TSTP Solution File: SWB006+3 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWB006+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 19:20:33 EDT 2022
% Result : Timeout 300.04s 300.24s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : SWB006+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jun 1 06:27:55 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.79/0.99 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.79/0.99 The process was started by sandbox2 on n019.cluster.edu,
% 0.79/0.99 Wed Jun 1 06:27:55 2022
% 0.79/0.99 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 23858.
% 0.79/0.99
% 0.79/0.99 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.79/0.99 set(auto).
% 0.79/0.99 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.79/0.99 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.79/0.99 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.79/0.99 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.79/0.99 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.79/0.99 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.79/0.99 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.79/0.99 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.79/0.99 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.79/0.99 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.79/0.99 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.79/0.99 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.79/0.99 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.79/0.99 clear(print_given).
% 0.79/0.99
% 0.79/0.99 formula_list(usable).
% 0.79/0.99
% 0.79/0.99 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=15.
% 0.79/0.99
% 0.79/0.99 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.79/0.99 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.79/0.99 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.79/0.99
% 0.79/0.99 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.79/0.99 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.79/0.99 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.79/0.99
% 0.79/0.99 ------------> process usable:
% 0.79/0.99 Following clause subsumed by 1 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_owl_complementOf,A,B)|ic(A).
% 0.79/0.99 Following clause subsumed by 2 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_owl_complementOf,A,B)|ic(B).
% 0.79/0.99 Following clause subsumed by 97 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdf_type,A,uri_rdf_Property)|ip(A).
% 0.79/0.99 Following clause subsumed by 96 during input processing: 0 [] {-} iext(uri_rdf_type,A,uri_rdf_Property)| -ip(A).
% 0.79/0.99 Following clause subsumed by 120 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdfs_domain,A,B)| -iext(A,C,D)|icext(B,C).
% 0.79/0.99 Following clause subsumed by 125 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdfs_range,A,B)| -iext(A,C,D)|icext(B,D).
% 0.79/0.99 Following clause subsumed by 128 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,A,B)|ic(A).
% 0.79/0.99 Following clause subsumed by 129 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,A,B)|ic(B).
% 0.79/0.99 Following clause subsumed by 130 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,A,B)| -icext(A,C)|icext(B,C).
% 0.79/0.99 Following clause subsumed by 133 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,A,B)|ip(A).
% 0.79/0.99 Following clause subsumed by 134 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,A,B)|ip(B).
% 0.79/0.99 Following clause subsumed by 135 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,A,B)| -iext(A,C,D)|iext(B,C,D).
% 0.79/0.99 Following clause subsumed by 103 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -lv(A)|ir(A).
% 0.79/0.99 110 back subsumes 25.
% 0.79/0.99 110 back subsumes 16.
% 0.79/0.99 110 back subsumes 10.
% 0.79/0.99 110 back subsumes 5.
% 0.79/0.99 116 back subsumes 55.
% 0.79/0.99 116 back subsumes 46.
% 0.79/0.99 116 back subsumes 40.
% 0.79/0.99 116 back subsumes 37.
% 0.79/0.99 174 back subsumes 171.
% 0.79/0.99 204 back subsumes 194.
% 0.79/0.99 212 back subsumes 205.
% 0.79/0.99 212 back subsumes 195.
% 0.79/0.99 231 back subsumes 228.
% 0.79/0.99 259 back subsumes 249.
% 0.79/0.99 267 back subsumes 260.
% 0.79/0.99 267 back subsumes 250.
% 0.79/0.99 324 back subsumes 301.
% 0.79/0.99 332 back subsumes 312.
% 0.79/0.99 339 back subsumes 295.
% 0.79/0.99 427 back subsumes 404.
% 0.79/0.99 435 back subsumes 415.
% 0.79/0.99 442 back subsumes 398.
% 0.79/0.99 476 back subsumes 462.
% 0.79/0.99 480 back subsumes 467.
% 0.79/0.99 485 back subsumes 456.
% 0.79/0.99 562 back subsumes 548.
% 0.79/0.99 566 back subsumes 553.
% 0.79/0.99 571 back subsumes 542.
% 0.79/0.99
% 0.79/0.99 ------------> process sos:
% 0.79/0.99 Following clause subsumed by 607 during input processing: 0 [] {-} iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_rdf_type,uri_rdf_Property).
% 0.79/0.99 Following clause subsumed by 645 during input processing: 0 [] {-} iext(uri_rdfs_range,uri_rdf_predicate,uri_rdfs_Resource).
% 0.79/0.99 657 back subsumes 590.
% 0.79/0.99 657 back subsumes 154.
% 0.79/0.99 657 back subsumes 109.
% 0.79/0.99 657 back subsumes 103.
% 0.79/0.99 657 back subsumes 100.
% 0.79/0.99 657 back subsumes 99.
% 0.79/0.99 657 back subsumes 95.
% 0.79/0.99 657 back subsumes 94.
% 0.79/0.99 657 back subsumes 93.
% 0.79/0.99 657 back subsumes 83.
% 0.79/0.99 657 back subsumes 79.
% 0.79/0.99 657 back subsumes 78.
% 0.79/0.99 657 back subsumes 71.
% 0.79/0.99 657 back subsumes 70.
% 0.79/0.99 657 back subsumes 68.
% 0.79/0.99 657 back subsumes 8.
% 0.79/0.99 657 back subsumes 6.
% 0.79/0.99
% 0.79/0.99 ======= end of input processing =======
% 3.34/3.53
% 3.34/3.53 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.34/3.53
% 3.34/3.53
% 3.34/3.53 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 3.34/3.53
% 3.34/3.53
% 3.34/3.53
% 3.34/3.53 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 3.34/3.53
% 3.34/3.53 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 3.34/3.53 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 3.34/3.53 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 3.34/3.53 number of clauses in intial UL: 543
% 3.34/3.53 number of clauses initially in problem: 615
% 3.34/3.53 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 88
% 3.34/3.53 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 75
% 3.34/3.53 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 3.34/3.53 absolute distinct symbol count: 81
% 3.34/3.53 distinct predicate count: 11
% 3.34/3.53 distinct function count: 18
% 3.34/3.53 distinct constant count: 52
% 3.34/3.53
% 3.34/3.53 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 3.34/3.53
% 3.34/3.53
% 3.34/3.53
% 3.34/3.53 =========== start of search ===========
% 3.78/3.99
% 3.78/3.99
% 3.78/3.99 Changing weight limit from 60 to 27.
% 3.78/3.99
% 3.78/3.99 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 3.78/3.99
% 3.78/3.99
% 3.78/3.99 Resetting weight limit to 27 after 475 givens.
% 3.78/3.99
% 3.88/4.08
% 3.88/4.08
% 3.88/4.08 Changing weight limit from 27 to 22.
% 3.88/4.08
% 3.88/4.08 Resetting weight limit to 22 after 480 givens.
% 3.88/4.08
% 4.15/4.37
% 4.15/4.37
% 4.15/4.37 Changing weight limit from 22 to 20.
% 4.15/4.37
% 4.15/4.37 Resetting weight limit to 20 after 525 givens.
% 4.15/4.37
% 4.37/4.58
% 4.37/4.58
% 4.37/4.58 Changing weight limit from 20 to 19.
% 4.37/4.58
% 4.37/4.58 Resetting weight limit to 19 after 550 givens.
% 4.37/4.58
% 4.67/4.89
% 4.67/4.89
% 4.67/4.89 Changing weight limit from 19 to 18.
% 4.67/4.89
% 4.67/4.89 Resetting weight limit to 18 after 635 givens.
% 4.67/4.89
% 4.67/4.93
% 4.67/4.93
% 4.67/4.93 Changing weight limit from 18 to 17.
% 4.67/4.93
% 4.67/4.93 Resetting weight limit to 17 after 650 givens.
% 4.67/4.93
% 6.06/6.26
% 6.06/6.26
% 6.06/6.26 Changing weight limit from 17 to 16.
% 6.06/6.26
% 6.06/6.26 Resetting weight limit to 16 after 995 givens.
% 6.06/6.26
% 7.18/7.37
% 7.18/7.37
% 7.18/7.37 Changing weight limit from 16 to 15.
% 7.18/7.37
% 7.18/7.37 Resetting weight limit to 15 after 1180 givens.
% 7.18/7.37
% 9.86/10.05
% 9.86/10.05
% 9.86/10.05 Changing weight limit from 15 to 14.
% 9.86/10.05
% 9.86/10.05 Resetting weight limit to 14 after 1395 givens.
% 9.86/10.05
% 10.20/10.41
% 10.20/10.41
% 10.20/10.41 Changing weight limit from 14 to 13.
% 10.20/10.41
% 10.20/10.41 Resetting weight limit to 13 after 1425 givens.
% 10.20/10.41
% 11.08/11.34
% 11.08/11.34
% 11.08/11.34 Changing weight limit from 13 to 12.
% 11.08/11.34
% 11.08/11.34 Resetting weight limit to 12 after 1630 givens.
% 11.08/11.34
% 57.06/57.24
% 57.06/57.24
% 57.06/57.24 Changing weight limit from 12 to 11.
% 57.06/57.24
% 57.06/57.24 Resetting weight limit to 11 after 5065 givens.
% 57.06/57.24
% 74.29/74.50
% 74.29/74.50
% 74.29/74.50 Changing weight limit from 11 to 10.
% 74.29/74.50
% 74.29/74.50 Resetting weight limit to 10 after 5705 givens.
% 74.29/74.50
% 300.04/300.24 Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------