TSTP Solution File: SWB017+2 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWB017+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 19:02:01 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.24s 1.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 46 ( 5 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 15 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 49 ( 21 ~; 16 |; 10 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 15 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 24 ( 4 sgn 16 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(testcase_conclusion_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions,conjecture,
iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',testcase_conclusion_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions) ).
fof(owl_eqdis_differentfrom,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X1,X2)
<=> X1 != X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',owl_eqdis_differentfrom) ).
fof(owl_eqdis_propertydisjointwith,axiom,
! [X3,X4] :
( iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X3,X4)
<=> ( ip(X3)
& ip(X4)
& ! [X1,X2] :
~ ( iext(X3,X1,X2)
& iext(X4,X1,X2) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',owl_eqdis_propertydisjointwith) ).
fof(testcase_premise_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions,axiom,
( iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,uri_ex_notInstanceOf,uri_rdf_type)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c)
& iext(uri_ex_notInstanceOf,uri_ex_u,uri_ex_c) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',testcase_premise_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[testcase_conclusion_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X3,X4,X3,X4] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X3,X4)
| X3 != X4 )
& ( X3 = X4
| iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X3,X4) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_eqdis_differentfrom])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7,X8,X5,X6] :
( ( ip(X5)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X5,X6) )
& ( ip(X6)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X5,X6) )
& ( ~ iext(X5,X7,X8)
| ~ iext(X6,X7,X8)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X5,X6) )
& ( iext(X5,esk1_2(X5,X6),esk2_2(X5,X6))
| ~ ip(X5)
| ~ ip(X6)
| iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X5,X6) )
& ( iext(X6,esk1_2(X5,X6),esk2_2(X5,X6))
| ~ ip(X5)
| ~ ip(X6)
| iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X5,X6) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_eqdis_propertydisjointwith])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X1,X2)
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X1,X2)
| ~ iext(X2,X3,X4)
| ~ iext(X1,X3,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,uri_ex_notInstanceOf,uri_rdf_type),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
uri_ex_w = uri_ex_u,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_ex_notInstanceOf,X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_u,uri_ex_c),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
iext(uri_ex_notInstanceOf,uri_ex_u,uri_ex_c),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWB017+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 1 11:35:33 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.24/1.42 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.24/1.42 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.24/1.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.013 s
% 0.24/1.42
% 0.24/1.42 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.24/1.42 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.24/1.42 # Parsed axioms : 4
% 0.24/1.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 2
% 0.24/1.42 # Initial clauses : 3
% 0.24/1.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 0.24/1.42 # Processed clauses : 6
% 0.24/1.42 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.24/1.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 5
% 0.24/1.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.24/1.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.24/1.42 # Generated clauses : 2
% 0.24/1.42 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 3
% 0.24/1.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Paramodulations : 1
% 0.24/1.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 3
% 0.24/1.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.24/1.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.24/1.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.24/1.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.24/1.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.24/1.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.24/1.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.24/1.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 157
% 0.24/1.42
% 0.24/1.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/1.42 # User time : 0.009 s
% 0.24/1.42 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.24/1.42 # Total time : 0.013 s
% 0.24/1.42 # Maximum resident set size: 2768 pages
% 0.24/1.42 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.24/1.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.014 s
% 0.24/1.42
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof found!
% 0.24/1.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/1.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object total steps : 18
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object clause steps : 10
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object formula steps : 8
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object initial clauses used : 6
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object initial formulas used : 4
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object generating inferences : 3
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 3
% 0.24/1.42 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.24/1.42 # Parsed axioms : 4
% 0.24/1.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Initial clauses : 11
% 0.24/1.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 11
% 0.24/1.42 # Processed clauses : 18
% 0.24/1.42 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.24/1.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 17
% 0.24/1.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.24/1.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.24/1.42 # Generated clauses : 14
% 0.24/1.42 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 15
% 0.24/1.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Paramodulations : 13
% 0.24/1.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 14
% 0.24/1.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 6
% 0.24/1.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.24/1.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 7
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 8
% 0.24/1.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 32
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.24/1.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5
% 0.24/1.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.24/1.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.24/1.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.24/1.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 670
% 0.24/1.42
% 0.24/1.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/1.42 # User time : 0.011 s
% 0.24/1.42 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.24/1.42 # Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.24/1.42 # Maximum resident set size: 2772 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------