TSTP Solution File: SWB054+1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SWB054+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:38:41 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.55s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 27 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 66 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 15 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 65 ( 26 ~; 25 |; 9 &)
% ( 4 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 14 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 29 ( 2 sgn; 18 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(owl_class_thing_ext,axiom,
! [X4] :
( icext(uri_owl_Thing,X4)
<=> ir(X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.EGBp1szPup/E---3.1_3733.p',owl_class_thing_ext) ).
fof(simple_ir,axiom,
! [X4] : ir(X4),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.EGBp1szPup/E---3.1_3733.p',simple_ir) ).
fof(owl_rdfsext_subclassof,axiom,
! [X13,X15] :
( iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X13,X15)
<=> ( ic(X13)
& ic(X15)
& ! [X4] :
( icext(X13,X4)
=> icext(X15,X4) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.EGBp1szPup/E---3.1_3733.p',owl_rdfsext_subclassof) ).
fof(owl_class_thing_type,axiom,
ic(uri_owl_Thing),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.EGBp1szPup/E---3.1_3733.p',owl_class_thing_type) ).
fof(owl_class_classowl_ext,axiom,
! [X4] :
( icext(uri_owl_Class,X4)
<=> ic(X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.EGBp1szPup/E---3.1_3733.p',owl_class_classowl_ext) ).
fof(rdfs_cext_def,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X4,X5)
<=> icext(X5,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.EGBp1szPup/E---3.1_3733.p',rdfs_cext_def) ).
fof(conclusion_rdfbased_sem_class_thing_term,conjecture,
iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c,uri_owl_Thing),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.EGBp1szPup/E---3.1_3733.p',conclusion_rdfbased_sem_class_thing_term) ).
fof(premise_rdfbased_sem_class_thing_term,axiom,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_c,uri_owl_Class),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.EGBp1szPup/E---3.1_3733.p',premise_rdfbased_sem_class_thing_term) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X42] :
( ( ~ icext(uri_owl_Thing,X42)
| ir(X42) )
& ( ~ ir(X42)
| icext(uri_owl_Thing,X42) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_class_thing_ext])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X57] : ir(X57),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[simple_ir]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X51,X52,X53,X54,X55] :
( ( ic(X51)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X51,X52) )
& ( ic(X52)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X51,X52) )
& ( ~ icext(X51,X53)
| icext(X52,X53)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X51,X52) )
& ( icext(X54,esk1_2(X54,X55))
| ~ ic(X54)
| ~ ic(X55)
| iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X54,X55) )
& ( ~ icext(X55,esk1_2(X54,X55))
| ~ ic(X54)
| ~ ic(X55)
| iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X54,X55) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_rdfsext_subclassof])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( icext(uri_owl_Thing,X1)
| ~ ir(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
ir(X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X2,X1)
| ~ icext(X1,esk1_2(X2,X1))
| ~ ic(X2)
| ~ ic(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
icext(uri_owl_Thing,X1),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
ic(uri_owl_Thing),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[owl_class_thing_type]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X69] :
( ( ~ icext(uri_owl_Class,X69)
| ic(X69) )
& ( ~ ic(X69)
| icext(uri_owl_Class,X69) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_class_classowl_ext])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X1,uri_owl_Thing)
| ~ ic(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ic(X1)
| ~ icext(uri_owl_Class,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
fof(c_0_19,plain,
! [X71,X72] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X71,X72)
| icext(X72,X71) )
& ( ~ icext(X72,X71)
| iext(uri_rdf_type,X71,X72) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdfs_cext_def])]) ).
fof(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c,uri_owl_Thing),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conclusion_rdfbased_sem_class_thing_term])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X1,uri_owl_Thing)
| ~ icext(uri_owl_Class,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( icext(X2,X1)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c,uri_owl_Thing),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X1,uri_owl_Thing)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,uri_owl_Class) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_c,uri_owl_Class),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_class_thing_term]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SWB054+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.36 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.36 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.13/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 20:43:59 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.52 Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.52 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.EGBp1szPup/E---3.1_3733.p
% 0.20/0.55 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.20/0.55 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.55 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.55 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.20/0.55 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.20/0.55 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.20/0.55 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.55 # new_bool_3 with pid 3814 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.55 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.20/0.55 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.55 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.55 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.20/0.55 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.20/0.55 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.55 # Search class: FGUNF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.55 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.20/0.55 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 361s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.55 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 61s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.55 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 3818 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.55 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.20/0.55 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.55 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.55 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.20/0.55 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.20/0.55 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.55 # Search class: FGUNF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.55 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.20/0.55 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 361s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.55 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.55 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.55
% 0.20/0.55 # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.55 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.55 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.55 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.20/0.55 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 506
% 0.20/0.55 # Initial clauses : 81
% 0.20/0.55 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.20/0.55 # Initial clauses in saturation : 81
% 0.20/0.55 # Processed clauses : 290
% 0.20/0.55 # ...of these trivial : 35
% 0.20/0.55 # ...subsumed : 30
% 0.20/0.55 # ...remaining for further processing : 225
% 0.20/0.55 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.20/0.55 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.55 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.55 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.20/0.55 # Generated clauses : 458
% 0.20/0.55 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 259
% 0.20/0.55 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.55 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.20/0.55 # Paramodulations : 458
% 0.20/0.55 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/0.55 # NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.55 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.20/0.55 # Total rewrite steps : 254
% 0.20/0.55 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.55 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.55 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.55 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.55 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.55 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.55 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.55 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.55 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.55 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.55 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.55 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.55 # Current number of processed clauses : 166
% 0.20/0.55 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 83
% 0.20/0.55 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.55 # Negative unit clauses : 6
% 0.20/0.55 # Non-unit-clauses : 77
% 0.20/0.55 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 108
% 0.20/0.55 # ...number of literals in the above : 258
% 0.20/0.55 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.55 # Current number of archived clauses : 59
% 0.20/0.55 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1037
% 0.20/0.55 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 920
% 0.20/0.55 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 29
% 0.20/0.55 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 179
% 0.20/0.55 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.55 # BW rewrite match attempts : 50
% 0.20/0.55 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.20/0.55 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.55 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.55 # Termbank termtop insertions : 13821
% 0.20/0.55
% 0.20/0.55 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.55 # User time : 0.013 s
% 0.20/0.55 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.55 # Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.20/0.55 # Maximum resident set size: 2640 pages
% 0.20/0.55
% 0.20/0.55 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.55 # User time : 0.027 s
% 0.20/0.55 # System time : 0.008 s
% 0.20/0.55 # Total time : 0.035 s
% 0.20/0.55 # Maximum resident set size: 2228 pages
% 0.20/0.55 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------