TSTP Solution File: SWB027+2 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SWB027+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 18:59:09 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.73s 2.34s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.73s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 15
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 41 ( 17 unt; 8 nHn; 41 RR)
% Number of literals : 96 ( 5 equ; 49 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 8 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 15 ( 15 usr; 12 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 59 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_8,plain,
( iext(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ iext(X4,X5,X3)
| ~ iext(X6,X2,X5)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X7,X4)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X8,X6)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X8,X7)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyChainAxiom,X1,X8)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X7,uri_rdf_nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9p6caeua/lgb.p',i_0_8) ).
cnf(i_0_29,plain,
iext(uri_owl_propertyChainAxiom,uri_owl_sameAs,esk9_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9p6caeua/lgb.p',i_0_29) ).
cnf(i_0_28,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_first,esk9_0,uri_ex_p),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9p6caeua/lgb.p',i_0_28) ).
cnf(i_0_26,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_first,esk10_0,esk11_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9p6caeua/lgb.p',i_0_26) ).
cnf(i_0_25,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk10_0,uri_rdf_nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9p6caeua/lgb.p',i_0_25) ).
cnf(i_0_27,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk9_0,esk10_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9p6caeua/lgb.p',i_0_27) ).
cnf(i_0_21,plain,
( ip(X1)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9p6caeua/lgb.p',i_0_21) ).
cnf(i_0_24,plain,
iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,esk11_0,uri_ex_p),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9p6caeua/lgb.p',i_0_24) ).
cnf(i_0_19,plain,
( iext(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ iext(X4,X3,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X1,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9p6caeua/lgb.p',i_0_19) ).
cnf(i_0_13,plain,
( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1)
| iext(X1,esk5_1(X1),esk6_1(X1))
| ~ ip(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9p6caeua/lgb.p',i_0_13) ).
cnf(i_0_14,plain,
( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1)
| iext(X1,esk4_1(X1),esk6_1(X1))
| ~ ip(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9p6caeua/lgb.p',i_0_14) ).
cnf(i_0_4,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9p6caeua/lgb.p',i_0_4) ).
cnf(i_0_12,plain,
( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1)
| esk4_1(X1) != esk5_1(X1)
| ~ ip(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9p6caeua/lgb.p',i_0_12) ).
cnf(i_0_1,plain,
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,X2)
| ~ icext(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9p6caeua/lgb.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(i_0_23,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9p6caeua/lgb.p',i_0_23) ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
( iext(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ iext(X4,X5,X3)
| ~ iext(X6,X2,X5)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X7,X4)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X8,X6)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X8,X7)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyChainAxiom,X1,X8)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X7,uri_rdf_nil) ),
i_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_46,plain,
iext(uri_owl_propertyChainAxiom,uri_owl_sameAs,esk9_0),
i_0_29 ).
cnf(c_0_47,plain,
( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X3,uri_rdf_nil)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk9_0,X3)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,esk9_0,X4)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X3,X5)
| ~ iext(X4,X1,X6)
| ~ iext(X5,X6,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_46]) ).
cnf(c_0_48,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_first,esk9_0,uri_ex_p),
i_0_28 ).
cnf(c_0_49,plain,
( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X3,uri_rdf_nil)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk9_0,X3)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X3,X4)
| ~ iext(uri_ex_p,X1,X5)
| ~ iext(X4,X5,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48]) ).
cnf(c_0_50,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_first,esk10_0,esk11_0),
i_0_26 ).
cnf(c_0_51,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk10_0,uri_rdf_nil),
i_0_25 ).
cnf(c_0_52,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk9_0,esk10_0),
i_0_27 ).
cnf(c_0_53,plain,
( ip(X1)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X2,X1) ),
i_0_21 ).
cnf(c_0_54,plain,
iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,esk11_0,uri_ex_p),
i_0_24 ).
cnf(c_0_55,plain,
( iext(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ iext(X4,X3,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X1,X4) ),
i_0_19 ).
cnf(c_0_56,plain,
( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_ex_p,X1,X3)
| ~ iext(esk11_0,X3,X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_50]),c_0_51]),c_0_52])]) ).
cnf(c_0_57,plain,
( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1)
| iext(X1,esk5_1(X1),esk6_1(X1))
| ~ ip(X1) ),
i_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_58,plain,
ip(uri_ex_p),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_54]) ).
cnf(c_0_59,plain,
( iext(esk11_0,X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_ex_p,X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_54]) ).
cnf(c_0_60,plain,
( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1)
| iext(X1,esk4_1(X1),esk6_1(X1))
| ~ ip(X1) ),
i_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_61,plain,
( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,uri_ex_p)
| iext(uri_owl_sameAs,esk5_1(uri_ex_p),X1)
| ~ iext(esk11_0,esk6_1(uri_ex_p),X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_57]),c_0_58])]) ).
cnf(c_0_62,plain,
( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,uri_ex_p)
| iext(esk11_0,esk6_1(uri_ex_p),esk4_1(uri_ex_p)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_59,c_0_60]),c_0_58])]) ).
cnf(c_0_63,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X2) ),
i_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_64,plain,
( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,uri_ex_p)
| iext(uri_owl_sameAs,esk5_1(uri_ex_p),esk4_1(uri_ex_p)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_61,c_0_62]) ).
cnf(c_0_65,plain,
( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1)
| esk4_1(X1) != esk5_1(X1)
| ~ ip(X1) ),
i_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_66,plain,
( esk5_1(uri_ex_p) = esk4_1(uri_ex_p)
| icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,uri_ex_p) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_63,c_0_64]) ).
cnf(c_0_67,plain,
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,X2)
| ~ icext(X2,X1) ),
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_68,plain,
icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,uri_ex_p),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_65,c_0_66]),c_0_58])]) ).
cnf(c_0_69,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty),
i_0_23 ).
cnf(c_0_70,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_67,c_0_68]),c_0_69]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWB027+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jun 1 13:55:43 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.73/2.34 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.73/2.34 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.73/2.34 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.73/2.34 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___205_C45_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y
% 7.73/2.34 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 7.73/2.34 #
% 7.73/2.34 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 7.73/2.34
% 7.73/2.34 # Proof found!
% 7.73/2.34 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.73/2.34 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.73/2.34 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.73/2.34
% 7.73/2.34 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.73/2.34 # User time : 0.029 s
% 7.73/2.34 # System time : 0.005 s
% 7.73/2.34 # Total time : 0.035 s
% 7.73/2.34 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 7.73/2.34
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------