TSTP Solution File: SWB029+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWB029+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 19:02:06 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.53s 47.71s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.53s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 30 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 175 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 71 ( 5 avg)
% Number of connectives : 246 ( 101 ~; 102 |; 37 &)
% ( 4 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 26 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 15 ( 15 usr; 14 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 62 ( 7 sgn 26 !; 4 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(owl_bool_intersectionof_class_002,axiom,
! [X11,X12,X13,X14,X15] :
( ( iext(uri_rdf_first,X12,X13)
& iext(uri_rdf_rest,X12,X14)
& iext(uri_rdf_first,X14,X15)
& iext(uri_rdf_rest,X14,uri_rdf_nil) )
=> ( iext(uri_owl_intersectionOf,X11,X12)
<=> ( ic(X11)
& ic(X13)
& ic(X15)
& ! [X4] :
( icext(X11,X4)
<=> ( icext(X13,X4)
& icext(X15,X4) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_bool_intersectionof_class_002) ).
fof(testcase_premise_fullish_029_Ex_Falso_Quodlibet,axiom,
? [X42,X43,X44,X45] :
( iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_A,uri_owl_Class)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_B,uri_owl_Class)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,X42)
& iext(uri_owl_intersectionOf,X42,X44)
& iext(uri_rdf_first,X44,uri_ex_A)
& iext(uri_rdf_rest,X44,X45)
& iext(uri_rdf_first,X45,X43)
& iext(uri_rdf_rest,X45,uri_rdf_nil)
& iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X43,uri_ex_A) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',testcase_premise_fullish_029_Ex_Falso_Quodlibet) ).
fof(rdfs_cext_def,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X4,X5)
<=> icext(X5,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',rdfs_cext_def) ).
fof(owl_bool_complementof_class,axiom,
! [X11,X5] :
( iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X11,X5)
=> ( ic(X11)
& ic(X5)
& ! [X4] :
( icext(X11,X4)
<=> ~ icext(X5,X4) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_bool_complementof_class) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X16,X17,X18,X19,X20,X21,X21] :
( ( ic(X16)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_intersectionOf,X16,X17)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X17,X18)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X17,X19)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X19,X20)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X19,uri_rdf_nil) )
& ( ic(X18)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_intersectionOf,X16,X17)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X17,X18)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X17,X19)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X19,X20)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X19,uri_rdf_nil) )
& ( ic(X20)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_intersectionOf,X16,X17)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X17,X18)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X17,X19)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X19,X20)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X19,uri_rdf_nil) )
& ( icext(X18,X21)
| ~ icext(X16,X21)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_intersectionOf,X16,X17)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X17,X18)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X17,X19)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X19,X20)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X19,uri_rdf_nil) )
& ( icext(X20,X21)
| ~ icext(X16,X21)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_intersectionOf,X16,X17)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X17,X18)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X17,X19)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X19,X20)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X19,uri_rdf_nil) )
& ( ~ icext(X18,X21)
| ~ icext(X20,X21)
| icext(X16,X21)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_intersectionOf,X16,X17)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X17,X18)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X17,X19)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X19,X20)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X19,uri_rdf_nil) )
& ( ~ icext(X16,esk12_5(X16,X17,X18,X19,X20))
| ~ icext(X18,esk12_5(X16,X17,X18,X19,X20))
| ~ icext(X20,esk12_5(X16,X17,X18,X19,X20))
| ~ ic(X16)
| ~ ic(X18)
| ~ ic(X20)
| iext(uri_owl_intersectionOf,X16,X17)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X17,X18)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X17,X19)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X19,X20)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X19,uri_rdf_nil) )
& ( icext(X18,esk12_5(X16,X17,X18,X19,X20))
| icext(X16,esk12_5(X16,X17,X18,X19,X20))
| ~ ic(X16)
| ~ ic(X18)
| ~ ic(X20)
| iext(uri_owl_intersectionOf,X16,X17)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X17,X18)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X17,X19)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X19,X20)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X19,uri_rdf_nil) )
& ( icext(X20,esk12_5(X16,X17,X18,X19,X20))
| icext(X16,esk12_5(X16,X17,X18,X19,X20))
| ~ ic(X16)
| ~ ic(X18)
| ~ ic(X20)
| iext(uri_owl_intersectionOf,X16,X17)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X17,X18)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X17,X19)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X19,X20)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X19,uri_rdf_nil) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_bool_intersectionof_class_002])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
( iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_A,uri_owl_Class)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_B,uri_owl_Class)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,esk1_0)
& iext(uri_owl_intersectionOf,esk1_0,esk3_0)
& iext(uri_rdf_first,esk3_0,uri_ex_A)
& iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk3_0,esk4_0)
& iext(uri_rdf_first,esk4_0,esk2_0)
& iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk4_0,uri_rdf_nil)
& iext(uri_owl_complementOf,esk2_0,uri_ex_A) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_029_Ex_Falso_Quodlibet])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( icext(X4,X6)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X1,uri_rdf_nil)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X3,X1)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X3,X4)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_intersectionOf,X5,X3)
| ~ icext(X5,X6) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_first,esk3_0,uri_ex_A),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( icext(X2,X6)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X1,uri_rdf_nil)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X3,X1)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X3,X4)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_intersectionOf,X5,X3)
| ~ icext(X5,X6) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( icext(uri_ex_A,X1)
| ~ icext(X2,X1)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X3,uri_rdf_nil)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk3_0,X3)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_intersectionOf,X2,esk3_0)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X3,X4) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_first,esk4_0,esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk4_0,uri_rdf_nil),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk3_0,esk4_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X6,X7,X6,X7] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X6,X7)
| icext(X7,X6) )
& ( ~ icext(X7,X6)
| iext(uri_rdf_type,X6,X7) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdfs_cext_def])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( icext(X1,X2)
| ~ icext(X3,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X4,uri_rdf_nil)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk3_0,X4)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_intersectionOf,X3,esk3_0)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X4,X1) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X12,X13,X14,X14] :
( ( ic(X12)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X12,X13) )
& ( ic(X13)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X12,X13) )
& ( ~ icext(X12,X14)
| ~ icext(X13,X14)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X12,X13) )
& ( icext(X13,X14)
| icext(X12,X14)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X12,X13) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[owl_bool_complementof_class])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( icext(uri_ex_A,X1)
| ~ icext(X2,X1)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_intersectionOf,X2,esk3_0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),c_0_12])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
iext(uri_owl_intersectionOf,esk1_0,esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( icext(X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( icext(esk2_0,X1)
| ~ icext(X2,X1)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_intersectionOf,X2,esk3_0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),c_0_12])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X1,X2)
| ~ icext(X2,X3)
| ~ icext(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
iext(uri_owl_complementOf,esk2_0,uri_ex_A),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( icext(uri_ex_A,X1)
| ~ icext(esk1_0,X1) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
icext(esk1_0,uri_ex_w),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( icext(esk2_0,X1)
| ~ icext(esk1_0,X1) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( ~ icext(uri_ex_A,X1)
| ~ icext(esk2_0,X1) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
icext(uri_ex_A,uri_ex_w),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
icext(esk2_0,uri_ex_w),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWB029+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 1 06:23:15 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.39/23.45 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.39/23.45 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.39/23.49 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.39/23.55 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.52/46.49 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.52/46.51 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.52/46.52 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.52/46.62 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.53/47.71 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.53/47.71 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.53/47.71 # Preprocessing time : 0.028 s
% 0.53/47.71
% 0.53/47.71 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.53/47.71 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.53/47.71 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.53/47.71 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 526
% 0.53/47.71 # Initial clauses : 50
% 0.53/47.71 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 12
% 0.53/47.71 # Initial clauses in saturation : 38
% 0.53/47.71 # Processed clauses : 265
% 0.53/47.71 # ...of these trivial : 15
% 0.53/47.71 # ...subsumed : 98
% 0.53/47.71 # ...remaining for further processing : 152
% 0.53/47.71 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Generated clauses : 374
% 0.53/47.71 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 227
% 0.53/47.71 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 24
% 0.53/47.71 # Paramodulations : 374
% 0.53/47.71 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Current number of processed clauses : 152
% 0.53/47.71 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 38
% 0.53/47.71 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.53/47.71 # Non-unit-clauses : 113
% 0.53/47.71 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.53/47.71 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.53/47.71 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6047
% 0.53/47.71 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2101
% 0.53/47.71 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 122
% 0.53/47.71 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8
% 0.53/47.71 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # BW rewrite match attempts : 6
% 0.53/47.71 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Termbank termtop insertions : 14207
% 0.53/47.71
% 0.53/47.71 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.53/47.71 # User time : 0.041 s
% 0.53/47.71 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.53/47.71 # Total time : 0.044 s
% 0.53/47.71 # Maximum resident set size: 4228 pages
% 0.53/47.71 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.53/47.71
% 0.53/47.71 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.53/47.71 # OLD status Res
% 0.53/47.71 # Preprocessing time : 0.092 s
% 0.53/47.71 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_eb48853eb71ccd2a6fdade56c25b63f5692e1a0c for 23 seconds:
% 0.53/47.71
% 0.53/47.71 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.53/47.71 # OLD status Res
% 0.53/47.71 # Preprocessing time : 0.046 s
% 0.53/47.71 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_761a0d093d9701c0eed884aebb46468e8d439c31 for 23 seconds:
% 0.53/47.71 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.2,,,100,1.0)
% 0.53/47.71 # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 0.53/47.71
% 0.53/47.71 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.53/47.71 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.53/47.71 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.53/47.71 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 529
% 0.53/47.71 # Initial clauses : 47
% 0.53/47.71 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 12
% 0.53/47.71 # Initial clauses in saturation : 35
% 0.53/47.71 # Processed clauses : 212
% 0.53/47.71 # ...of these trivial : 12
% 0.53/47.71 # ...subsumed : 77
% 0.53/47.71 # ...remaining for further processing : 123
% 0.53/47.71 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Generated clauses : 327
% 0.53/47.71 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 177
% 0.53/47.71 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 24
% 0.53/47.71 # Paramodulations : 327
% 0.53/47.71 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Current number of processed clauses : 123
% 0.53/47.71 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 36
% 0.53/47.71 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.53/47.71 # Non-unit-clauses : 86
% 0.53/47.71 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.53/47.71 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.53/47.71 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1678
% 0.53/47.71 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 659
% 0.53/47.71 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 101
% 0.53/47.71 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13
% 0.53/47.71 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # BW rewrite match attempts : 5
% 0.53/47.71 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Termbank termtop insertions : 13123
% 0.53/47.71
% 0.53/47.71 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.53/47.71 # User time : 0.017 s
% 0.53/47.71 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.53/47.71 # Total time : 0.021 s
% 0.53/47.71 # Maximum resident set size: 4216 pages
% 0.53/47.71 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_bb5e3cecdbc7660bd3a6f864cadb7769d8aea26a for 23 seconds:
% 0.53/47.71 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.1,,,500,1.0)
% 0.53/47.71 # Preprocessing time : 0.014 s
% 0.53/47.71
% 0.53/47.71 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.53/47.71 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.53/47.71 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.53/47.71 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 558
% 0.53/47.71 # Initial clauses : 3
% 0.53/47.71 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 0.53/47.71 # Processed clauses : 3
% 0.53/47.71 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # ...remaining for further processing : 3
% 0.53/47.71 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Current number of processed clauses : 3
% 0.53/47.71 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.53/47.71 # Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.53/47.71 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.53/47.71 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Termbank termtop insertions : 7141
% 0.53/47.71
% 0.53/47.71 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.53/47.71 # User time : 0.012 s
% 0.53/47.71 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.53/47.71 # Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.53/47.71 # Maximum resident set size: 3600 pages
% 0.53/47.71 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_e252f7803940d118fa0ef69fc2319cb55aee23b9 for 23 seconds:
% 0.53/47.71 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,1.4,,03,100,1.0)
% 0.53/47.71 # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 0.53/47.71
% 0.53/47.71 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.53/47.71 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.53/47.71 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.53/47.71 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 536
% 0.53/47.71 # Initial clauses : 37
% 0.53/47.71 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 12
% 0.53/47.71 # Initial clauses in saturation : 25
% 0.53/47.71 # Processed clauses : 203
% 0.53/47.71 # ...of these trivial : 14
% 0.53/47.71 # ...subsumed : 52
% 0.53/47.71 # ...remaining for further processing : 137
% 0.53/47.71 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Backward-subsumed : 4
% 0.53/47.71 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Generated clauses : 291
% 0.53/47.71 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 178
% 0.53/47.71 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Paramodulations : 291
% 0.53/47.71 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Current number of processed clauses : 133
% 0.53/47.71 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 31
% 0.53/47.71 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.53/47.71 # Non-unit-clauses : 101
% 0.53/47.71 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.53/47.71 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Current number of archived clauses : 5
% 0.53/47.71 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 868
% 0.53/47.71 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 353
% 0.53/47.71 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 56
% 0.53/47.71 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 32
% 0.53/47.71 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.53/47.71 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Termbank termtop insertions : 13429
% 0.53/47.71
% 0.53/47.71 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.53/47.71 # User time : 0.017 s
% 0.53/47.71 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.53/47.71 # Total time : 0.019 s
% 0.53/47.71 # Maximum resident set size: 4476 pages
% 0.53/47.71 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_b1d72019af42f5b571a6c0b233a5b6d1de064075 for 23 seconds:
% 0.53/47.71 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,02,500,1.0)
% 0.53/47.71 # Preprocessing time : 0.014 s
% 0.53/47.71
% 0.53/47.71 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.53/47.71 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.53/47.71 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.53/47.71 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 540
% 0.53/47.71 # Initial clauses : 29
% 0.53/47.71 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 12
% 0.53/47.71 # Initial clauses in saturation : 17
% 0.53/47.71 # Processed clauses : 45
% 0.53/47.71 # ...of these trivial : 3
% 0.53/47.71 # ...subsumed : 5
% 0.53/47.71 # ...remaining for further processing : 37
% 0.53/47.71 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Generated clauses : 37
% 0.53/47.71 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 28
% 0.53/47.71 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 3
% 0.53/47.71 # Paramodulations : 37
% 0.53/47.71 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Current number of processed clauses : 37
% 0.53/47.71 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 15
% 0.53/47.71 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.53/47.71 # Non-unit-clauses : 20
% 0.53/47.71 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.53/47.71 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.53/47.71 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 62
% 0.53/47.71 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 36
% 0.53/47.71 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 8
% 0.53/47.71 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.53/47.71 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.53/47.71 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.53/47.71 # Termbank termtop insertions : 8659
% 0.53/47.71
% 0.53/47.71 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.53/47.71 # User time : 0.013 s
% 0.53/47.71 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.53/47.71 # Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.53/47.71 # Maximum resident set size: 3660 pages
% 0.53/47.71 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_e96ef4641ae500918cdd95fcfce21e29f2ac5eec for 23 seconds:
% 0.53/47.71 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,6.0,,03,100,1.0)
% 0.53/47.71 # Preprocessing time : 0.020 s
% 0.53/47.71
% 0.53/47.71 # Proof found!
% 0.53/47.71 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.53/47.71 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.53/47.72 # Proof object total steps : 30
% 0.53/47.72 # Proof object clause steps : 22
% 0.53/47.72 # Proof object formula steps : 8
% 0.53/47.72 # Proof object conjectures : 0
% 0.53/47.72 # Proof object clause conjectures : 0
% 0.53/47.72 # Proof object formula conjectures : 0
% 0.53/47.72 # Proof object initial clauses used : 11
% 0.53/47.72 # Proof object initial formulas used : 4
% 0.53/47.72 # Proof object generating inferences : 11
% 0.53/47.72 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 8
% 0.53/47.72 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.53/47.72 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.53/47.72 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 459
% 0.53/47.72 # Initial clauses : 221
% 0.53/47.72 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 20
% 0.53/47.72 # Initial clauses in saturation : 201
% 0.53/47.72 # Processed clauses : 2683
% 0.53/47.72 # ...of these trivial : 78
% 0.53/47.72 # ...subsumed : 725
% 0.53/47.72 # ...remaining for further processing : 1880
% 0.53/47.72 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 10
% 0.53/47.72 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.53/47.72 # Backward-subsumed : 77
% 0.53/47.72 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.53/47.72 # Generated clauses : 4948
% 0.53/47.72 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 4290
% 0.53/47.72 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 767
% 0.53/47.72 # Paramodulations : 4938
% 0.53/47.72 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.53/47.72 # Equation resolutions : 10
% 0.53/47.72 # Current number of processed clauses : 1793
% 0.53/47.72 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 165
% 0.53/47.72 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.53/47.72 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.53/47.72 # Non-unit-clauses : 1626
% 0.53/47.72 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1772
% 0.53/47.72 # ...number of literals in the above : 10449
% 0.53/47.72 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.53/47.72 # Current number of archived clauses : 78
% 0.53/47.72 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 515663
% 0.53/47.72 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 217868
% 0.53/47.72 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1569
% 0.53/47.72 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11998
% 0.53/47.72 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.53/47.72 # BW rewrite match attempts : 34
% 0.53/47.72 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.53/47.72 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.53/47.72 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.53/47.72 # Termbank termtop insertions : 62808
% 0.53/47.72
% 0.53/47.72 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.53/47.72 # User time : 0.191 s
% 0.53/47.72 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.53/47.72 # Total time : 0.196 s
% 0.53/47.72 # Maximum resident set size: 8208 pages
% 0.53/69.52 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.53/69.53 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.53/69.53 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.53/69.53 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.53/69.54 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.53/69.54 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.53/69.54 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.53/69.54 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.53/69.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.53/69.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.53/69.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.53/69.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.53/69.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.53/69.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.53/69.56 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.53/69.56 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.53/69.56 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.53/69.56 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.53/69.56 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.53/69.56 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.53/69.56 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.53/69.56 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.53/69.57 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.53/69.57 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.53/69.57 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.53/69.57 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.53/69.57 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.53/69.57 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.53/69.58 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.53/69.58 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.53/69.59 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.53/69.59 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.53/69.59 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.53/69.59 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.53/69.70 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.53/69.72 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.53/69.72 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.53/69.72 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.53/69.72 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.53/69.73 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.53/69.73 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------