TSTP Solution File: SWB003+2 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SWB003+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 18:58:11 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.66s 2.33s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.66s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    5 (   5 unt;   0 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    5 (   0 equ;   2 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    2 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_2,plain,
    iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,literal_plain(dat_str_foo)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-t773wjgw/input.p',i_0_2) ).

cnf(i_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-t773wjgw/input.p',i_0_1) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,literal_plain(dat_str_foo)),
    i_0_2 ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,X1),
    i_0_1 ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SWB003+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jun  1 09:38:08 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.66/2.33  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 7.66/2.33  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.66/2.33  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.66/2.33  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI
% 7.66/2.33  # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHPNS.
% 7.66/2.33  #
% 7.66/2.33  # Preprocessing time       : 0.013 s
% 7.66/2.33  
% 7.66/2.33  # Proof found!
% 7.66/2.33  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.66/2.33  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.66/2.33  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.66/2.33  
% 7.66/2.33  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.66/2.33  # User time                : 0.014 s
% 7.66/2.33  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 7.66/2.33  # Total time               : 0.018 s
% 7.66/2.33  # Maximum resident set size: 7116 pages
% 7.66/2.33  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------