TSTP Solution File: SWB003+4 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : SWB003+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:35:44 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.23s 0.54s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    7 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    7 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    3 (   3   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   1 sgn;   1   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(testcase_conclusion_fullish_003_Blank_Nodes_for_Literals,conjecture,
    ? [X11] : iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,X11),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.VOfklwa76R/E---3.1_3575.p',testcase_conclusion_fullish_003_Blank_Nodes_for_Literals) ).

fof(testcase_premise_fullish_003_Blank_Nodes_for_Literals,axiom,
    iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,literal_plain(dat_str_foo)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.VOfklwa76R/E---3.1_3575.p',testcase_premise_fullish_003_Blank_Nodes_for_Literals) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X11] : iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,X11),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[testcase_conclusion_fullish_003_Blank_Nodes_for_Literals]) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X12] : ~ iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,X12),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])]) ).

cnf(c_0_4,plain,
    iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,literal_plain(dat_str_foo)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_003_Blank_Nodes_for_Literals]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14  % Problem    : SWB003+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.08/0.16  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.16/0.37  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.37  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.16/0.37  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.37  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 20:26:53 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.38  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.23/0.52  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.52  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.VOfklwa76R/E---3.1_3575.p
% 0.23/0.54  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.23/0.54  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.54  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.54  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.54  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.54  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.54  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.54  # sh5l with pid 3656 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.54  # Result found by sh5l
% 0.23/0.54  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.54  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.54  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.54  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.54  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.54  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.54  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.23/0.54  # Search class: FHUNF-FFMM11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.54  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.54  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.54  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 3662 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.54  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.23/0.54  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.54  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.54  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.54  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.54  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.54  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.54  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.23/0.54  # Search class: FHUNF-FFMM11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.54  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.54  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.54  # Preprocessing time       : 0.004 s
% 0.23/0.54  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.23/0.54  
% 0.23/0.54  # Proof found!
% 0.23/0.54  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/0.54  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.54  # Parsed axioms                        : 82
% 0.23/0.54  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 23
% 0.23/0.54  # Initial clauses                      : 68
% 0.23/0.54  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 68
% 0.23/0.54  # Processed clauses                    : 3
% 0.23/0.54  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # ...remaining for further processing  : 2
% 0.23/0.54  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # Total rewrite steps                  : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.23/0.54  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.23/0.54  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.23/0.54  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.23/0.54  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.23/0.54  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.23/0.54  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.23/0.54  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.23/0.54  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.23/0.54  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.23/0.54  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.23/0.54  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.23/0.54  # Current number of processed clauses  : 2
% 0.23/0.54  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
% 0.23/0.54  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/0.54  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.23/0.54  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 65
% 0.23/0.54  # ...number of literals in the above   : 98
% 0.23/0.54  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 2305
% 0.23/0.54  
% 0.23/0.54  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.54  # User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.23/0.54  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.23/0.54  # Total time               : 0.009 s
% 0.23/0.54  # Maximum resident set size: 1920 pages
% 0.23/0.54  
% 0.23/0.54  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.54  # User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.23/0.54  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.23/0.54  # Total time               : 0.013 s
% 0.23/0.54  # Maximum resident set size: 1732 pages
% 0.23/0.54  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.23/0.55  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------