TSTP Solution File: SWB008+1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SWB008+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:37:39 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 6.38s 1.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 6.38s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 22 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 59 ( 11 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 15 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 59 ( 22 ~; 22 |; 11 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 13 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 8 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 30 ( 0 sgn; 17 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(rdfs_cext_def,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X4,X5)
<=> icext(X5,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qTZ9hliwCB/E---3.1_9477.p',rdfs_cext_def) ).
fof(owl_char_inversefunctional,axiom,
! [X2] :
( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X2)
<=> ( ip(X2)
& ! [X37,X38,X7] :
( ( iext(X2,X37,X7)
& iext(X2,X38,X7) )
=> X37 = X38 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qTZ9hliwCB/E---3.1_9477.p',owl_char_inversefunctional) ).
fof(testcase_premise_fullish_008_Inverse_Functional_Data_Properties,axiom,
( iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_owl_DatatypeProperty)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty)
& iext(uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_ex_bob,literal_plain(dat_str_xyz))
& iext(uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_ex_robert,literal_plain(dat_str_xyz)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qTZ9hliwCB/E---3.1_9477.p',testcase_premise_fullish_008_Inverse_Functional_Data_Properties) ).
fof(owl_eqdis_sameas,axiom,
! [X4,X7] :
( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X4,X7)
<=> X4 = X7 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qTZ9hliwCB/E---3.1_9477.p',owl_eqdis_sameas) ).
fof(testcase_conclusion_fullish_008_Inverse_Functional_Data_Properties,conjecture,
iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_bob,uri_ex_robert),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qTZ9hliwCB/E---3.1_9477.p',testcase_conclusion_fullish_008_Inverse_Functional_Data_Properties) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X48,X49] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X48,X49)
| icext(X49,X48) )
& ( ~ icext(X49,X48)
| iext(uri_rdf_type,X48,X49) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdfs_cext_def])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X1038,X1039,X1040,X1041,X1042] :
( ( ip(X1038)
| ~ icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1038) )
& ( ~ iext(X1038,X1039,X1041)
| ~ iext(X1038,X1040,X1041)
| X1039 = X1040
| ~ icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1038) )
& ( iext(X1042,esk166_1(X1042),esk168_1(X1042))
| ~ ip(X1042)
| icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1042) )
& ( iext(X1042,esk167_1(X1042),esk168_1(X1042))
| ~ ip(X1042)
| icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1042) )
& ( esk166_1(X1042) != esk167_1(X1042)
| ~ ip(X1042)
| icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1042) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_char_inversefunctional])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( icext(X2,X1)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_008_Inverse_Functional_Data_Properties]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( X2 = X4
| ~ iext(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ iext(X1,X4,X3)
| ~ icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ iext(uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,X2,X3)
| ~ iext(uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,X1,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
iext(uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_ex_robert,literal_plain(dat_str_xyz)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_008_Inverse_Functional_Data_Properties]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X839,X840] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X839,X840)
| X839 = X840 )
& ( X839 != X840
| iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X839,X840) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_eqdis_sameas])]) ).
fof(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_bob,uri_ex_robert),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[testcase_conclusion_fullish_008_Inverse_Functional_Data_Properties])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( X1 = uri_ex_robert
| ~ iext(uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,X1,literal_plain(dat_str_xyz)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
iext(uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_ex_bob,literal_plain(dat_str_xyz)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_008_Inverse_Functional_Data_Properties]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X2)
| X1 != X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_bob,uri_ex_robert),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
uri_ex_robert = uri_ex_bob,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X1),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : SWB008+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 20:42:01 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.55 Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.55 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qTZ9hliwCB/E---3.1_9477.p
% 6.38/1.41 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 6.38/1.41 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 6.38/1.41 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 6.38/1.41 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 6.38/1.41 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 6.38/1.41 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 6.38/1.41 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 6.38/1.41 # G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with pid 9586 completed with status 0
% 6.38/1.41 # Result found by G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI
% 6.38/1.41 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 6.38/1.41 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 6.38/1.41 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 6.38/1.41 # No SInE strategy applied
% 6.38/1.41 # Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 6.38/1.41 # partial match(1): FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 6.38/1.41 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 6.38/1.41 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 487s (1) cores
% 6.38/1.41 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 91s (1) cores
% 6.38/1.41 # Starting SAT001_CA_MinMin_p005000_rr with 82s (1) cores
% 6.38/1.41 # G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with pid 9615 completed with status 0
% 6.38/1.41 # Result found by G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI
% 6.38/1.41 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 6.38/1.41 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 6.38/1.41 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 6.38/1.41 # No SInE strategy applied
% 6.38/1.41 # Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 6.38/1.41 # partial match(1): FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 6.38/1.41 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 6.38/1.41 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 487s (1) cores
% 6.38/1.41 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 91s (1) cores
% 6.38/1.41 # Preprocessing time : 0.012 s
% 6.38/1.41
% 6.38/1.41 # Proof found!
% 6.38/1.41 # SZS status Theorem
% 6.38/1.41 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.38/1.41 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 6.38/1.41 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 6.38/1.41 # Initial clauses : 1271
% 6.38/1.41 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 111
% 6.38/1.41 # Initial clauses in saturation : 1160
% 6.38/1.41 # Processed clauses : 9384
% 6.38/1.41 # ...of these trivial : 1478
% 6.38/1.41 # ...subsumed : 3072
% 6.38/1.41 # ...remaining for further processing : 4834
% 6.38/1.41 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 16
% 6.38/1.41 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 6.38/1.41 # Backward-subsumed : 33
% 6.38/1.41 # Backward-rewritten : 8
% 6.38/1.41 # Generated clauses : 25679
% 6.38/1.41 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 19767
% 6.38/1.41 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 6.38/1.41 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 26
% 6.38/1.41 # Paramodulations : 25661
% 6.38/1.41 # Factorizations : 2
% 6.38/1.41 # NegExts : 0
% 6.38/1.41 # Equation resolutions : 16
% 6.38/1.41 # Total rewrite steps : 19443
% 6.38/1.41 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 6.38/1.41 # Propositional check models : 0
% 6.38/1.41 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 6.38/1.41 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 6.38/1.41 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 6.38/1.41 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 6.38/1.41 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 6.38/1.41 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 6.38/1.41 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 6.38/1.41 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 6.38/1.41 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 6.38/1.41 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 6.38/1.41 # Current number of processed clauses : 4777
% 6.38/1.41 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2227
% 6.38/1.41 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 6.38/1.41 # Negative unit clauses : 7
% 6.38/1.41 # Non-unit-clauses : 2543
% 6.38/1.41 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 11529
% 6.38/1.41 # ...number of literals in the above : 56804
% 6.38/1.41 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 6.38/1.41 # Current number of archived clauses : 42
% 6.38/1.41 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1121471
% 6.38/1.41 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 453979
% 6.38/1.41 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3114
% 6.38/1.41 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 539608
% 6.38/1.41 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 6.38/1.41 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1495
% 6.38/1.41 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 6.38/1.41 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 6.38/1.41 # Condensation successes : 0
% 6.38/1.41 # Termbank termtop insertions : 446251
% 6.38/1.41
% 6.38/1.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 6.38/1.41 # User time : 0.790 s
% 6.38/1.41 # System time : 0.018 s
% 6.38/1.41 # Total time : 0.808 s
% 6.38/1.41 # Maximum resident set size: 5744 pages
% 6.38/1.41
% 6.38/1.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 6.38/1.41 # User time : 2.231 s
% 6.38/1.41 # System time : 0.078 s
% 6.38/1.41 # Total time : 2.309 s
% 6.38/1.41 # Maximum resident set size: 2236 pages
% 6.38/1.41 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------