 0.57/47.73 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Equation resolutions : 12
% 0.57/47.73 # Current number of processed clauses : 1320
% 0.57/47.73 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 132
% 0.57/47.73 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.57/47.73 # Non-unit-clauses : 1185
% 0.57/47.73 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 5801
% 0.57/47.73 # ...number of literals in the above : 63506
% 0.57/47.73 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Current number of archived clauses : 63
% 0.57/47.73 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 266140
% 0.57/47.73 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 79604
% 0.57/47.73 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 709
% 0.57/47.73 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9497
% 0.57/47.73 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # BW rewrite match attempts : 18
% 0.57/47.73 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.57/47.73 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.57/47.73 # Termbank termtop insertions : 125332
% 0.57/47.73
% 0.57/47.73 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.57/47.73 # User time : 0.245 s
% 0.57/47.73 # System time : 0.011 s
% 0.57/47.73 # Total time : 0.256 s
% 0.57/47.73 # Maximum resident set size: 13404 pages
% 0.57/69.50 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.57/69.52 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/69.52 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/69.53 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.57/69.53 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/69.53 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/69.53 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/69.53 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/69.54 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/69.54 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/69.54 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.57/69.54 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/69.54 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/69.54 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/69.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/69.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/69.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.57/69.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/69.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/69.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/69.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.57/69.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/69.56 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/69.56 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/69.56 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.57/69.56 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/69.57 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.57/69.57 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/69.57 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.57/69.57 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/69.58 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.57/69.58 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/69.58 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.57/69.58 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/69.64 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.57/69.66 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/69.66 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/69.67 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/69.67 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/69.67 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/69.67 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------