TSTP Solution File: SWB017+1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SWB017+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 04:20:02 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.73s 0.91s
% Output   : Refutation 0.73s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   88 (   6 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   99 (  37   ~;  27   |;  29   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   52 (  44   !;   8   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f619,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f618,f601]) ).

fof(f601,plain,
    iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f561]) ).

fof(f561,axiom,
    ( iext(uri_ex_notInstanceOf,uri_ex_u,uri_ex_c)
    & iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c)
    & iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,uri_ex_notInstanceOf,uri_rdf_type) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_premise_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions) ).

fof(f618,plain,
    ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c),
    inference(resolution,[],[f617,f615]) ).

fof(f615,plain,
    iext(uri_ex_notInstanceOf,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c),
    inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f602,f613]) ).

fof(f613,plain,
    uri_ex_w = uri_ex_u,
    inference(resolution,[],[f598,f596]) ).

fof(f596,plain,
    ~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f562]) ).

fof(f562,plain,
    ~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
    inference(flattening,[],[f560]) ).

fof(f560,negated_conjecture,
    ~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f559]) ).

fof(f559,conjecture,
    iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_conclusion_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions) ).

fof(f598,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X0,X1)
      | X0 = X1 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f590]) ).

fof(f590,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X0,X1)
        | X0 = X1 )
      & ( X0 != X1
        | ~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f563]) ).

fof(f563,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X0,X1)
    <=> X0 != X1 ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f345]) ).

fof(f345,axiom,
    ! [X3,X6] :
      ( iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X3,X6)
    <=> X3 != X6 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',owl_eqdis_differentfrom) ).

fof(f602,plain,
    iext(uri_ex_notInstanceOf,uri_ex_u,uri_ex_c),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f561]) ).

fof(f617,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ iext(uri_ex_notInstanceOf,X0,X1)
      | ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X0,X1) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f606,f600]) ).

fof(f600,plain,
    iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,uri_ex_notInstanceOf,uri_rdf_type),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f561]) ).

fof(f606,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X4,X5] :
      ( ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X0,X1)
      | ~ iext(X0,X4,X5)
      | ~ iext(X1,X4,X5) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f595]) ).

fof(f595,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X0,X1)
        | ( iext(X1,sK0(X0,X1),sK1(X0,X1))
          & iext(X0,sK0(X0,X1),sK1(X0,X1)) )
        | ~ ip(X1)
        | ~ ip(X0) )
      & ( ( ! [X4,X5] :
              ( ~ iext(X1,X4,X5)
              | ~ iext(X0,X4,X5) )
          & ip(X1)
          & ip(X0) )
        | ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f593,f594]) ).

fof(f594,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ? [X2,X3] :
          ( iext(X1,X2,X3)
          & iext(X0,X2,X3) )
     => ( iext(X1,sK0(X0,X1),sK1(X0,X1))
        & iext(X0,sK0(X0,X1),sK1(X0,X1)) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f593,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X0,X1)
        | ? [X2,X3] :
            ( iext(X1,X2,X3)
            & iext(X0,X2,X3) )
        | ~ ip(X1)
        | ~ ip(X0) )
      & ( ( ! [X4,X5] :
              ( ~ iext(X1,X4,X5)
              | ~ iext(X0,X4,X5) )
          & ip(X1)
          & ip(X0) )
        | ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f592]) ).

fof(f592,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X0,X1)
        | ? [X2,X3] :
            ( iext(X1,X2,X3)
            & iext(X0,X2,X3) )
        | ~ ip(X1)
        | ~ ip(X0) )
      & ( ( ! [X2,X3] :
              ( ~ iext(X1,X2,X3)
              | ~ iext(X0,X2,X3) )
          & ip(X1)
          & ip(X0) )
        | ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f591]) ).

fof(f591,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X0,X1)
        | ? [X2,X3] :
            ( iext(X1,X2,X3)
            & iext(X0,X2,X3) )
        | ~ ip(X1)
        | ~ ip(X0) )
      & ( ( ! [X2,X3] :
              ( ~ iext(X1,X2,X3)
              | ~ iext(X0,X2,X3) )
          & ip(X1)
          & ip(X0) )
        | ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f588]) ).

fof(f588,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X0,X1)
    <=> ( ! [X2,X3] :
            ( ~ iext(X1,X2,X3)
            | ~ iext(X0,X2,X3) )
        & ip(X1)
        & ip(X0) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f574]) ).

fof(f574,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X0,X1)
    <=> ( ! [X2,X3] :
            ~ ( iext(X1,X2,X3)
              & iext(X0,X2,X3) )
        & ip(X1)
        & ip(X0) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f353]) ).

fof(f353,axiom,
    ! [X32,X33] :
      ( iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X32,X33)
    <=> ( ! [X3,X6] :
            ~ ( iext(X33,X3,X6)
              & iext(X32,X3,X6) )
        & ip(X33)
        & ip(X32) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',owl_eqdis_propertydisjointwith) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem    : SWB017+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.12/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime   : Sat May 18 14:11:08 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.36  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.15/0.37  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.73/0.91  % (24754)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/33Mi)
% 0.73/0.91  % (24751)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/34Mi)
% 0.73/0.91  % (24753)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/78Mi)
% 0.73/0.91  % (24752)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/51Mi)
% 0.73/0.91  % (24756)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/45Mi)
% 0.73/0.91  % (24755)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/34Mi)
% 0.73/0.91  % (24757)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/83Mi)
% 0.73/0.91  % (24751)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (24751)------------------------------
% 0.73/0.91  % (24751)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.73/0.91  % (24756)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (24756)------------------------------
% 0.73/0.91  % (24756)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.73/0.91  % (24754)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (24754)------------------------------
% 0.73/0.91  % (24754)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.73/0.91  % (24756)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.73/0.91  % (24754)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.73/0.91  
% 0.73/0.91  
% 0.73/0.91  % (24754)Memory used [KB]: 1388
% 0.73/0.91  % (24756)Memory used [KB]: 1429
% 0.73/0.91  % (24756)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.73/0.91  % (24754)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.73/0.91  % (24756)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.73/0.91  % (24754)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.73/0.91  % (24751)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.73/0.91  
% 0.73/0.91  % (24751)Memory used [KB]: 1376
% 0.73/0.91  % (24751)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.73/0.91  % (24751)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.73/0.91  % (24753)First to succeed.
% 0.73/0.91  % (24754)------------------------------
% 0.73/0.91  % (24754)------------------------------
% 0.73/0.91  % (24756)------------------------------
% 0.73/0.91  % (24756)------------------------------
% 0.73/0.91  % (24751)------------------------------
% 0.73/0.91  % (24751)------------------------------
% 0.73/0.91  % (24758)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/56Mi)
% 0.73/0.91  % (24753)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-24750"
% 0.73/0.91  % (24757)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (24757)------------------------------
% 0.73/0.91  % (24757)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.73/0.91  % (24757)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.73/0.91  
% 0.73/0.91  % (24757)Memory used [KB]: 1429
% 0.73/0.91  % (24757)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.73/0.91  % (24757)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 0.73/0.91  % (24757)------------------------------
% 0.73/0.91  % (24757)------------------------------
% 0.73/0.91  % (24753)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.73/0.91  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.73/0.91  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.73/0.91  % (24753)------------------------------
% 0.73/0.91  % (24753)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.73/0.91  % (24753)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.73/0.91  
% 0.73/0.91  % (24753)Memory used [KB]: 1463
% 0.73/0.91  % (24753)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.73/0.91  % (24753)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 0.73/0.91  % (24750)Success in time 0.54 s
% 0.73/0.91  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------