TSTP Solution File: SWB009+2 by CSE---1.6

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.6
% Problem  : SWB009+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 20:01:09 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.64s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SWB009+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Sun Aug 27 07:18:53 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.57  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.64  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.64  % File        :CSE---1.6
% 0.20/0.64  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.64  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.20/0.64  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.20/0.64  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.20/0.64  
% 0.20/0.64  % Result      :Theorem 0.010000s
% 0.20/0.64  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.010000s
% 0.20/0.64  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.64  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.64  % File     : SWB009+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.20/0.64  % Domain   : Semantic Web
% 0.20/0.64  % Problem  : Existential Restriction Entailments
% 0.20/0.64  % Version  : [Sch11] axioms : Reduced > Incomplete.
% 0.20/0.64  % English  :
% 0.20/0.64  
% 0.20/0.64  % Refs     : [Sch11] Schneider, M. (2011), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.20/0.64  % Source   : [Sch11]
% 0.20/0.64  % Names    : 009_Existential_Restriction_Entailments [Sch11]
% 0.20/0.64  
% 0.20/0.64  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.20/0.64  % Rating   : 0.00 v7.5.0, 0.05 v7.4.0, 0.00 v7.0.0, 0.07 v6.3.0, 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.08 v6.0.0, 0.00 v5.5.0, 0.04 v5.3.0, 0.13 v5.2.0
% 0.20/0.64  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    4 (   0 unt;   0 def)
% 0.20/0.64  %            Number of atoms       :   15 (   0 equ)
% 0.20/0.64  %            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   3 avg)
% 0.20/0.64  %            Number of connectives :   11 (   0   ~;   0   |;   8   &)
% 0.20/0.64  %                                         (   2 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.20/0.64  %            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   6 avg)
% 0.20/0.64  %            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
% 0.20/0.64  %            Number of predicates  :    2 (   2 usr;   0 prp; 2-3 aty)
% 0.20/0.64  %            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   9 con; 0-0 aty)
% 0.20/0.64  %            Number of variables   :    9 (   6   !;   3   ?)
% 0.20/0.64  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.20/0.64  
% 0.20/0.64  % Comments :
% 0.20/0.64  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.64  fof(rdfs_cext_def,axiom,
% 0.20/0.64      ! [X,C] :
% 0.20/0.64        ( iext(uri_rdf_type,X,C)
% 0.20/0.64      <=> icext(C,X) ) ).
% 0.20/0.64  
% 0.20/0.64  fof(owl_restrict_somevaluesfrom,axiom,
% 0.20/0.64      ! [Z,P,C] :
% 0.20/0.64        ( ( iext(uri_owl_someValuesFrom,Z,C)
% 0.20/0.64          & iext(uri_owl_onProperty,Z,P) )
% 0.20/0.64       => ! [X] :
% 0.20/0.64            ( icext(Z,X)
% 0.20/0.64          <=> ? [Y] :
% 0.20/0.64                ( iext(P,X,Y)
% 0.20/0.64                & icext(C,Y) ) ) ) ).
% 0.20/0.64  
% 0.20/0.64  fof(testcase_conclusion_fullish_009_Existential_Restriction_Entailments,conjecture,
% 0.20/0.64      ? [BNODE_x] :
% 0.20/0.64        ( iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,BNODE_x)
% 0.20/0.64        & iext(uri_rdf_type,BNODE_x,uri_ex_c) ) ).
% 0.20/0.64  
% 0.20/0.64  fof(testcase_premise_fullish_009_Existential_Restriction_Entailments,axiom,
% 0.20/0.64      ? [BNODE_z] :
% 0.20/0.64        ( iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p,uri_owl_ObjectProperty)
% 0.20/0.64        & iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_c,uri_owl_Class)
% 0.20/0.64        & iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_s,BNODE_z)
% 0.20/0.64        & iext(uri_rdf_type,BNODE_z,uri_owl_Restriction)
% 0.20/0.64        & iext(uri_owl_onProperty,BNODE_z,uri_ex_p)
% 0.20/0.64        & iext(uri_owl_someValuesFrom,BNODE_z,uri_ex_c) ) ).
% 0.20/0.64  
% 0.20/0.64  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.64  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.64  % Proof found
% 0.20/0.64  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.64  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.64  %ClaNum:12(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.20/0.64  %VarNum:44(SingletonVarNum:18)
% 0.20/0.64  %MaxLitNum:5
% 0.20/0.64  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.20/0.64  %SharedTerms:16
% 0.20/0.64  %goalClause: 9
% 0.20/0.64  [1]P1(a1,a2,a6)
% 0.20/0.64  [2]P1(a1,a7,a3)
% 0.20/0.64  [3]P1(a1,a5,a8)
% 0.20/0.64  [4]P1(a1,a3,a9)
% 0.20/0.64  [5]P1(a10,a3,a5)
% 0.20/0.64  [6]P1(a11,a3,a2)
% 0.20/0.64  [9]~P1(a2,a7,x91)+~P1(a1,x91,a5)
% 0.20/0.64  [7]~P2(x72,x71)+P1(a1,x71,x72)
% 0.20/0.64  [8]P2(x81,x82)+~P1(a1,x82,x81)
% 0.20/0.64  [11]~P2(x112,x114)+~P1(a10,x112,x111)+~P1(a11,x112,x113)+P2(x111,f4(x112,x113,x111,x114))
% 0.20/0.64  [12]~P2(x123,x122)+~P1(a10,x123,x124)+~P1(a11,x123,x121)+P1(x121,x122,f4(x123,x121,x124,x122))
% 0.20/0.64  [10]P2(x101,x102)+~P1(x105,x102,x104)+~P2(x103,x104)+~P1(a10,x101,x103)+~P1(a11,x101,x105)
% 0.20/0.64  %EqnAxiom
% 0.20/0.64  
% 0.20/0.64  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.65  cnf(17,plain,
% 0.20/0.65     (~P2(a3,x171)+P2(a5,f4(a3,a2,a5,x171))),
% 0.20/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[5,6,11])).
% 0.20/0.65  cnf(25,plain,
% 0.20/0.65     (P1(a1,f4(a3,a2,a5,x251),a5)+~P2(a3,x251)),
% 0.20/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[7,17])).
% 0.20/0.65  cnf(27,plain,
% 0.20/0.65     (~P2(a3,x271)+~P1(a2,a7,f4(a3,a2,a5,x271))),
% 0.20/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[9,25])).
% 0.20/0.65  cnf(32,plain,
% 0.20/0.65     ($false),
% 0.20/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[5,2,6,8,12,27]),
% 0.20/0.65     ['proof']).
% 0.20/0.65  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.65  % Total time :0.010000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------