TSTP Solution File: SWB007+2 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem : SWB007+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:37:07 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.21s 0.50s
% Output : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 20 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 40 ( 7 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 35 ( 15 ~; 10 |; 9 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 9 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 8 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f24,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f23,f21]) ).
fof(f21,plain,
iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c,uri_ex_c2),
inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f11,f16]) ).
fof(f16,plain,
uri_ex_c2 = uri_ex_c1,
inference(resolution,[],[f8,f10]) ).
fof(f10,plain,
iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_c1,uri_ex_c2),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
( iext(uri_rdfs_range,uri_ex_p,uri_ex_c1)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c1)
& iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c,uri_ex_c1)
& iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_c1,uri_ex_c2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_premise_fullish_007_Equal_Classes) ).
fof(f8,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X0)
| X0 = X1 ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).
fof(f7,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X0)
| X0 != X1 )
& ( X0 = X1
| ~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X0) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f6]) ).
fof(f6,plain,
! [X1,X0] :
( ( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X0,X1)
| X0 != X1 )
& ( X0 = X1
| ~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X0,X1) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
! [X1,X0] :
( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X0,X1)
<=> X0 = X1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',owl_eqdis_sameas) ).
fof(f11,plain,
iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c,uri_ex_c1),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).
fof(f23,plain,
~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c,uri_ex_c2),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f22,f18]) ).
fof(f18,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c2),
inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f12,f16]) ).
fof(f12,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c1),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).
fof(f22,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c2)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c,uri_ex_c2) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f19,f14]) ).
fof(f14,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_rdfs_range,uri_ex_p,uri_ex_c2)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c,uri_ex_c2)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).
fof(f5,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c,uri_ex_c2)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c2)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_range,uri_ex_p,uri_ex_c2) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).
fof(f3,negated_conjecture,
~ ( iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c2)
& iext(uri_rdfs_range,uri_ex_p,uri_ex_c2)
& iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c,uri_ex_c2) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f2]) ).
fof(f2,conjecture,
( iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c2)
& iext(uri_rdfs_range,uri_ex_p,uri_ex_c2)
& iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c,uri_ex_c2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_conclusion_fullish_007_Equal_Classes) ).
fof(f19,plain,
iext(uri_rdfs_range,uri_ex_p,uri_ex_c2),
inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f13,f16]) ).
fof(f13,plain,
iext(uri_rdfs_range,uri_ex_p,uri_ex_c1),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : SWB007+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 17:27:18 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.48 % (25337)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/51Mi)
% 0.21/0.49 % (25357)ott+11_1:1_drc=off:nwc=5.0:slsq=on:slsqc=1:spb=goal_then_units:to=lpo:i=467:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/467Mi)
% 0.21/0.49 % (25349)ott+11_2:3_av=off:fde=unused:nwc=5.0:tgt=ground:i=75:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/75Mi)
% 0.21/0.49 % (25345)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/100Mi)
% 0.21/0.49 % (25349)First to succeed.
% 0.21/0.50 % (25362)ott+33_1:4_s2a=on:tgt=ground:i=439:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/439Mi)
% 0.21/0.50 % (25345)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.21/0.50 % (25349)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.21/0.50 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.50 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.50 % (25349)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 % (25349)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.21/0.50 % (25349)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.21/0.50 % (25349)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 % (25349)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.21/0.50 % (25349)Time elapsed: 0.081 s
% 0.21/0.50 % (25349)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.21/0.50 % (25349)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 % (25349)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 % (25332)Success in time 0.145 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------