TSTP Solution File: SWB003+2 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem : SWB003+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:37:03 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.54s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 7 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 7 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 3 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 2 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f7,plain,
$false,
inference(resolution,[],[f6,f5]) ).
fof(f5,plain,
! [X0] : ~ iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).
fof(f4,plain,
! [X0] : ~ iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,X0),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).
fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X0] : iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,X0),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).
fof(f1,conjecture,
? [X0] : iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_conclusion_fullish_003_Blank_Nodes_for_Literals) ).
fof(f6,plain,
iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,literal_plain(dat_str_foo)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,literal_plain(dat_str_foo)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_premise_fullish_003_Blank_Nodes_for_Literals) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWB003+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 17:25:56 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.53 % (19905)dis+2_1:64_add=large:bce=on:bd=off:i=2:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.20/0.53 % (19912)ott+11_2:3_av=off:fde=unused:nwc=5.0:tgt=ground:i=75:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/75Mi)
% 0.20/0.53 % (19914)fmb+10_1:1_bce=on:i=59:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/59Mi)
% 0.20/0.53 % (19906)ott-1_1:6_av=off:cond=on:fsr=off:nwc=3.0:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.20/0.54 % (19906)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.54 TRYING [1]
% 0.20/0.54 % (19914)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.20/0.54 % (19906)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.54 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.54 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.54 % (19906)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.54 % (19906)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.54 % (19906)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.54 % (19906)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.54
% 0.20/0.54 % (19906)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.20/0.54 % (19906)Time elapsed: 0.087 s
% 0.20/0.54 % (19906)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.20/0.54 % (19906)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.54 % (19906)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.54 % (19896)Success in time 0.186 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------