TSTP Solution File: SWB006+1 by Twee---2.4.2

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem  : SWB006+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 20:12:43 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 95.22s 12.84s
% Output   : Proof 95.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SWB006+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 06:10:01 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 95.22/12.84  Command-line arguments: --no-flatten-goal
% 95.22/12.84  
% 95.22/12.84  % SZS status Theorem
% 95.22/12.84  
% 95.22/12.85  % SZS output start Proof
% 95.22/12.85  Take the following subset of the input axioms:
% 95.22/12.85    fof(owl_eqdis_sameas, axiom, ![X, Y]: (iext(uri_owl_sameAs, X, Y) <=> X=Y)).
% 95.22/12.85    fof(testcase_conclusion_fullish_006_Literal_Values_represented_by_URIs_and_Blank_Nodes, conjecture, iext(uri_owl_sameAs, uri_ex_u, uri_ex_w)).
% 95.22/12.85    fof(testcase_premise_fullish_006_Literal_Values_represented_by_URIs_and_Blank_Nodes, axiom, ?[BNODE_x]: (iext(uri_owl_sameAs, uri_ex_u, literal_plain(dat_str_abc)) & (iext(uri_owl_sameAs, BNODE_x, literal_plain(dat_str_abc)) & iext(uri_owl_sameAs, BNODE_x, uri_ex_w)))).
% 95.22/12.85  
% 95.22/12.85  Now clausify the problem and encode Horn clauses using encoding 3 of
% 95.22/12.85  http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~nicsma/papers/horn.pdf.
% 95.22/12.85  We repeatedly replace C & s=t => u=v by the two clauses:
% 95.22/12.85    fresh(y, y, x1...xn) = u
% 95.22/12.85    C => fresh(s, t, x1...xn) = v
% 95.22/12.85  where fresh is a fresh function symbol and x1..xn are the free
% 95.22/12.85  variables of u and v.
% 95.22/12.85  A predicate p(X) is encoded as p(X)=true (this is sound, because the
% 95.22/12.85  input problem has no model of domain size 1).
% 95.22/12.85  
% 95.22/12.85  The encoding turns the above axioms into the following unit equations and goals:
% 95.22/12.85  
% 95.22/12.85  Axiom 1 (owl_eqdis_sameas): iext(uri_owl_sameAs, X, X) = true2.
% 95.22/12.85  Axiom 2 (testcase_premise_fullish_006_Literal_Values_represented_by_URIs_and_Blank_Nodes_1): iext(uri_owl_sameAs, bnode_x, uri_ex_w) = true2.
% 95.22/12.85  Axiom 3 (owl_eqdis_sameas_1): fresh(X, X, Y, Z) = Z.
% 95.22/12.85  Axiom 4 (testcase_premise_fullish_006_Literal_Values_represented_by_URIs_and_Blank_Nodes): iext(uri_owl_sameAs, uri_ex_u, literal_plain(dat_str_abc)) = true2.
% 95.22/12.85  Axiom 5 (testcase_premise_fullish_006_Literal_Values_represented_by_URIs_and_Blank_Nodes_2): iext(uri_owl_sameAs, bnode_x, literal_plain(dat_str_abc)) = true2.
% 95.22/12.85  Axiom 6 (owl_eqdis_sameas_1): fresh(iext(uri_owl_sameAs, X, Y), true2, X, Y) = X.
% 95.22/12.85  
% 95.22/12.85  Goal 1 (testcase_conclusion_fullish_006_Literal_Values_represented_by_URIs_and_Blank_Nodes): iext(uri_owl_sameAs, uri_ex_u, uri_ex_w) = true2.
% 95.22/12.85  Proof:
% 95.22/12.85    iext(uri_owl_sameAs, uri_ex_u, uri_ex_w)
% 95.22/12.85  = { by axiom 6 (owl_eqdis_sameas_1) R->L }
% 95.22/12.85    iext(uri_owl_sameAs, uri_ex_u, fresh(iext(uri_owl_sameAs, uri_ex_w, literal_plain(dat_str_abc)), true2, uri_ex_w, literal_plain(dat_str_abc)))
% 95.22/12.85  = { by axiom 3 (owl_eqdis_sameas_1) R->L }
% 95.22/12.85    iext(uri_owl_sameAs, uri_ex_u, fresh(iext(uri_owl_sameAs, fresh(true2, true2, bnode_x, uri_ex_w), literal_plain(dat_str_abc)), true2, uri_ex_w, literal_plain(dat_str_abc)))
% 95.22/12.85  = { by axiom 2 (testcase_premise_fullish_006_Literal_Values_represented_by_URIs_and_Blank_Nodes_1) R->L }
% 95.22/12.85    iext(uri_owl_sameAs, uri_ex_u, fresh(iext(uri_owl_sameAs, fresh(iext(uri_owl_sameAs, bnode_x, uri_ex_w), true2, bnode_x, uri_ex_w), literal_plain(dat_str_abc)), true2, uri_ex_w, literal_plain(dat_str_abc)))
% 95.22/12.85  = { by axiom 6 (owl_eqdis_sameas_1) }
% 95.22/12.85    iext(uri_owl_sameAs, uri_ex_u, fresh(iext(uri_owl_sameAs, bnode_x, literal_plain(dat_str_abc)), true2, uri_ex_w, literal_plain(dat_str_abc)))
% 95.22/12.85  = { by axiom 5 (testcase_premise_fullish_006_Literal_Values_represented_by_URIs_and_Blank_Nodes_2) }
% 95.22/12.85    iext(uri_owl_sameAs, uri_ex_u, fresh(true2, true2, uri_ex_w, literal_plain(dat_str_abc)))
% 95.22/12.85  = { by axiom 3 (owl_eqdis_sameas_1) }
% 95.22/12.85    iext(uri_owl_sameAs, uri_ex_u, literal_plain(dat_str_abc))
% 95.22/12.85  = { by axiom 3 (owl_eqdis_sameas_1) R->L }
% 95.22/12.85    iext(uri_owl_sameAs, uri_ex_u, fresh(true2, true2, uri_ex_u, literal_plain(dat_str_abc)))
% 95.22/12.85  = { by axiom 4 (testcase_premise_fullish_006_Literal_Values_represented_by_URIs_and_Blank_Nodes) R->L }
% 95.22/12.85    iext(uri_owl_sameAs, uri_ex_u, fresh(iext(uri_owl_sameAs, uri_ex_u, literal_plain(dat_str_abc)), true2, uri_ex_u, literal_plain(dat_str_abc)))
% 95.22/12.85  = { by axiom 6 (owl_eqdis_sameas_1) }
% 95.22/12.85    iext(uri_owl_sameAs, uri_ex_u, uri_ex_u)
% 95.22/12.85  = { by axiom 1 (owl_eqdis_sameas) }
% 95.22/12.85    true2
% 95.22/12.85  % SZS output end Proof
% 95.22/12.85  
% 95.22/12.85  RESULT: Theorem (the conjecture is true).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------