TSTP Solution File: SWB032+2 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWB032+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 19:20:44 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.21s 0.57s
% Output : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWB032+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 1 06:13:56 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.14/0.36 The process was started by sandbox on n026.cluster.edu,
% 0.14/0.36 Wed Jun 1 06:13:56 2022
% 0.14/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 15580.
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.14/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.14/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 formula_list(usable).
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.14/0.36 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.14/0.36 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.21/0.56
% 0.21/0.56 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.21/0.56
% 0.21/0.56
% 0.21/0.56 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.21/0.56
% 0.21/0.56
% 0.21/0.56
% 0.21/0.56 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.21/0.56
% 0.21/0.56 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.21/0.56 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.21/0.56 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.21/0.56 number of clauses in intial UL: 21
% 0.21/0.56 number of clauses initially in problem: 24
% 0.21/0.56 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 87
% 0.21/0.56 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.21/0.56 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.21/0.56 absolute distinct symbol count: 14
% 0.21/0.56 distinct predicate count: 4
% 0.21/0.56 distinct function count: 2
% 0.21/0.56 distinct constant count: 8
% 0.21/0.56
% 0.21/0.56 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.21/0.56
% 0.21/0.56
% 0.21/0.56
% 0.21/0.56 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.21/0.57
% 0.21/0.57 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.21/0.57 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.57 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.21/0.57
% 0.21/0.57 -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at 0.17 sec ----> 90 [hyper,87,17,84] {-} $F.
% 0.21/0.57
% 0.21/0.57 Length of proof is 12. Level of proof is 5.
% 0.21/0.57
% 0.21/0.57 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.21/0.57 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.57 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.21/0.57
% 0.21/0.57 1 [] {+} -icext(uri_rdf_PlainLiteral,A)| -icext(uri_owl_real,A).
% 0.21/0.57 2 [] {+} -icext(uri_xsd_string,A)|icext(uri_rdf_PlainLiteral,A).
% 0.21/0.57 3 [] {+} -icext(uri_owl_rational,A)|icext(uri_owl_real,A).
% 0.21/0.57 4 [] {+} -icext(uri_xsd_decimal,A)|icext(uri_owl_rational,A).
% 0.21/0.57 5 [] {+} -icext(uri_xsd_integer,A)|icext(uri_xsd_decimal,A).
% 0.21/0.57 6 [] {+} -idc(A)|ic(A).
% 0.21/0.57 10 [] {+} iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,A,B)| -ic(A)| -ic(B)|icext(A,$f1(A,B)).
% 0.21/0.57 11 [] {+} iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,A,B)| -ic(A)| -ic(B)| -icext(B,$f1(A,B)).
% 0.21/0.57 15 [] {+} iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,A,B)| -ic(A)| -ic(B)|icext(A,$f2(A,B)).
% 0.21/0.57 16 [] {+} iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,A,B)| -ic(A)| -ic(B)|icext(B,$f2(A,B)).
% 0.21/0.57 17 [] {+} -iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,uri_xsd_decimal,uri_xsd_string)| -iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_xsd_integer,uri_xsd_decimal).
% 0.21/0.57 22 [] {-} idc(uri_xsd_string).
% 0.21/0.57 23 [] {-} idc(uri_xsd_decimal).
% 0.21/0.57 24 [] {-} idc(uri_xsd_integer).
% 0.21/0.57 25 [hyper,22,6] {-} ic(uri_xsd_string).
% 0.21/0.57 26 [hyper,23,6] {-} ic(uri_xsd_decimal).
% 0.21/0.57 27 [hyper,24,6] {-} ic(uri_xsd_integer).
% 0.21/0.57 33 [hyper,26,16,25] {-} iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,uri_xsd_decimal,uri_xsd_string)|icext(uri_xsd_string,$f2(uri_xsd_decimal,uri_xsd_string)).
% 0.21/0.57 35 [hyper,26,15,25] {-} iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,uri_xsd_decimal,uri_xsd_string)|icext(uri_xsd_decimal,$f2(uri_xsd_decimal,uri_xsd_string)).
% 0.21/0.57 50 [hyper,27,10,26] {-} iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_xsd_integer,uri_xsd_decimal)|icext(uri_xsd_integer,$f1(uri_xsd_integer,uri_xsd_decimal)).
% 0.21/0.57 57 [hyper,33,2] {-} iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,uri_xsd_decimal,uri_xsd_string)|icext(uri_rdf_PlainLiteral,$f2(uri_xsd_decimal,uri_xsd_string)).
% 0.21/0.57 59 [hyper,35,4] {-} iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,uri_xsd_decimal,uri_xsd_string)|icext(uri_owl_rational,$f2(uri_xsd_decimal,uri_xsd_string)).
% 0.21/0.57 72 [hyper,50,5] {-} iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_xsd_integer,uri_xsd_decimal)|icext(uri_xsd_decimal,$f1(uri_xsd_integer,uri_xsd_decimal)).
% 0.21/0.57 76 [hyper,59,3] {-} iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,uri_xsd_decimal,uri_xsd_string)|icext(uri_owl_real,$f2(uri_xsd_decimal,uri_xsd_string)).
% 0.21/0.57 84 [hyper,72,11,27,26,factor_simp] {-} iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_xsd_integer,uri_xsd_decimal).
% 0.21/0.57 87 [hyper,76,1,57,factor_simp] {-} iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,uri_xsd_decimal,uri_xsd_string).
% 0.21/0.57 90 [hyper,87,17,84] {-} $F.
% 0.21/0.57
% 0.21/0.57 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.21/0.57 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.21/0.57
% 0.21/0.57
% 0.21/0.57 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.21/0.57
% 0.21/0.57
% 0.21/0.57 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.21/0.57
% 0.21/0.57 ============ end of search ============
% 0.21/0.57
% 0.21/0.57 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.21/0.57
% 0.21/0.57 Process 15580 finished Wed Jun 1 06:13:56 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------