TSTP Solution File: SWB019+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SWB019+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 18:58:43 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 9.52s 2.67s
% Output : CNFRefutation 9.52s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 36 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 15 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 42 ( 15 ~; 13 |; 13 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 15 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 9 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 0 sgn 10 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(owl_eqdis_propertydisjointwith,axiom,
! [X33,X34] :
( iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X33,X34)
<=> ( ip(X33)
& ip(X34)
& ! [X4,X7] :
~ ( iext(X33,X4,X7)
& iext(X34,X4,X7) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_eqdis_propertydisjointwith) ).
fof(testcase_premise_fullish_019_Disjoint_Annotation_Properties,axiom,
( iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_skos_prefLabel,uri_owl_AnnotationProperty)
& iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,uri_skos_prefLabel,uri_rdfs_label)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_skos_altLabel,uri_owl_AnnotationProperty)
& iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,uri_skos_altLabel,uri_rdfs_label)
& iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,uri_skos_prefLabel,uri_skos_altLabel)
& iext(uri_skos_prefLabel,uri_ex_foo,literal_plain(dat_str_foo))
& iext(uri_skos_altLabel,uri_ex_foo,literal_plain(dat_str_foo)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_premise_fullish_019_Disjoint_Annotation_Properties) ).
fof(c_0_2,plain,
! [X831,X832,X833,X834,X835,X836] :
( ( ip(X831)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X831,X832) )
& ( ip(X832)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X831,X832) )
& ( ~ iext(X831,X833,X834)
| ~ iext(X832,X833,X834)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X831,X832) )
& ( iext(X835,esk119_2(X835,X836),esk120_2(X835,X836))
| ~ ip(X835)
| ~ ip(X836)
| iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X835,X836) )
& ( iext(X836,esk119_2(X835,X836),esk120_2(X835,X836))
| ~ ip(X835)
| ~ ip(X836)
| iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X835,X836) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_eqdis_propertydisjointwith])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,plain,
( ~ iext(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ iext(X4,X2,X3)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X1,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,uri_skos_prefLabel,uri_skos_altLabel),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_019_Disjoint_Annotation_Properties]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_skos_altLabel,X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_skos_prefLabel,X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
iext(uri_skos_altLabel,uri_ex_foo,literal_plain(dat_str_foo)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_019_Disjoint_Annotation_Properties]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
iext(uri_skos_prefLabel,uri_ex_foo,literal_plain(dat_str_foo)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_019_Disjoint_Annotation_Properties]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14 % Problem : SWB019+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Wed Jun 1 14:27:37 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.47 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.21/0.49 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.49 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.21/0.49 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.21/0.49 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 4.02/1.71 [LightGBM] [Fatal] Data file /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-j1nvp7ao/test couldn't be read
% 4.02/1.71 [26299] Failed to execute script predict4sine1
% 4.02/1.71 Traceback (most recent call last):
% 4.02/1.71 File "predict4sine1.py", line 24, in <module>
% 4.02/1.71 File "site-packages/lightgbm/basic.py", line 1037, in construct
% 4.02/1.71 File "site-packages/lightgbm/basic.py", line 833, in _lazy_init
% 4.02/1.71 File "site-packages/lightgbm/basic.py", line 47, in _safe_call
% 4.02/1.71 lightgbm.basic.LightGBMError: Data file /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-j1nvp7ao/test couldn't be read
% 9.52/2.67 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 9.52/2.67 # No SInE strategy applied
% 9.52/2.67 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 9.52/2.67 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 9.52/2.67 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 9.52/2.67 #
% 9.52/2.67 # Preprocessing time : 0.088 s
% 9.52/2.67 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 9.52/2.67
% 9.52/2.67 # Proof found!
% 9.52/2.67 # SZS status Theorem
% 9.52/2.67 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 9.52/2.67 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 9.52/2.67
% 9.52/2.67 # -------------------------------------------------
% 9.52/2.67 # User time : 0.289 s
% 9.52/2.67 # System time : 0.013 s
% 9.52/2.67 # Total time : 0.302 s
% 9.52/2.67 # Maximum resident set size: 7116 pages
% 9.52/2.67
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------