TSTP Solution File: SWB008+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWB008+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 19:01:56 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.29s 3.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.29s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 22 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 57 ( 10 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 15 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 56 ( 21 ~; 20 |; 11 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 13 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 8 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 31 ( 5 sgn 21 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(rdfs_cext_def,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X4,X5)
<=> icext(X5,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',rdfs_cext_def) ).
fof(owl_char_inversefunctional,axiom,
! [X2] :
( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X2)
<=> ( ip(X2)
& ! [X37,X38,X7] :
( ( iext(X2,X37,X7)
& iext(X2,X38,X7) )
=> X37 = X38 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_char_inversefunctional) ).
fof(testcase_premise_fullish_008_Inverse_Functional_Data_Properties,axiom,
( iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_owl_DatatypeProperty)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty)
& iext(uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_ex_bob,literal_plain(dat_str_xyz))
& iext(uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_ex_robert,literal_plain(dat_str_xyz)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',testcase_premise_fullish_008_Inverse_Functional_Data_Properties) ).
fof(testcase_conclusion_fullish_008_Inverse_Functional_Data_Properties,conjecture,
iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_bob,uri_ex_robert),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',testcase_conclusion_fullish_008_Inverse_Functional_Data_Properties) ).
fof(owl_eqdis_sameas,axiom,
! [X4,X7] :
( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X4,X7)
<=> X4 = X7 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_eqdis_sameas) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X6,X7,X6,X7] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X6,X7)
| icext(X7,X6) )
& ( ~ icext(X7,X6)
| iext(uri_rdf_type,X6,X7) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdfs_cext_def])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X39,X40,X41,X42,X39] :
( ( ip(X39)
| ~ icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X39) )
& ( ~ iext(X39,X40,X42)
| ~ iext(X39,X41,X42)
| X40 = X41
| ~ icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X39) )
& ( iext(X39,esk166_1(X39),esk168_1(X39))
| ~ ip(X39)
| icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X39) )
& ( iext(X39,esk167_1(X39),esk168_1(X39))
| ~ ip(X39)
| icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X39) )
& ( esk166_1(X39) != esk167_1(X39)
| ~ ip(X39)
| icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X39) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_char_inversefunctional])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( icext(X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_008_Inverse_Functional_Data_Properties]) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_bob,uri_ex_robert),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[testcase_conclusion_fullish_008_Inverse_Functional_Data_Properties]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( X2 = X3
| ~ icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1)
| ~ iext(X1,X3,X4)
| ~ iext(X1,X2,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
iext(uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_ex_robert,literal_plain(dat_str_xyz)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_008_Inverse_Functional_Data_Properties]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X8,X9,X8,X9] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X8,X9)
| X8 = X9 )
& ( X8 != X9
| iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X8,X9) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_eqdis_sameas])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_bob,uri_ex_robert),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( X1 = uri_ex_robert
| ~ iext(uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,X1,literal_plain(dat_str_xyz)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
iext(uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_ex_bob,literal_plain(dat_str_xyz)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_008_Inverse_Functional_Data_Properties]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X2)
| X1 != X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_bob,uri_ex_robert),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
uri_ex_robert = uri_ex_bob,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X1),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWB008+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 1 07:53:33 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.29/3.46 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.29/3.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.088 s
% 0.29/3.46
% 0.29/3.46 # Proof found!
% 0.29/3.46 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.29/3.46 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.29/3.46 # Proof object total steps : 22
% 0.29/3.46 # Proof object clause steps : 12
% 0.29/3.46 # Proof object formula steps : 10
% 0.29/3.46 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.29/3.46 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.29/3.46 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.29/3.46 # Proof object initial clauses used : 7
% 0.29/3.46 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 0.29/3.46 # Proof object generating inferences : 3
% 0.29/3.46 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 6
% 0.29/3.46 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.29/3.46 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.29/3.46 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.29/3.46 # Initial clauses : 1271
% 0.29/3.46 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 111
% 0.29/3.46 # Initial clauses in saturation : 1160
% 0.29/3.46 # Processed clauses : 4870
% 0.29/3.46 # ...of these trivial : 189
% 0.29/3.46 # ...subsumed : 1281
% 0.29/3.46 # ...remaining for further processing : 3400
% 0.29/3.46 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 28
% 0.29/3.46 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 57483
% 0.29/3.46 # Backward-subsumed : 62
% 0.29/3.46 # Backward-rewritten : 119
% 0.29/3.46 # Generated clauses : 147704
% 0.29/3.46 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 145242
% 0.29/3.46 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 246
% 0.29/3.46 # Paramodulations : 147654
% 0.29/3.46 # Factorizations : 12
% 0.29/3.46 # Equation resolutions : 28
% 0.29/3.46 # Current number of processed clauses : 3199
% 0.29/3.46 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 391
% 0.29/3.46 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.29/3.46 # Negative unit clauses : 26
% 0.29/3.46 # Non-unit-clauses : 2782
% 0.29/3.46 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 77915
% 0.29/3.46 # ...number of literals in the above : 436187
% 0.29/3.46 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.29/3.46 # Current number of archived clauses : 182
% 0.29/3.46 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1252408
% 0.29/3.46 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 613153
% 0.29/3.46 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1194
% 0.29/3.46 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 38692
% 0.29/3.46 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.29/3.46 # BW rewrite match attempts : 22
% 0.29/3.46 # BW rewrite match successes : 8
% 0.29/3.46 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.29/3.46 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.29/3.46 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3375600
% 0.29/3.46
% 0.29/3.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.29/3.46 # User time : 2.300 s
% 0.29/3.46 # System time : 0.073 s
% 0.29/3.46 # Total time : 2.373 s
% 0.29/3.46 # Maximum resident set size: 133384 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------