TSTP Solution File: SWB015+2 by Etableau---0.67

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : SWB015+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 19:02:27 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.36s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    9 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   14 (   4 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   11 (   6   ~;   3   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   1 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    7 (   0 sgn   4   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(testcase_conclusion_fullish_015_Reflective_Tautologies_I,conjecture,
    iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_owl_sameAs,uri_owl_sameAs),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_conclusion_fullish_015_Reflective_Tautologies_I) ).

fof(owl_eqdis_sameas,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X2)
    <=> X1 = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',owl_eqdis_sameas) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_owl_sameAs,uri_owl_sameAs),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[testcase_conclusion_fullish_015_Reflective_Tautologies_I]) ).

fof(c_0_3,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X3,X4)
        | X3 = X4 )
      & ( X3 != X4
        | iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X3,X4) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_eqdis_sameas])]) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_owl_sameAs,uri_owl_sameAs),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    ( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X2)
    | X1 != X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_owl_sameAs,uri_owl_sameAs),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X1),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : SWB015+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jun  1 00:48:26 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.36  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.36  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.12/0.36  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.12/0.36  #
% 0.12/0.36  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  # Proof found!
% 0.12/0.36  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.12/0.36  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.36  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------