TSTP Solution File: SWB032+2 by CSE---1.6

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.6
% Problem  : SWB032+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 20:01:27 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.84s 0.95s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.84s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13  % Problem    : SWB032+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Sun Aug 27 07:05:18 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.58  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.84/0.94  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.84/0.94  % File        :CSE---1.6
% 0.84/0.94  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.84/0.94  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.84/0.94  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.84/0.94  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.84/0.94  
% 0.84/0.94  % Result      :Theorem 0.310000s
% 0.84/0.94  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.310000s
% 0.84/0.94  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.84/0.95  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.84/0.95  % File     : SWB032+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.84/0.95  % Domain   : Semantic Web
% 0.84/0.95  % Problem  : Datatype Relationships
% 0.84/0.95  % Version  : [Sch11] axioms : Reduced > Incomplete.
% 0.84/0.95  % English  :
% 0.84/0.95  
% 0.84/0.95  % Refs     : [Sch11] Schneider, M. (2011), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.84/0.95  % Source   : [Sch11]
% 0.84/0.95  % Names    : 032_Datatype_Relationships [Sch11]
% 0.84/0.95  
% 0.84/0.95  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.84/0.95  % Rating   : 0.00 v6.3.0, 0.08 v6.2.0, 0.00 v5.5.0, 0.04 v5.4.0, 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.09 v5.2.0
% 0.84/0.95  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   12 (   3 unt;   0 def)
% 0.84/0.95  %            Number of atoms       :   27 (   0 equ)
% 0.84/0.95  %            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
% 0.84/0.95  %            Number of connectives :   17 (   2   ~;   0   |;   7   &)
% 0.84/0.95  %                                         (   2 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.84/0.95  %            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
% 0.84/0.95  %            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
% 0.84/0.95  %            Number of predicates  :    4 (   4 usr;   0 prp; 1-3 aty)
% 0.84/0.95  %            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   8 con; 0-0 aty)
% 0.84/0.95  %            Number of variables   :   12 (  12   !;   0   ?)
% 0.84/0.95  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.84/0.95  
% 0.84/0.95  % Comments :
% 0.84/0.95  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.84/0.95  fof(owl_dat_dtype_string_type,axiom,
% 0.84/0.95      idc(uri_xsd_string) ).
% 0.84/0.95  
% 0.84/0.95  fof(owl_dat_dtype_decimal_type,axiom,
% 0.84/0.95      idc(uri_xsd_decimal) ).
% 0.84/0.95  
% 0.84/0.95  fof(owl_dat_dtype_integer_type,axiom,
% 0.84/0.95      idc(uri_xsd_integer) ).
% 0.84/0.95  
% 0.84/0.95  fof(owl_dat_dtype_relation_disjoint_plainliteral_real,axiom,
% 0.84/0.95      ! [X] :
% 0.84/0.95        ~ ( icext(uri_rdf_PlainLiteral,X)
% 0.84/0.95          & icext(uri_owl_real,X) ) ).
% 0.84/0.95  
% 0.84/0.95  fof(owl_dat_dtype_relation_subtype_string_plainliteral,axiom,
% 0.84/0.95      ! [X] :
% 0.84/0.95        ( icext(uri_xsd_string,X)
% 0.84/0.95       => icext(uri_rdf_PlainLiteral,X) ) ).
% 0.84/0.95  
% 0.84/0.95  fof(owl_dat_dtype_relation_subtype_rational_real,axiom,
% 0.84/0.95      ! [X] :
% 0.84/0.95        ( icext(uri_owl_rational,X)
% 0.84/0.95       => icext(uri_owl_real,X) ) ).
% 0.84/0.95  
% 0.84/0.95  fof(owl_dat_dtype_relation_subtype_decimal_rational,axiom,
% 0.84/0.95      ! [X] :
% 0.84/0.95        ( icext(uri_xsd_decimal,X)
% 0.84/0.95       => icext(uri_owl_rational,X) ) ).
% 0.84/0.95  
% 0.84/0.95  fof(owl_dat_dtype_relation_subtype_integer_decimal,axiom,
% 0.84/0.95      ! [X] :
% 0.84/0.95        ( icext(uri_xsd_integer,X)
% 0.84/0.95       => icext(uri_xsd_decimal,X) ) ).
% 0.84/0.95  
% 0.84/0.95  fof(owl_parts_idc_cond_set,axiom,
% 0.84/0.95      ! [X] :
% 0.84/0.95        ( idc(X)
% 0.84/0.95       => ic(X) ) ).
% 0.84/0.95  
% 0.84/0.95  fof(owl_rdfsext_subclassof,axiom,
% 0.84/0.95      ! [C1,C2] :
% 0.84/0.95        ( iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,C1,C2)
% 0.84/0.95      <=> ( ic(C1)
% 0.84/0.95          & ic(C2)
% 0.84/0.95          & ! [X] :
% 0.84/0.95              ( icext(C1,X)
% 0.84/0.95             => icext(C2,X) ) ) ) ).
% 0.84/0.95  
% 0.84/0.95  fof(owl_eqdis_disjointwith,axiom,
% 0.84/0.95      ! [C1,C2] :
% 0.84/0.95        ( iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,C1,C2)
% 0.84/0.95      <=> ( ic(C1)
% 0.84/0.95          & ic(C2)
% 0.84/0.95          & ! [X] :
% 0.84/0.95              ~ ( icext(C1,X)
% 0.84/0.95                & icext(C2,X) ) ) ) ).
% 0.84/0.95  
% 0.84/0.95  fof(testcase_conclusion_fullish_032_Datatype_Relationships,conjecture,
% 0.84/0.95      ( iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,uri_xsd_decimal,uri_xsd_string)
% 0.84/0.95      & iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_xsd_integer,uri_xsd_decimal) ) ).
% 0.84/0.95  
% 0.84/0.95  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.84/0.95  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.84/0.95  % Proof found
% 0.84/0.95  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.84/0.95  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.84/0.95  %ClaNum:20(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.84/0.95  %VarNum:64(SingletonVarNum:28)
% 0.84/0.95  %MaxLitNum:4
% 0.84/0.95  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.84/0.95  %SharedTerms:13
% 0.84/0.95  %goalClause: 20
% 0.84/0.95  [1]P1(a1)
% 0.84/0.95  [2]P1(a2)
% 0.84/0.95  [3]P1(a10)
% 0.84/0.95  [20]~P4(a9,a10,a2)+~P4(a6,a2,a1)
% 0.84/0.95  [4]~P1(x41)+P2(x41)
% 0.84/0.95  [5]~P3(a10,x51)+P3(a2,x51)
% 0.84/0.95  [6]~P3(a1,x61)+P3(a3,x61)
% 0.84/0.95  [7]~P3(a5,x71)+P3(a4,x71)
% 0.84/0.95  [8]~P3(a2,x81)+P3(a5,x81)
% 0.84/0.95  [9]~P3(a4,x91)+~P3(a3,x91)
% 0.84/0.95  [10]P2(x101)+~P4(a9,x102,x101)
% 0.84/0.95  [11]P2(x111)+~P4(a9,x111,x112)
% 0.84/0.95  [12]P2(x121)+~P4(a6,x122,x121)
% 0.84/0.95  [13]P2(x131)+~P4(a6,x131,x132)
% 0.84/0.95  [17]P3(x171,x172)+~P3(x173,x172)+~P4(a9,x173,x171)
% 0.84/0.95  [18]~P3(x181,x182)+~P3(x183,x182)+~P4(a6,x183,x181)
% 0.84/0.95  [14]~P2(x142)+~P2(x141)+P4(a9,x141,x142)+P3(x141,f7(x141,x142))
% 0.84/0.95  [15]~P2(x151)+~P2(x152)+P4(a6,x151,x152)+P3(x152,f8(x151,x152))
% 0.84/0.95  [16]~P2(x162)+~P2(x161)+P4(a6,x161,x162)+P3(x161,f8(x161,x162))
% 0.84/0.95  [19]~P2(x191)+~P2(x192)+P4(a9,x191,x192)+~P3(x192,f7(x191,x192))
% 0.84/0.95  %EqnAxiom
% 0.84/0.95  
% 0.84/0.95  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.84/0.95  cnf(21,plain,
% 0.84/0.95     (P2(a1)),
% 0.84/0.95     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4])).
% 0.84/0.95  cnf(23,plain,
% 0.84/0.95     (P4(a6,a1,a1)+P3(a1,f8(a1,a1))),
% 0.84/0.95     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4,19,16])).
% 0.84/0.95  cnf(26,plain,
% 0.84/0.95     (P3(a5,x261)+~P3(a10,x261)),
% 0.84/0.95     inference(scs_inference,[],[5,8])).
% 0.84/0.95  cnf(27,plain,
% 0.84/0.95     (~P3(a1,x271)+~P3(a4,x271)),
% 0.84/0.95     inference(scs_inference,[],[6,9])).
% 0.84/0.95  cnf(28,plain,
% 0.84/0.95     (P2(a2)),
% 0.84/0.95     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,4])).
% 0.84/0.95  cnf(30,plain,
% 0.84/0.95     (P4(a6,a2,a2)+P3(a2,f8(a2,a2))),
% 0.84/0.95     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,4,15])).
% 0.84/0.95  cnf(32,plain,
% 0.84/0.95     (~P3(a5,x321)+~P3(a1,x321)),
% 0.84/0.95     inference(scs_inference,[],[7,27])).
% 0.84/0.95  cnf(34,plain,
% 0.84/0.95     (P2(a10)),
% 0.84/0.95     inference(scs_inference,[],[3,4])).
% 0.84/0.95  cnf(37,plain,
% 0.84/0.95     (P4(a6,a10,a1)+P3(a5,f8(a10,a1))),
% 0.84/0.95     inference(scs_inference,[],[34,21,26,16])).
% 0.84/0.95  cnf(40,plain,
% 0.84/0.95     (P4(a6,a1,a1)+~P3(a5,f8(a1,a1))),
% 0.84/0.95     inference(scs_inference,[],[32,23])).
% 0.84/0.95  cnf(43,plain,
% 0.84/0.95     (~P3(a2,f7(a10,a2))+~P4(a6,a2,a1)),
% 0.84/0.95     inference(scs_inference,[],[34,28,20,19])).
% 0.84/0.95  cnf(46,plain,
% 0.84/0.95     (P4(a9,a2,a2)),
% 0.84/0.95     inference(scs_inference,[],[28,14,19])).
% 0.84/0.95  cnf(48,plain,
% 0.84/0.95     (~P3(a2,x481)+P3(a2,f8(a2,a2))),
% 0.84/0.95     inference(scs_inference,[],[30,18])).
% 0.84/0.95  cnf(53,plain,
% 0.84/0.96     (~P4(a6,a2,a2)+~P3(a2,x531)),
% 0.84/0.96     inference(scs_inference,[],[48,18])).
% 0.84/0.96  cnf(57,plain,
% 0.84/0.96     (P3(a4,f8(a10,a1))+P4(a6,a10,a1)),
% 0.84/0.96     inference(scs_inference,[],[37,7])).
% 0.84/0.96  cnf(58,plain,
% 0.84/0.96     (~P3(a1,x581)+~P3(a5,f8(a1,a1))),
% 0.84/0.96     inference(scs_inference,[],[40,18])).
% 0.84/0.96  cnf(59,plain,
% 0.84/0.96     (~P3(a1,x591)+~P3(a2,f8(a1,a1))),
% 0.84/0.96     inference(scs_inference,[],[58,8])).
% 0.84/0.96  cnf(60,plain,
% 0.84/0.96     (P4(a6,a1,a1)+~P3(a2,f8(a1,a1))),
% 0.84/0.96     inference(scs_inference,[],[59,23])).
% 0.84/0.96  cnf(61,plain,
% 0.84/0.96     (~P3(a10,f7(a10,a2))+~P4(a6,a2,a1)),
% 0.84/0.96     inference(scs_inference,[],[43,5])).
% 0.84/0.96  cnf(63,plain,
% 0.84/0.96     (~P3(a3,f8(a10,a1))+P4(a6,a10,a1)),
% 0.84/0.96     inference(scs_inference,[],[57,9])).
% 0.84/0.96  cnf(65,plain,
% 0.84/0.96     (P4(a9,a10,a2)+~P4(a6,a2,a1)),
% 0.84/0.96     inference(scs_inference,[],[34,28,61,14])).
% 0.84/0.96  cnf(66,plain,
% 0.84/0.96     (P3(a1,f8(a2,a1))+P4(a9,a10,a2)),
% 0.84/0.96     inference(scs_inference,[],[28,21,65,15])).
% 0.84/0.96  cnf(67,plain,
% 0.84/0.96     (~P3(a1,f8(a10,a1))+P4(a6,a10,a1)),
% 0.84/0.96     inference(scs_inference,[],[63,6])).
% 0.84/0.96  cnf(68,plain,
% 0.84/0.96     (~P4(a6,a1,a1)+P4(a9,a10,a2)),
% 0.84/0.96     inference(scs_inference,[],[66,18])).
% 0.84/0.96  cnf(71,plain,
% 0.84/0.96     (P4(a6,a10,a1)),
% 0.84/0.96     inference(scs_inference,[],[34,21,67,15])).
% 0.84/0.96  cnf(77,plain,
% 0.84/0.96     (~P3(a1,x771)+~P3(a10,x771)),
% 0.84/0.96     inference(scs_inference,[],[71,18])).
% 0.84/0.96  cnf(92,plain,
% 0.84/0.96     (~P3(a2,f7(a1,a2))+P4(a9,a1,a2)),
% 0.84/0.96     inference(scs_inference,[],[46,21,28,17,19])).
% 0.84/0.96  cnf(93,plain,
% 0.84/0.96     (~P3(a10,f7(a1,a2))+P4(a9,a1,a2)),
% 0.84/0.96     inference(scs_inference,[],[92,5])).
% 0.84/0.96  cnf(94,plain,
% 0.84/0.96     (P3(a2,x941)+~P3(a1,x941)+~P3(a10,f7(a1,a2))),
% 0.84/0.96     inference(scs_inference,[],[93,17])).
% 0.84/0.96  cnf(97,plain,
% 0.84/0.96     (P4(a6,a1,a1)+~P3(a10,f7(a1,a2))+P3(a2,f8(a1,a1))),
% 0.84/0.96     inference(scs_inference,[],[94,23])).
% 0.84/0.96  cnf(99,plain,
% 0.84/0.96     (~P3(a10,f7(a1,a2))+P3(a2,f8(a1,a1))+P4(a9,a10,a2)),
% 0.84/0.96     inference(scs_inference,[],[97,68])).
% 0.84/0.96  cnf(101,plain,
% 0.84/0.96     (~P3(a10,f7(a1,a2))+~P3(a1,x1011)+P4(a9,a10,a2)),
% 0.84/0.96     inference(scs_inference,[],[99,59])).
% 0.84/0.96  cnf(102,plain,
% 0.84/0.96     (~P3(a10,f7(a1,a2))+P4(a9,a10,a2)),
% 0.84/0.96     inference(scs_inference,[],[101,66])).
% 0.84/0.96  cnf(105,plain,
% 0.84/0.96     (~P3(a10,f7(a1,a2))+~P4(a6,a2,a1)),
% 0.84/0.96     inference(scs_inference,[],[102,20])).
% 0.84/0.96  cnf(106,plain,
% 0.84/0.96     (~P3(a10,f7(a1,a2))+P3(a1,f8(a2,a1))),
% 0.84/0.96     inference(scs_inference,[],[28,21,105,15])).
% 0.84/0.96  cnf(107,plain,
% 0.84/0.96     (~P3(a10,f7(a1,a2))+P3(a3,f8(a2,a1))),
% 0.84/0.96     inference(scs_inference,[],[106,6])).
% 0.84/0.96  cnf(108,plain,
% 0.84/0.96     (~P3(a10,f7(a1,a2))+~P3(a4,f8(a2,a1))),
% 0.84/0.96     inference(scs_inference,[],[107,9])).
% 0.84/0.96  cnf(109,plain,
% 0.84/0.96     (~P3(a10,f7(a1,a2))+~P3(a5,f8(a2,a1))),
% 0.84/0.96     inference(scs_inference,[],[108,7])).
% 0.84/0.96  cnf(110,plain,
% 0.84/0.96     (~P3(a10,f7(a1,a2))+~P3(a2,f8(a2,a1))),
% 0.84/0.96     inference(scs_inference,[],[109,8])).
% 0.84/0.96  cnf(127,plain,
% 0.84/0.96     (~P3(a10,f8(a1,a1))+~P3(a1,x1271)),
% 0.84/0.96     inference(scs_inference,[],[5,59])).
% 0.84/0.96  cnf(136,plain,
% 0.84/0.96     (P4(a9,a10,a2)+~P3(a10,f7(a10,a2))),
% 0.84/0.96     inference(scs_inference,[],[34,28,5,19])).
% 0.84/0.96  cnf(137,plain,
% 0.84/0.96     (P4(a9,a10,a2)),
% 0.84/0.96     inference(scs_inference,[],[28,34,136,14])).
% 0.84/0.96  cnf(138,plain,
% 0.84/0.96     (~P4(a6,a2,a1)),
% 0.84/0.96     inference(scs_inference,[],[137,20])).
% 0.84/0.96  cnf(164,plain,
% 0.84/0.96     ($false),
% 0.84/0.96     inference(scs_inference,[],[138,21,28,15,127,32,6,18,16,17,110,77,60,58,53,27,23,8]),
% 0.84/0.96     ['proof']).
% 0.84/0.96  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.84/0.96  % Total time :0.310000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------