TSTP Solution File: SWB047+1 by E---3.2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.2.0
% Problem : SWB047+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 16:07:06 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 11.71s 1.98s
% Output : CNFRefutation 11.71s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 36 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 127 ( 12 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 20 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 142 ( 51 ~; 60 |; 23 &)
% ( 5 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 19 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 14 ( 14 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 61 ( 1 sgn 38 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(rdfs_cext_def,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X4,X5)
<=> icext(X5,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qNk7hJ0cPq/E---3.1_9040.p',rdfs_cext_def) ).
fof(owl_inv,axiom,
! [X33,X34] :
( iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X33,X34)
<=> ( ip(X33)
& ip(X34)
& ! [X4,X7] :
( iext(X33,X4,X7)
<=> iext(X34,X7,X4) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qNk7hJ0cPq/E---3.1_9040.p',owl_inv) ).
fof(owl_prop_inverseof_ext,axiom,
! [X4,X7] :
( iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X4,X7)
=> ( ip(X4)
& ip(X7) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qNk7hJ0cPq/E---3.1_9040.p',owl_prop_inverseof_ext) ).
fof(owl_char_functional,axiom,
! [X2] :
( icext(uri_owl_FunctionalProperty,X2)
<=> ( ip(X2)
& ! [X4,X27,X28] :
( ( iext(X2,X4,X27)
& iext(X2,X4,X28) )
=> X27 = X28 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qNk7hJ0cPq/E---3.1_9040.p',owl_char_functional) ).
fof(premise_rdfbased_sem_char_inversefunc_term,axiom,
( iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,uri_ex_p2,uri_ex_p1)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p1,uri_owl_FunctionalProperty) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qNk7hJ0cPq/E---3.1_9040.p',premise_rdfbased_sem_char_inversefunc_term) ).
fof(owl_char_inversefunctional,axiom,
! [X2] :
( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X2)
<=> ( ip(X2)
& ! [X37,X38,X7] :
( ( iext(X2,X37,X7)
& iext(X2,X38,X7) )
=> X37 = X38 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qNk7hJ0cPq/E---3.1_9040.p',owl_char_inversefunctional) ).
fof(conclusion_rdfbased_sem_char_inversefunc_term,conjecture,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p2,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qNk7hJ0cPq/E---3.1_9040.p',conclusion_rdfbased_sem_char_inversefunc_term) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X48,X49] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X48,X49)
| icext(X49,X48) )
& ( ~ icext(X49,X48)
| iext(uri_rdf_type,X48,X49) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdfs_cext_def])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X1014,X1015,X1016,X1017,X1018,X1019,X1020,X1021] :
( ( ip(X1014)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X1014,X1015) )
& ( ip(X1015)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X1014,X1015) )
& ( ~ iext(X1014,X1016,X1017)
| iext(X1015,X1017,X1016)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X1014,X1015) )
& ( ~ iext(X1015,X1019,X1018)
| iext(X1014,X1018,X1019)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X1014,X1015) )
& ( ~ iext(X1020,esk159_2(X1020,X1021),esk160_2(X1020,X1021))
| ~ iext(X1021,esk160_2(X1020,X1021),esk159_2(X1020,X1021))
| ~ ip(X1020)
| ~ ip(X1021)
| iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X1020,X1021) )
& ( iext(X1020,esk159_2(X1020,X1021),esk160_2(X1020,X1021))
| iext(X1021,esk160_2(X1020,X1021),esk159_2(X1020,X1021))
| ~ ip(X1020)
| ~ ip(X1021)
| iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X1020,X1021) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_inv])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X194,X195] :
( ( ip(X194)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X194,X195) )
& ( ip(X195)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X194,X195) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_prop_inverseof_ext])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X1030,X1031,X1032,X1033,X1034] :
( ( ip(X1030)
| ~ icext(uri_owl_FunctionalProperty,X1030) )
& ( ~ iext(X1030,X1031,X1032)
| ~ iext(X1030,X1031,X1033)
| X1032 = X1033
| ~ icext(uri_owl_FunctionalProperty,X1030) )
& ( iext(X1034,esk163_1(X1034),esk164_1(X1034))
| ~ ip(X1034)
| icext(uri_owl_FunctionalProperty,X1034) )
& ( iext(X1034,esk163_1(X1034),esk165_1(X1034))
| ~ ip(X1034)
| icext(uri_owl_FunctionalProperty,X1034) )
& ( esk164_1(X1034) != esk165_1(X1034)
| ~ ip(X1034)
| icext(uri_owl_FunctionalProperty,X1034) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_char_functional])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( icext(X2,X1)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p1,uri_owl_FunctionalProperty),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_char_inversefunc_term]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( iext(X4,X3,X2)
| ~ iext(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X1,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,uri_ex_p2,uri_ex_p1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_char_inversefunc_term]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X1038,X1039,X1040,X1041,X1042] :
( ( ip(X1038)
| ~ icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1038) )
& ( ~ iext(X1038,X1039,X1041)
| ~ iext(X1038,X1040,X1041)
| X1039 = X1040
| ~ icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1038) )
& ( iext(X1042,esk166_1(X1042),esk168_1(X1042))
| ~ ip(X1042)
| icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1042) )
& ( iext(X1042,esk167_1(X1042),esk168_1(X1042))
| ~ ip(X1042)
| icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1042) )
& ( esk166_1(X1042) != esk167_1(X1042)
| ~ ip(X1042)
| icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1042) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_char_inversefunctional])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ip(X1)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( X3 = X4
| ~ iext(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ iext(X1,X2,X4)
| ~ icext(uri_owl_FunctionalProperty,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
icext(uri_owl_FunctionalProperty,uri_ex_p1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( iext(uri_ex_p1,X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_ex_p2,X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( iext(X1,esk167_1(X1),esk168_1(X1))
| icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1)
| ~ ip(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
ip(uri_ex_p2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ iext(uri_ex_p1,X3,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_ex_p1,X3,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,uri_ex_p2)
| iext(uri_ex_p1,esk168_1(uri_ex_p2),esk167_1(uri_ex_p2)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( iext(X1,esk166_1(X1),esk168_1(X1))
| icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1)
| ~ ip(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
fof(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p2,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conclusion_rdfbased_sem_char_inversefunc_term])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( X1 = esk167_1(uri_ex_p2)
| icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,uri_ex_p2)
| ~ iext(uri_ex_p1,esk168_1(uri_ex_p2),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,uri_ex_p2)
| iext(uri_ex_p1,esk168_1(uri_ex_p2),esk166_1(uri_ex_p2)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_24]),c_0_21])]) ).
fof(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p2,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X2,X1)
| ~ icext(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( esk167_1(uri_ex_p2) = esk166_1(uri_ex_p2)
| icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,uri_ex_p2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p2,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1)
| esk166_1(X1) != esk167_1(X1)
| ~ ip(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
esk167_1(uri_ex_p2) = esk166_1(uri_ex_p2),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,uri_ex_p2),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_21])]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_34]),c_0_31]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWB047+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.35 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Jun 18 17:36:24 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.51 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.51 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qNk7hJ0cPq/E---3.1_9040.p
% 11.71/1.98 # Version: 3.2.0
% 11.71/1.98 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 11.71/1.98 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 11.71/1.98 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 11.71/1.98 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 11.71/1.98 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 11.71/1.98 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 11.71/1.98 # G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with pid 9119 completed with status 0
% 11.71/1.98 # Result found by G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI
% 11.71/1.98 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 11.71/1.98 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 11.71/1.98 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 11.71/1.98 # No SInE strategy applied
% 11.71/1.98 # Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 11.71/1.98 # partial match(1): FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 11.71/1.98 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 11.71/1.98 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 487s (1) cores
% 11.71/1.98 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 91s (1) cores
% 11.71/1.98 # Starting SAT001_CA_MinMin_p005000_rr with 82s (1) cores
% 11.71/1.98 # G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with pid 9133 completed with status 0
% 11.71/1.98 # Result found by G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI
% 11.71/1.98 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 11.71/1.98 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 11.71/1.98 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 11.71/1.98 # No SInE strategy applied
% 11.71/1.98 # Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 11.71/1.98 # partial match(1): FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 11.71/1.98 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 11.71/1.98 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 487s (1) cores
% 11.71/1.98 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 91s (1) cores
% 11.71/1.98 # Preprocessing time : 0.016 s
% 11.71/1.98
% 11.71/1.98 # Proof found!
% 11.71/1.98 # SZS status Theorem
% 11.71/1.98 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 11.71/1.98 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 11.71/1.98 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 11.71/1.98 # Initial clauses : 1269
% 11.71/1.98 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 111
% 11.71/1.98 # Initial clauses in saturation : 1158
% 11.71/1.98 # Processed clauses : 11223
% 11.71/1.98 # ...of these trivial : 1543
% 11.71/1.98 # ...subsumed : 4172
% 11.71/1.98 # ...remaining for further processing : 5508
% 11.71/1.98 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 16
% 11.71/1.98 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 11.71/1.98 # Backward-subsumed : 35
% 11.71/1.98 # Backward-rewritten : 12
% 11.71/1.98 # Generated clauses : 28901
% 11.71/1.98 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 22285
% 11.71/1.98 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 11.71/1.98 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 29
% 11.71/1.98 # Paramodulations : 28883
% 11.71/1.98 # Factorizations : 2
% 11.71/1.98 # NegExts : 0
% 11.71/1.98 # Equation resolutions : 16
% 11.71/1.98 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 11.71/1.98 # Total rewrite steps : 20925
% 11.71/1.98 # ...of those cached : 19565
% 11.71/1.98 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 11.71/1.98 # Propositional check models : 0
% 11.71/1.98 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 11.71/1.98 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 11.71/1.98 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 11.71/1.98 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 11.71/1.98 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 11.71/1.98 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 11.71/1.98 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 11.71/1.98 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 11.71/1.98 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 11.71/1.98 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 11.71/1.98 # Current number of processed clauses : 5445
% 11.71/1.98 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2222
% 11.71/1.98 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 11.71/1.98 # Negative unit clauses : 8
% 11.71/1.98 # Non-unit-clauses : 3215
% 11.71/1.98 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 12219
% 11.71/1.98 # ...number of literals in the above : 59383
% 11.71/1.98 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 11.71/1.98 # Current number of archived clauses : 48
% 11.71/1.98 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1634807
% 11.71/1.98 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 835853
% 11.71/1.98 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 4217
% 11.71/1.98 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 823033
% 11.71/1.98 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 11.71/1.98 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1494
% 11.71/1.98 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 11.71/1.98 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 11.71/1.98 # Condensation successes : 0
% 11.71/1.98 # Termbank termtop insertions : 486204
% 11.71/1.98 # Search garbage collected termcells : 19088
% 11.71/1.98
% 11.71/1.98 # -------------------------------------------------
% 11.71/1.98 # User time : 1.353 s
% 11.71/1.98 # System time : 0.032 s
% 11.71/1.98 # Total time : 1.385 s
% 11.71/1.98 # Maximum resident set size: 5768 pages
% 11.71/1.98
% 11.71/1.98 # -------------------------------------------------
% 11.71/1.98 # User time : 4.022 s
% 11.71/1.98 # System time : 0.138 s
% 11.71/1.98 # Total time : 4.159 s
% 11.71/1.98 # Maximum resident set size: 2228 pages
% 11.71/1.98 % E---3.1 exiting
% 11.71/1.98 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------