TSTP Solution File: SWB008+3 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWB008+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 19:20:33 EDT 2022
% Result : Timeout 300.04s 300.72s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14 % Problem : SWB008+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Wed Jun 1 05:10:21 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.81/1.03 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.81/1.03 The process was started by sandbox on n024.cluster.edu,
% 0.81/1.03 Wed Jun 1 05:10:21 2022
% 0.81/1.03 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 22954.
% 0.81/1.03
% 0.81/1.03 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.81/1.03 set(auto).
% 0.81/1.03 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.81/1.03 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.81/1.03 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.81/1.03 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.81/1.03 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.81/1.03 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.81/1.03 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.81/1.03 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.81/1.03 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.81/1.03 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.81/1.03 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.81/1.03 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.81/1.03 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.81/1.03 clear(print_given).
% 0.81/1.03
% 0.81/1.03 formula_list(usable).
% 0.81/1.03
% 0.81/1.03 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=15.
% 0.81/1.03
% 0.81/1.03 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.81/1.03 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.81/1.03 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.81/1.03
% 0.81/1.03 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.81/1.03 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.81/1.03 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.81/1.03
% 0.81/1.03 ------------> process usable:
% 0.81/1.03 Following clause subsumed by 1 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_owl_complementOf,A,B)|ic(A).
% 0.81/1.03 Following clause subsumed by 2 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_owl_complementOf,A,B)|ic(B).
% 0.81/1.03 Following clause subsumed by 97 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdf_type,A,uri_rdf_Property)|ip(A).
% 0.81/1.03 Following clause subsumed by 96 during input processing: 0 [] {-} iext(uri_rdf_type,A,uri_rdf_Property)| -ip(A).
% 0.81/1.03 Following clause subsumed by 120 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdfs_domain,A,B)| -iext(A,C,D)|icext(B,C).
% 0.81/1.03 Following clause subsumed by 125 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdfs_range,A,B)| -iext(A,C,D)|icext(B,D).
% 0.81/1.03 Following clause subsumed by 128 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,A,B)|ic(A).
% 0.81/1.03 Following clause subsumed by 129 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,A,B)|ic(B).
% 0.81/1.03 Following clause subsumed by 130 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,A,B)| -icext(A,C)|icext(B,C).
% 0.81/1.03 Following clause subsumed by 133 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,A,B)|ip(A).
% 0.81/1.03 Following clause subsumed by 134 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,A,B)|ip(B).
% 0.81/1.03 Following clause subsumed by 135 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,A,B)| -iext(A,C,D)|iext(B,C,D).
% 0.81/1.03 Following clause subsumed by 103 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -lv(A)|ir(A).
% 0.81/1.03 110 back subsumes 25.
% 0.81/1.03 110 back subsumes 16.
% 0.81/1.03 110 back subsumes 10.
% 0.81/1.03 110 back subsumes 5.
% 0.81/1.03 116 back subsumes 55.
% 0.81/1.03 116 back subsumes 46.
% 0.81/1.03 116 back subsumes 40.
% 0.81/1.03 116 back subsumes 37.
% 0.81/1.03 174 back subsumes 171.
% 0.81/1.03 204 back subsumes 194.
% 0.81/1.03 212 back subsumes 205.
% 0.81/1.03 212 back subsumes 195.
% 0.81/1.03 231 back subsumes 228.
% 0.81/1.03 259 back subsumes 249.
% 0.81/1.03 267 back subsumes 260.
% 0.81/1.03 267 back subsumes 250.
% 0.81/1.03 324 back subsumes 301.
% 0.81/1.03 332 back subsumes 312.
% 0.81/1.03 339 back subsumes 295.
% 0.81/1.03 427 back subsumes 404.
% 0.81/1.03 435 back subsumes 415.
% 0.81/1.03 442 back subsumes 398.
% 0.81/1.03 476 back subsumes 462.
% 0.81/1.03 480 back subsumes 467.
% 0.81/1.03 485 back subsumes 456.
% 0.81/1.03 562 back subsumes 548.
% 0.81/1.03 566 back subsumes 553.
% 0.81/1.03 571 back subsumes 542.
% 0.81/1.03
% 0.81/1.03 ------------> process sos:
% 0.81/1.03 Following clause subsumed by 607 during input processing: 0 [] {-} iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_rdf_type,uri_rdf_Property).
% 0.81/1.03 Following clause subsumed by 645 during input processing: 0 [] {-} iext(uri_rdfs_range,uri_rdf_predicate,uri_rdfs_Resource).
% 0.81/1.03 657 back subsumes 590.
% 0.81/1.03 657 back subsumes 154.
% 0.81/1.03 657 back subsumes 109.
% 0.81/1.03 657 back subsumes 103.
% 0.81/1.03 657 back subsumes 100.
% 0.81/1.03 657 back subsumes 99.
% 0.81/1.03 657 back subsumes 95.
% 0.81/1.03 657 back subsumes 94.
% 0.81/1.03 657 back subsumes 93.
% 0.81/1.03 657 back subsumes 83.
% 0.81/1.03 657 back subsumes 79.
% 0.81/1.03 657 back subsumes 78.
% 0.81/1.03 657 back subsumes 71.
% 0.81/1.03 657 back subsumes 70.
% 0.81/1.03 657 back subsumes 68.
% 0.81/1.03 657 back subsumes 8.
% 0.81/1.03 657 back subsumes 6.
% 0.81/1.03
% 0.81/1.03 ======= end of input processing =======
% 3.45/3.66
% 3.45/3.66 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.45/3.66
% 3.45/3.66
% 3.45/3.66 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 3.45/3.66
% 3.45/3.66
% 3.45/3.66
% 3.45/3.66 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 3.45/3.66
% 3.45/3.66 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 3.45/3.66 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 3.45/3.66 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 3.45/3.66 number of clauses in intial UL: 543
% 3.45/3.66 number of clauses initially in problem: 616
% 3.45/3.66 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 88
% 3.45/3.66 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 74
% 3.45/3.66 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 3.45/3.66 absolute distinct symbol count: 82
% 3.45/3.66 distinct predicate count: 11
% 3.45/3.66 distinct function count: 18
% 3.45/3.66 distinct constant count: 53
% 3.45/3.66
% 3.45/3.66 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 3.45/3.66
% 3.45/3.66
% 3.45/3.66
% 3.45/3.66 =========== start of search ===========
% 3.91/4.09
% 3.91/4.09
% 3.91/4.09 Changing weight limit from 60 to 27.
% 3.91/4.09
% 3.91/4.09 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 3.91/4.09
% 3.91/4.09
% 3.91/4.09 Resetting weight limit to 27 after 495 givens.
% 3.91/4.09
% 3.99/4.19
% 3.99/4.19
% 3.99/4.19 Changing weight limit from 27 to 22.
% 3.99/4.19
% 3.99/4.19 Resetting weight limit to 22 after 500 givens.
% 3.99/4.19
% 4.21/4.41
% 4.21/4.41
% 4.21/4.41 Changing weight limit from 22 to 20.
% 4.21/4.41
% 4.21/4.41 Resetting weight limit to 20 after 530 givens.
% 4.21/4.41
% 4.38/4.63
% 4.38/4.63
% 4.38/4.63 Changing weight limit from 20 to 19.
% 4.38/4.63
% 4.38/4.63 Resetting weight limit to 19 after 555 givens.
% 4.38/4.63
% 4.79/4.97
% 4.79/4.97
% 4.79/4.97 Changing weight limit from 19 to 18.
% 4.79/4.97
% 4.79/4.97 Resetting weight limit to 18 after 610 givens.
% 4.79/4.97
% 4.79/5.01
% 4.79/5.01
% 4.79/5.01 Changing weight limit from 18 to 17.
% 4.79/5.01
% 4.79/5.01 Resetting weight limit to 17 after 625 givens.
% 4.79/5.01
% 6.64/6.83
% 6.64/6.83
% 6.64/6.83 Changing weight limit from 17 to 16.
% 6.64/6.83
% 6.64/6.83 Resetting weight limit to 16 after 1050 givens.
% 6.64/6.83
% 6.80/6.98
% 6.80/6.98
% 6.80/6.98 Changing weight limit from 16 to 15.
% 6.80/6.98
% 6.80/6.98 Resetting weight limit to 15 after 1075 givens.
% 6.80/6.98
% 7.71/7.89
% 7.71/7.89
% 7.71/7.89 Changing weight limit from 15 to 14.
% 7.71/7.89
% 7.71/7.89 Resetting weight limit to 14 after 1205 givens.
% 7.71/7.89
% 8.30/8.50
% 8.30/8.50
% 8.30/8.50 Changing weight limit from 14 to 13.
% 8.30/8.50
% 8.30/8.50 Resetting weight limit to 13 after 1300 givens.
% 8.30/8.50
% 9.75/9.97
% 9.75/9.97
% 9.75/9.97 Changing weight limit from 13 to 12.
% 9.75/9.97
% 9.75/9.97 Resetting weight limit to 12 after 1415 givens.
% 9.75/9.97
% 58.07/58.27
% 58.07/58.27
% 58.07/58.27 Changing weight limit from 12 to 11.
% 58.07/58.27
% 58.07/58.27 Resetting weight limit to 11 after 4525 givens.
% 58.07/58.27
% 70.08/70.31
% 70.08/70.31
% 70.08/70.31 Changing weight limit from 11 to 10.
% 70.08/70.31
% 70.08/70.31 Resetting weight limit to 10 after 5230 givens.
% 70.08/70.31
% 300.04/300.72 Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------