TSTP Solution File: SWB016+2 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : SWB016+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 19:02:28 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.18s 0.37s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SWB016+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.12/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jun 1 03:53:11 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.36 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.18/0.36 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.18/0.36 #
% 0.18/0.36 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/0.36 # Number of axioms: 27 Number of unprocessed: 25
% 0.18/0.36 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.18/0.36 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.18/0.36 # Hello from C++
% 0.18/0.36 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.18/0.36 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.18/0.36 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.18/0.36 # 25 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.18/0.36 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.18/0.36 # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.18/0.36 # Found 4 unit axioms.
% 0.18/0.36 # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.18/0.36 # 21 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.18/0.36 # 4 unit axiom clauses
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.18/0.36 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 0.18/0.37 # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.18/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.18/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.18/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.18/0.37 # There were 2 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.18/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.18/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.18/0.37 # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.18/0.37 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.37 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.37 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.18/0.37
% 0.18/0.37 # End clausification derivation
% 0.18/0.37 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.18/0.37 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (ip(uri_owl_equivalentClass))).
% 0.18/0.37 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (iext(uri_rdfs_domain,uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_rdfs_Class))).
% 0.18/0.37 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (iext(uri_rdfs_domain,uri_rdfs_domain,uri_rdf_Property))).
% 0.18/0.37 cnf(i_0_27, negated_conjecture, (~iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,uri_owl_equivalentClass,uri_rdfs_subClassOf))).
% 0.18/0.37 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (ip(X1)|~iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,uri_rdf_Property))).
% 0.18/0.37 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,uri_rdf_Property)|~ip(X1))).
% 0.18/0.37 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (ip(X1)|~iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X2,X1))).
% 0.18/0.37 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (ip(X1)|~iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X1,X2))).
% 0.18/0.37 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (ic(X1)|~iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X2,X1))).
% 0.18/0.37 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (ic(X1)|~iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X1,X2))).
% 0.18/0.37 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (ic(X1)|~iext(uri_owl_equivalentClass,X2,X1))).
% 0.18/0.37 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (ic(X1)|~iext(uri_owl_equivalentClass,X1,X2))).
% 0.18/0.37 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,X2)|~icext(X2,X1))).
% 0.18/0.37 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (icext(X1,X2)|~iext(uri_rdf_type,X2,X1))).
% 0.18/0.37 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (icext(X1,esk1_2(X1,X2))|iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X1,X2)|~ic(X2)|~ic(X1))).
% 0.18/0.37 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (icext(X1,X2)|~icext(X3,X2)|~iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X3,X1))).
% 0.18/0.37 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (icext(X1,X2)|~icext(X3,X2)|~iext(uri_owl_equivalentClass,X1,X3))).
% 0.18/0.37 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (icext(X1,X2)|~icext(X3,X2)|~iext(uri_owl_equivalentClass,X3,X1))).
% 0.18/0.37 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X1,X2)|~ic(X1)|~ic(X2)|~icext(X2,esk1_2(X1,X2)))).
% 0.18/0.37 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (icext(X1,X2)|~iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X3,X1)|~iext(X3,X2,X4))).
% 0.18/0.37 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (iext(X1,X2,X3)|~iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X4,X1)|~iext(X4,X2,X3))).
% 0.18/0.37 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X1,X2)|~ip(X1)|~ip(X2)|~iext(X2,esk2_2(X1,X2),esk3_2(X1,X2)))).
% 0.18/0.37 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (iext(uri_owl_equivalentClass,X1,X2)|~ic(X2)|~ic(X1)|~icext(X2,esk4_2(X1,X2))|~icext(X1,esk4_2(X1,X2)))).
% 0.18/0.37 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (iext(X1,esk2_2(X1,X2),esk3_2(X1,X2))|iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X1,X2)|~ip(X2)|~ip(X1))).
% 0.18/0.37 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (icext(X1,esk4_2(X1,X2))|icext(X2,esk4_2(X1,X2))|iext(uri_owl_equivalentClass,X1,X2)|~ic(X2)|~ic(X1))).
% 0.18/0.37 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.18/0.37 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.18/0.37 # Found 6 steps
% 0.18/0.37 cnf(i_0_27, negated_conjecture, (~iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,uri_owl_equivalentClass,uri_rdfs_subClassOf)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.18/0.37 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (~iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,uri_owl_equivalentClass,uri_rdfs_subClassOf)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_17])).
% 0.18/0.37 cnf(i_0_84, plain, (~ip(uri_owl_equivalentClass)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_8])).
% 0.18/0.37 cnf(i_0_81, plain, (iext(uri_owl_equivalentClass,esk2_2(uri_owl_equivalentClass,uri_rdfs_subClassOf),esk3_2(uri_owl_equivalentClass,uri_rdfs_subClassOf))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_9])).
% 0.18/0.37 cnf(i_0_83, plain, (~ip(uri_rdfs_subClassOf)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_83, ...])).
% 0.18/0.37 cnf(i_0_102, plain, (ic(esk3_2(uri_owl_equivalentClass,uri_rdfs_subClassOf))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_102, ...])).
% 0.18/0.37 # End printing tableau
% 0.18/0.37 # SZS output end
% 0.18/0.37 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.18/0.37 # Returning from population with 3 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.18/0.37 # We now have 3 tableaux to operate on
% 0.18/0.37 # Found closed tableau during pool population.
% 0.18/0.37 # Proof search is over...
% 0.18/0.37 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------