TSTP Solution File: SWB017+1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SWB017+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 09:35:48 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 1.40s 0.79s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.40s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 19 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 48 ( 6 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 15 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 51 ( 22 ~; 16 |; 10 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 15 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 23 ( 0 sgn 16 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(testcase_conclusion_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions,conjecture,
iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.0u3nCVvfR2/E---3.1_4508.p',testcase_conclusion_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions) ).
fof(owl_eqdis_differentfrom,axiom,
! [X4,X7] :
( iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X4,X7)
<=> X4 != X7 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.0u3nCVvfR2/E---3.1_4508.p',owl_eqdis_differentfrom) ).
fof(owl_eqdis_propertydisjointwith,axiom,
! [X33,X34] :
( iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X33,X34)
<=> ( ip(X33)
& ip(X34)
& ! [X4,X7] :
~ ( iext(X33,X4,X7)
& iext(X34,X4,X7) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.0u3nCVvfR2/E---3.1_4508.p',owl_eqdis_propertydisjointwith) ).
fof(testcase_premise_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions,axiom,
( iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,uri_ex_notInstanceOf,uri_rdf_type)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c)
& iext(uri_ex_notInstanceOf,uri_ex_u,uri_ex_c) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.0u3nCVvfR2/E---3.1_4508.p',testcase_premise_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[testcase_conclusion_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X4,X7] :
( iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X4,X7)
<=> X4 != X7 ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[owl_eqdis_differentfrom]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X47,X48] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X47,X48)
| X47 != X48 )
& ( X47 = X48
| iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X47,X48) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X81,X82,X83,X84,X85,X86] :
( ( ip(X81)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X81,X82) )
& ( ip(X82)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X81,X82) )
& ( ~ iext(X81,X83,X84)
| ~ iext(X82,X83,X84)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X81,X82) )
& ( iext(X85,esk5_2(X85,X86),esk6_2(X85,X86))
| ~ ip(X85)
| ~ ip(X86)
| iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X85,X86) )
& ( iext(X86,esk5_2(X85,X86),esk6_2(X85,X86))
| ~ ip(X85)
| ~ ip(X86)
| iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X85,X86) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_eqdis_propertydisjointwith])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( X1 = X2
| iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ iext(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ iext(X4,X2,X3)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X1,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
iext(uri_ex_notInstanceOf,uri_ex_u,uri_ex_c),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
uri_ex_u = uri_ex_w,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X1,uri_rdf_type)
| ~ iext(X1,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,uri_ex_notInstanceOf,uri_rdf_type),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
iext(uri_ex_notInstanceOf,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.13 % Problem : SWB017+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.13/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Fri May 3 11:53:12 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.0u3nCVvfR2/E---3.1_4508.p
% 1.40/0.79 # Version: 3.1.0
% 1.40/0.79 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.40/0.79 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.40/0.79 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 1.40/0.79 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 1.40/0.79 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 1.40/0.79 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.40/0.79 # sh5l with pid 4592 completed with status 0
% 1.40/0.79 # Result found by sh5l
% 1.40/0.79 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.40/0.79 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.40/0.79 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 1.40/0.79 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 1.40/0.79 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 1.40/0.79 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.40/0.79 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 1.40/0.79 # Search class: FGHSF-FMLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 1.40/0.79 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.40/0.79 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 181s (1) cores
% 1.40/0.79 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with pid 4601 completed with status 0
% 1.40/0.79 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d
% 1.40/0.79 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.40/0.79 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.40/0.79 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 1.40/0.79 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 1.40/0.79 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 1.40/0.79 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.40/0.79 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 1.40/0.79 # Search class: FGHSF-FMLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 1.40/0.79 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.40/0.79 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 181s (1) cores
% 1.40/0.79 # Preprocessing time : 0.017 s
% 1.40/0.79 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.40/0.79
% 1.40/0.79 # Proof found!
% 1.40/0.79 # SZS status Theorem
% 1.40/0.79 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.40/0.79 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 1.40/0.79 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 231
% 1.40/0.79 # Initial clauses : 937
% 1.40/0.79 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 40
% 1.40/0.79 # Initial clauses in saturation : 897
% 1.40/0.79 # Processed clauses : 1972
% 1.40/0.79 # ...of these trivial : 96
% 1.40/0.79 # ...subsumed : 378
% 1.40/0.79 # ...remaining for further processing : 1498
% 1.40/0.79 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 15
% 1.40/0.79 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.40/0.79 # Backward-subsumed : 6
% 1.40/0.79 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 1.40/0.79 # Generated clauses : 2236
% 1.40/0.79 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1965
% 1.40/0.79 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 1.40/0.79 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 9
% 1.40/0.79 # Paramodulations : 2221
% 1.40/0.79 # Factorizations : 0
% 1.40/0.79 # NegExts : 0
% 1.40/0.79 # Equation resolutions : 15
% 1.40/0.79 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 1.40/0.79 # Total rewrite steps : 753
% 1.40/0.79 # ...of those cached : 602
% 1.40/0.79 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 1.40/0.79 # Propositional check models : 0
% 1.40/0.79 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.40/0.79 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 1.40/0.79 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.40/0.79 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 1.40/0.79 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 1.40/0.79 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 1.40/0.79 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 1.40/0.79 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 1.40/0.79 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 1.40/0.79 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 1.40/0.79 # Current number of processed clauses : 656
% 1.40/0.79 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 274
% 1.40/0.79 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.40/0.79 # Negative unit clauses : 38
% 1.40/0.79 # Non-unit-clauses : 344
% 1.40/0.79 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1709
% 1.40/0.79 # ...number of literals in the above : 6271
% 1.40/0.79 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.40/0.79 # Current number of archived clauses : 827
% 1.40/0.79 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 351023
% 1.40/0.79 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 25371
% 1.40/0.79 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 103
% 1.40/0.79 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3653
% 1.40/0.79 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.40/0.79 # BW rewrite match attempts : 44
% 1.40/0.79 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 1.40/0.79 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.40/0.79 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1.40/0.79 # Termbank termtop insertions : 112526
% 1.40/0.79 # Search garbage collected termcells : 17285
% 1.40/0.79
% 1.40/0.79 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.40/0.79 # User time : 0.273 s
% 1.40/0.79 # System time : 0.005 s
% 1.40/0.79 # Total time : 0.278 s
% 1.40/0.79 # Maximum resident set size: 5236 pages
% 1.40/0.79
% 1.40/0.79 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.40/0.79 # User time : 0.286 s
% 1.40/0.79 # System time : 0.005 s
% 1.40/0.79 # Total time : 0.292 s
% 1.40/0.79 # Maximum resident set size: 2244 pages
% 1.40/0.79 % E---3.1 exiting
% 1.40/0.79 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------