TSTP Solution File: SWB017+2 by SInE---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : SWB017+2 : TPTP v5.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Feb 15 23:48:47 EST 2011
% Result : Theorem 0.17s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 26 ( 13 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 93 ( 7 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 15 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 111 ( 44 ~; 38 |; 27 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 13 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 42 ( 0 sgn 30 !; 4 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X1,X2)
<=> X1 != X2 ),
file('/tmp/tmpaAvFmv/sel_SWB017+2.p_1',owl_eqdis_differentfrom) ).
fof(2,axiom,
! [X3,X4] :
( iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X3,X4)
<=> ( ip(X3)
& ip(X4)
& ! [X1,X2] :
~ ( iext(X3,X1,X2)
& iext(X4,X1,X2) ) ) ),
file('/tmp/tmpaAvFmv/sel_SWB017+2.p_1',owl_eqdis_propertydisjointwith) ).
fof(3,axiom,
( iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,uri_ex_notInstanceOf,uri_rdf_type)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c)
& iext(uri_ex_notInstanceOf,uri_ex_u,uri_ex_c) ),
file('/tmp/tmpaAvFmv/sel_SWB017+2.p_1',testcase_premise_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions) ).
fof(4,conjecture,
iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
file('/tmp/tmpaAvFmv/sel_SWB017+2.p_1',testcase_conclusion_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions) ).
fof(5,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[4]) ).
fof(6,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[5,theory(equality)]) ).
fof(7,plain,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X1,X2)
| X1 != X2 )
& ( X1 = X2
| iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X1,X2) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[1]) ).
fof(8,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X3,X4)
| X3 != X4 )
& ( X3 = X4
| iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X3,X4) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[7]) ).
cnf(9,plain,
( iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X1,X2)
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
fof(11,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X3,X4)
| ( ip(X3)
& ip(X4)
& ! [X1,X2] :
( ~ iext(X3,X1,X2)
| ~ iext(X4,X1,X2) ) ) )
& ( ~ ip(X3)
| ~ ip(X4)
| ? [X1,X2] :
( iext(X3,X1,X2)
& iext(X4,X1,X2) )
| iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X3,X4) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
fof(12,plain,
! [X5,X6] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X5,X6)
| ( ip(X5)
& ip(X6)
& ! [X7,X8] :
( ~ iext(X5,X7,X8)
| ~ iext(X6,X7,X8) ) ) )
& ( ~ ip(X5)
| ~ ip(X6)
| ? [X9,X10] :
( iext(X5,X9,X10)
& iext(X6,X9,X10) )
| iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X5,X6) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[11]) ).
fof(13,plain,
! [X5,X6] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X5,X6)
| ( ip(X5)
& ip(X6)
& ! [X7,X8] :
( ~ iext(X5,X7,X8)
| ~ iext(X6,X7,X8) ) ) )
& ( ~ ip(X5)
| ~ ip(X6)
| ( iext(X5,esk1_2(X5,X6),esk2_2(X5,X6))
& iext(X6,esk1_2(X5,X6),esk2_2(X5,X6)) )
| iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X5,X6) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[12]) ).
fof(14,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7,X8] :
( ( ( ( ~ iext(X5,X7,X8)
| ~ iext(X6,X7,X8) )
& ip(X5)
& ip(X6) )
| ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X5,X6) )
& ( ~ ip(X5)
| ~ ip(X6)
| ( iext(X5,esk1_2(X5,X6),esk2_2(X5,X6))
& iext(X6,esk1_2(X5,X6),esk2_2(X5,X6)) )
| iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X5,X6) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[13]) ).
fof(15,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7,X8] :
( ( ~ iext(X5,X7,X8)
| ~ iext(X6,X7,X8)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X5,X6) )
& ( ip(X5)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X5,X6) )
& ( ip(X6)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X5,X6) )
& ( iext(X5,esk1_2(X5,X6),esk2_2(X5,X6))
| ~ ip(X5)
| ~ ip(X6)
| iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X5,X6) )
& ( iext(X6,esk1_2(X5,X6),esk2_2(X5,X6))
| ~ ip(X5)
| ~ ip(X6)
| iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X5,X6) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[14]) ).
cnf(20,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X1,X2)
| ~ iext(X2,X3,X4)
| ~ iext(X1,X3,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[15]) ).
cnf(21,plain,
iext(uri_ex_notInstanceOf,uri_ex_u,uri_ex_c),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
cnf(22,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
cnf(23,plain,
iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,uri_ex_notInstanceOf,uri_rdf_type),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
cnf(24,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[6]) ).
cnf(25,negated_conjecture,
uri_ex_w = uri_ex_u,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[24,9,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(31,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_ex_notInstanceOf,X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[20,23,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(36,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_u,uri_ex_c),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[22,25,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(39,plain,
~ iext(uri_ex_notInstanceOf,uri_ex_u,uri_ex_c),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[31,36,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(42,plain,
$false,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[39,21,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(43,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[42,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(44,plain,
$false,
43,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SWB/SWB017+2.p
% --creating new selector for []
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpaAvFmv/sel_SWB017+2.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem SWB017+2.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SWB/SWB017+2.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SWB/SWB017+2.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------