TSTP Solution File: SWB018+1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SWB018+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:37:58 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 5.69s 1.29s
% Output : CNFRefutation 5.69s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 19 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 51 ( 4 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 15 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 52 ( 20 ~; 19 |; 9 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 15 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 31 ( 4 sgn; 18 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(owl_eqdis_sameas,axiom,
! [X4,X7] :
( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X4,X7)
<=> X4 = X7 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.eI6XdwZjSA/E---3.1_11269.p',owl_eqdis_sameas) ).
fof(owl_rdfsext_domain,axiom,
! [X2,X5] :
( iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X2,X5)
<=> ( ip(X2)
& ic(X5)
& ! [X4,X7] :
( iext(X2,X4,X7)
=> icext(X5,X4) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.eI6XdwZjSA/E---3.1_11269.p',owl_rdfsext_domain) ).
fof(rdfs_cext_def,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X4,X5)
<=> icext(X5,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.eI6XdwZjSA/E---3.1_11269.p',rdfs_cext_def) ).
fof(testcase_premise_fullish_018_Modified_Logical_Vocabulary_Semantics,axiom,
( iext(uri_rdfs_domain,uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_Person)
& iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.eI6XdwZjSA/E---3.1_11269.p',testcase_premise_fullish_018_Modified_Logical_Vocabulary_Semantics) ).
fof(testcase_conclusion_fullish_018_Modified_Logical_Vocabulary_Semantics,conjecture,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_u,uri_ex_Person),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.eI6XdwZjSA/E---3.1_11269.p',testcase_conclusion_fullish_018_Modified_Logical_Vocabulary_Semantics) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X77,X78] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X77,X78)
| X77 = X78 )
& ( X77 != X78
| iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X77,X78) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_eqdis_sameas])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X59,X60,X61,X62,X63,X64] :
( ( ip(X59)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X59,X60) )
& ( ic(X60)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X59,X60) )
& ( ~ iext(X59,X61,X62)
| icext(X60,X61)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X59,X60) )
& ( iext(X63,esk1_2(X63,X64),esk2_2(X63,X64))
| ~ ip(X63)
| ~ ic(X64)
| iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X63,X64) )
& ( ~ icext(X64,esk1_2(X63,X64))
| ~ ip(X63)
| ~ ic(X64)
| iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X63,X64) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_rdfsext_domain])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X2)
| X1 != X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( icext(X4,X2)
| ~ iext(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X1,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X1),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X46,X47] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X46,X47)
| icext(X47,X46) )
& ( ~ icext(X47,X46)
| iext(uri_rdf_type,X46,X47) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdfs_cext_def])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( icext(X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_domain,uri_owl_sameAs,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
iext(uri_rdfs_domain,uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_Person),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_018_Modified_Logical_Vocabulary_Semantics]) ).
fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_u,uri_ex_Person),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[testcase_conclusion_fullish_018_Modified_Logical_Vocabulary_Semantics])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X2,X1)
| ~ icext(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
icext(uri_ex_Person,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_u,uri_ex_Person),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,uri_ex_Person),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWB018+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 20:42:52 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.52 Running first-order model finding
% 0.19/0.52 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.eI6XdwZjSA/E---3.1_11269.p
% 5.69/1.29 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 5.69/1.29 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 5.69/1.29 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 5.69/1.29 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 5.69/1.29 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 5.69/1.29 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 5.69/1.29 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 5.69/1.29 # sh5l with pid 11389 completed with status 0
% 5.69/1.29 # Result found by sh5l
% 5.69/1.29 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 5.69/1.29 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 5.69/1.29 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 5.69/1.29 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 5.69/1.29 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 5.69/1.29 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 5.69/1.29 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 5.69/1.29 # Search class: FGHSF-FMLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 5.69/1.29 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 5.69/1.29 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 181s (1) cores
% 5.69/1.29 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with pid 11398 completed with status 0
% 5.69/1.29 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d
% 5.69/1.29 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 5.69/1.29 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 5.69/1.29 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 5.69/1.29 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 5.69/1.29 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 5.69/1.29 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 5.69/1.29 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 5.69/1.29 # Search class: FGHSF-FMLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 5.69/1.29 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 5.69/1.29 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 181s (1) cores
% 5.69/1.29 # Preprocessing time : 0.026 s
% 5.69/1.29 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 5.69/1.29
% 5.69/1.29 # Proof found!
% 5.69/1.29 # SZS status Theorem
% 5.69/1.29 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 5.69/1.29 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 5.69/1.29 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 213
% 5.69/1.29 # Initial clauses : 955
% 5.69/1.29 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 40
% 5.69/1.29 # Initial clauses in saturation : 915
% 5.69/1.29 # Processed clauses : 4858
% 5.69/1.29 # ...of these trivial : 186
% 5.69/1.29 # ...subsumed : 1519
% 5.69/1.29 # ...remaining for further processing : 3153
% 5.69/1.29 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 15
% 5.69/1.29 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 5.69/1.29 # Backward-subsumed : 75
% 5.69/1.29 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 5.69/1.29 # Generated clauses : 19424
% 5.69/1.29 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 17812
% 5.69/1.29 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 5.69/1.29 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 18
% 5.69/1.29 # Paramodulations : 19409
% 5.69/1.29 # Factorizations : 0
% 5.69/1.29 # NegExts : 0
% 5.69/1.29 # Equation resolutions : 15
% 5.69/1.29 # Total rewrite steps : 2738
% 5.69/1.29 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 5.69/1.29 # Propositional check models : 0
% 5.69/1.29 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 5.69/1.29 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 5.69/1.29 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 5.69/1.29 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 5.69/1.29 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 5.69/1.29 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 5.69/1.29 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 5.69/1.29 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 5.69/1.29 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 5.69/1.29 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 5.69/1.29 # Current number of processed clauses : 2221
% 5.69/1.29 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 576
% 5.69/1.29 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 5.69/1.29 # Negative unit clauses : 30
% 5.69/1.29 # Non-unit-clauses : 1615
% 5.69/1.29 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 14708
% 5.69/1.29 # ...number of literals in the above : 59485
% 5.69/1.29 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 5.69/1.29 # Current number of archived clauses : 917
% 5.69/1.29 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 848267
% 5.69/1.29 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 235558
% 5.69/1.29 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1306
% 5.69/1.29 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 29540
% 5.69/1.29 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 5.69/1.29 # BW rewrite match attempts : 278
% 5.69/1.29 # BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 5.69/1.29 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 5.69/1.29 # Condensation successes : 0
% 5.69/1.29 # Termbank termtop insertions : 417006
% 5.69/1.29
% 5.69/1.29 # -------------------------------------------------
% 5.69/1.29 # User time : 0.694 s
% 5.69/1.29 # System time : 0.031 s
% 5.69/1.29 # Total time : 0.724 s
% 5.69/1.29 # Maximum resident set size: 5288 pages
% 5.69/1.29
% 5.69/1.29 # -------------------------------------------------
% 5.69/1.29 # User time : 0.714 s
% 5.69/1.29 # System time : 0.034 s
% 5.69/1.29 # Total time : 0.748 s
% 5.69/1.29 # Maximum resident set size: 2232 pages
% 5.69/1.29 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------