TSTP Solution File: SWB017+2 by CSE---1.6

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.6
% Problem  : SWB017+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 20:01:15 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.63s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SWB017+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Sun Aug 27 07:33:23 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.57  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.62  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62  % File        :CSE---1.6
% 0.20/0.62  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.62  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.20/0.62  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.20/0.62  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.62  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.62  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.63  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.63  % File     : SWB017+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.20/0.63  % Domain   : Semantic Web
% 0.20/0.63  % Problem  : Built-in Based Definitions
% 0.20/0.63  % Version  : [Sch11] axioms : Reduced > Incomplete.
% 0.20/0.63  % English  :
% 0.20/0.63  
% 0.20/0.63  % Refs     : [Sch11] Schneider, M. (2011), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.20/0.63  % Source   : [Sch11]
% 0.20/0.63  % Names    : 017_Built-in_Based_Definitions [Sch11]
% 0.20/0.63  
% 0.20/0.63  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.20/0.63  % Rating   : 0.14 v7.5.0, 0.16 v7.4.0, 0.07 v7.2.0, 0.03 v7.1.0, 0.04 v7.0.0, 0.03 v6.4.0, 0.04 v6.2.0, 0.16 v6.1.0, 0.17 v6.0.0, 0.13 v5.5.0, 0.07 v5.3.0, 0.15 v5.2.0
% 0.20/0.63  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    4 (   1 unt;   0 def)
% 0.20/0.63  %            Number of atoms       :   11 (   1 equ)
% 0.20/0.63  %            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
% 0.20/0.63  %            Number of connectives :    9 (   2   ~;   0   |;   5   &)
% 0.20/0.63  %                                         (   2 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.20/0.63  %            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   5 avg)
% 0.20/0.63  %            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
% 0.20/0.63  %            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   0 prp; 1-3 aty)
% 0.20/0.63  %            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   7 con; 0-0 aty)
% 0.20/0.63  %            Number of variables   :    6 (   6   !;   0   ?)
% 0.20/0.63  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ
% 0.20/0.63  
% 0.20/0.63  % Comments :
% 0.20/0.63  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.63  fof(owl_eqdis_differentfrom,axiom,
% 0.20/0.63      ! [X,Y] :
% 0.20/0.63        ( iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X,Y)
% 0.20/0.63      <=> X != Y ) ).
% 0.20/0.63  
% 0.20/0.63  fof(owl_eqdis_propertydisjointwith,axiom,
% 0.20/0.63      ! [P1,P2] :
% 0.20/0.63        ( iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,P1,P2)
% 0.20/0.63      <=> ( ip(P1)
% 0.20/0.63          & ip(P2)
% 0.20/0.63          & ! [X,Y] :
% 0.20/0.63              ~ ( iext(P1,X,Y)
% 0.20/0.63                & iext(P2,X,Y) ) ) ) ).
% 0.20/0.63  
% 0.20/0.63  fof(testcase_conclusion_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions,conjecture,
% 0.20/0.63      iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u) ).
% 0.20/0.63  
% 0.20/0.63  fof(testcase_premise_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions,axiom,
% 0.20/0.63      ( iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,uri_ex_notInstanceOf,uri_rdf_type)
% 0.20/0.63      & iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c)
% 0.20/0.63      & iext(uri_ex_notInstanceOf,uri_ex_u,uri_ex_c) ) ).
% 0.20/0.63  
% 0.20/0.63  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.63  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.63  % Proof found
% 0.20/0.63  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.63  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.63  %ClaNum:22(EqnAxiom:11)
% 0.20/0.63  %VarNum:40(SingletonVarNum:16)
% 0.20/0.63  %MaxLitNum:4
% 0.20/0.63  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.20/0.63  %SharedTerms:11
% 0.20/0.63  %goalClause: 15
% 0.20/0.63  %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.20/0.63  [12]P1(a1,a2,a9)
% 0.20/0.63  [13]P1(a2,a6,a3)
% 0.20/0.63  [14]P1(a9,a7,a3)
% 0.20/0.63  [15]~P1(a8,a7,a6)
% 0.20/0.63  [16]E(x161,x162)+P1(a8,x161,x162)
% 0.20/0.63  [17]~E(x171,x172)+~P1(a8,x171,x172)
% 0.20/0.63  [18]P2(x181)+~P1(a1,x182,x181)
% 0.20/0.63  [19]P2(x191)+~P1(a1,x191,x192)
% 0.20/0.63  [22]~P1(x221,x222,x223)+~P1(x224,x222,x223)+~P1(a1,x224,x221)
% 0.20/0.63  [20]~P2(x201)+~P2(x202)+P1(x202,f4(x201,x202),f5(x201,x202))+P1(a1,x201,x202)
% 0.20/0.63  [21]~P2(x212)+~P2(x211)+P1(x211,f4(x211,x212),f5(x211,x212))+P1(a1,x211,x212)
% 0.20/0.63  %EqnAxiom
% 0.20/0.63  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.20/0.63  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.20/0.63  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.20/0.63  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f4(x41,x43),f4(x42,x43))
% 0.20/0.63  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f4(x53,x51),f4(x53,x52))
% 0.20/0.63  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f5(x61,x63),f5(x62,x63))
% 0.20/0.63  [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f5(x73,x71),f5(x73,x72))
% 0.20/0.63  [8]P1(x82,x83,x84)+~E(x81,x82)+~P1(x81,x83,x84)
% 0.20/0.63  [9]P1(x93,x92,x94)+~E(x91,x92)+~P1(x93,x91,x94)
% 0.20/0.63  [10]P1(x103,x104,x102)+~E(x101,x102)+~P1(x103,x104,x101)
% 0.20/0.63  [11]~P2(x111)+P2(x112)+~E(x111,x112)
% 0.20/0.63  
% 0.20/0.63  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.63  cnf(28,plain,
% 0.20/0.63     (~P1(a2,a7,a3)),
% 0.20/0.63     inference(scs_inference,[],[15,12,14,19,18,16,9,22])).
% 0.20/0.63  cnf(30,plain,
% 0.20/0.63     (E(f5(x301,a7),f5(x301,a6))),
% 0.20/0.63     inference(scs_inference,[],[15,12,14,19,18,16,9,22,7])).
% 0.20/0.63  cnf(31,plain,
% 0.20/0.63     (E(f5(a7,x311),f5(a6,x311))),
% 0.20/0.63     inference(scs_inference,[],[15,12,14,19,18,16,9,22,7,6])).
% 0.20/0.63  cnf(37,plain,
% 0.20/0.63     (E(a6,a7)),
% 0.20/0.63     inference(scs_inference,[],[15,12,14,19,18,16,9,22,7,6,5,4,11,10,8,2])).
% 0.20/0.63  cnf(38,plain,
% 0.20/0.63     (E(f5(a7,a7),f5(a6,a6))),
% 0.20/0.63     inference(scs_inference,[],[15,12,14,19,18,16,9,22,7,6,5,4,11,10,8,2,3])).
% 0.20/0.63  cnf(44,plain,
% 0.20/0.63     (~P1(a8,f5(x441,a7),f5(x441,a6))),
% 0.20/0.63     inference(scs_inference,[],[30,17])).
% 0.20/0.63  cnf(62,plain,
% 0.20/0.63     (E(f5(a6,a6),f5(a7,a7))),
% 0.20/0.63     inference(scs_inference,[],[12,38,22,2])).
% 0.20/0.63  cnf(76,plain,
% 0.20/0.63     (E(f5(a7,x761),f5(a6,x761))),
% 0.20/0.63     inference(rename_variables,[],[31])).
% 0.20/0.63  cnf(79,plain,
% 0.20/0.63     ($false),
% 0.20/0.64     inference(scs_inference,[],[13,62,44,28,31,76,37,10,3,9]),
% 0.20/0.64     ['proof']).
% 0.20/0.64  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.64  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------