TSTP Solution File: SWB006+2 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SWB006+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 20:01:06 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.62s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SWB006+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.16/0.34 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 06:46:17 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.57 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.20/0.62 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.62 % Transform :cnf
% 0.20/0.62 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.20/0.62 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.62 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62 % File : SWB006+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.20/0.62 % Domain : Semantic Web
% 0.20/0.62 % Problem : Literal Values represented by URIs and Blank Nodes
% 0.20/0.62 % Version : [Sch11] axioms : Reduced > Incomplete.
% 0.20/0.62 % English :
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 % Refs : [Sch11] Schneider, M. (2011), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.20/0.62 % Source : [Sch11]
% 0.20/0.62 % Names : 006_Literal_Values_represented_by_URIs_and_Blank_Nodes [Sch11]
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 % Status : Theorem
% 0.20/0.62 % Rating : 0.08 v8.1.0, 0.06 v7.4.0, 0.03 v7.1.0, 0.04 v7.0.0, 0.03 v6.4.0, 0.04 v6.2.0, 0.12 v6.1.0, 0.10 v6.0.0, 0.04 v5.3.0, 0.11 v5.2.0
% 0.20/0.62 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 3 ( 1 unt; 0 def)
% 0.20/0.62 % Number of atoms : 6 ( 1 equ)
% 0.20/0.62 % Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 2 avg)
% 0.20/0.62 % Number of connectives : 3 ( 0 ~; 0 |; 2 &)
% 0.20/0.62 % ( 1 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% 0.20/0.62 % Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% 0.20/0.62 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 0.20/0.62 % Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 0 prp; 2-3 aty)
% 0.20/0.62 % Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-1 aty)
% 0.20/0.62 % Number of variables : 3 ( 2 !; 1 ?)
% 0.20/0.62 % SPC : FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 % Comments :
% 0.20/0.62 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62 fof(owl_eqdis_sameas,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62 ! [X,Y] :
% 0.20/0.62 ( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X,Y)
% 0.20/0.62 <=> X = Y ) ).
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 fof(testcase_conclusion_fullish_006_Literal_Values_represented_by_URIs_and_Blank_Nodes,conjecture,
% 0.20/0.62 iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_u,uri_ex_w) ).
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 fof(testcase_premise_fullish_006_Literal_Values_represented_by_URIs_and_Blank_Nodes,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62 ? [BNODE_x] :
% 0.20/0.62 ( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_u,literal_plain(dat_str_abc))
% 0.20/0.62 & iext(uri_owl_sameAs,BNODE_x,literal_plain(dat_str_abc))
% 0.20/0.62 & iext(uri_owl_sameAs,BNODE_x,uri_ex_w) ) ).
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62 % Proof found
% 0.20/0.62 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.62 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.62 %ClaNum:13(EqnAxiom:7)
% 0.20/0.62 %VarNum:8(SingletonVarNum:4)
% 0.20/0.62 %MaxLitNum:2
% 0.20/0.62 %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.20/0.62 %SharedTerms:10
% 0.20/0.62 %goalClause: 11
% 0.20/0.62 %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.20/0.62 [8]P1(a1,a2,a4)
% 0.20/0.62 [11]~P1(a1,a5,a4)
% 0.20/0.62 [9]P1(a1,a5,f6(a3))
% 0.20/0.62 [10]P1(a1,a2,f6(a3))
% 0.20/0.62 [12]~E(x121,x122)+P1(a1,x121,x122)
% 0.20/0.62 [13]E(x131,x132)+~P1(a1,x131,x132)
% 0.20/0.62 %EqnAxiom
% 0.20/0.62 [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.20/0.62 [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.20/0.62 [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.20/0.62 [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f6(x41),f6(x42))
% 0.20/0.62 [5]P1(x52,x53,x54)+~E(x51,x52)+~P1(x51,x53,x54)
% 0.20/0.62 [6]P1(x63,x62,x64)+~E(x61,x62)+~P1(x63,x61,x64)
% 0.20/0.62 [7]P1(x73,x74,x72)+~E(x71,x72)+~P1(x73,x74,x71)
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.63 cnf(14,plain,
% 0.20/0.63 (E(a2,a4)),
% 0.20/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[8,13])).
% 0.20/0.63 cnf(16,plain,
% 0.20/0.63 (~E(f6(a3),a4)),
% 0.20/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[11,8,9,13,12,7])).
% 0.20/0.63 cnf(20,plain,
% 0.20/0.63 (E(f6(a2),f6(a4))),
% 0.20/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[11,8,9,13,12,7,6,3,2,4])).
% 0.20/0.63 cnf(29,plain,
% 0.20/0.63 (~E(a2,f6(a3))),
% 0.20/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[11,8,20,16,14,13,12,2,7,6])).
% 0.20/0.63 cnf(33,plain,
% 0.20/0.63 ($false),
% 0.20/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[10,29,13]),
% 0.20/0.63 ['proof']).
% 0.20/0.63 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.63 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------