TSTP Solution File: SWB002+3 by SnakeForV---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem  : SWB002+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:36:07 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.51s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (   3 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   25 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   20 (   8   ~;   3   |;   8   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   15 (   6   !;   9   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f153,plain,
    $false,
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f150,f149,f148]) ).

fof(f148,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ iext(uri_ex_q,X0,X1)
      | ~ iext(uri_ex_p,X1,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f145]) ).

fof(f145,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ iext(uri_ex_p,X1,X0)
      | ~ iext(uri_ex_q,X0,X1) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f144]) ).

fof(f144,plain,
    ! [X1,X0] :
      ( ~ iext(uri_ex_p,X0,X1)
      | ~ iext(uri_ex_q,X1,X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f142]) ).

fof(f142,plain,
    ~ ? [X0,X1] :
        ( iext(uri_ex_p,X0,X1)
        & iext(uri_ex_q,X1,X0) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f140]) ).

fof(f140,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X20,X21] :
        ( iext(uri_ex_p,X20,X21)
        & iext(uri_ex_q,X21,X20) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f139]) ).

fof(f139,conjecture,
    ? [X20,X21] :
      ( iext(uri_ex_p,X20,X21)
      & iext(uri_ex_q,X21,X20) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_conclusion_fullish_002_Existential_Blank_Nodes) ).

fof(f149,plain,
    iext(uri_ex_q,sK0,uri_ex_s),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f147]) ).

fof(f147,plain,
    ( iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,sK0)
    & iext(uri_ex_q,sK0,uri_ex_s) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f143,f146]) ).

fof(f146,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
        ( iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,X0)
        & iext(uri_ex_q,X0,uri_ex_s) )
   => ( iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,sK0)
      & iext(uri_ex_q,sK0,uri_ex_s) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f143,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,X0)
      & iext(uri_ex_q,X0,uri_ex_s) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f141]) ).

fof(f141,axiom,
    ? [X22] :
      ( iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,X22)
      & iext(uri_ex_q,X22,uri_ex_s) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_premise_fullish_002_Existential_Blank_Nodes) ).

fof(f150,plain,
    iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f147]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem    : SWB002+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 17:38:21 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.50  % (20464)dis-10_3:2_amm=sco:ep=RS:fsr=off:nm=10:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:st=3.0:i=11:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/11Mi)
% 0.19/0.50  % (20466)ott+21_1:1_erd=off:s2a=on:sac=on:sd=1:sgt=64:sos=on:ss=included:st=3.0:to=lpo:urr=on:i=99:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99Mi)
% 0.19/0.50  % (20455)lrs+10_1:2_br=off:nm=4:ss=included:urr=on:i=7:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 0.19/0.51  % (20472)dis+21_1:1_aac=none:abs=on:er=known:fde=none:fsr=off:nwc=5.0:s2a=on:s2at=4.0:sp=const_frequency:to=lpo:urr=ec_only:i=25:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/25Mi)
% 0.19/0.51  % (20457)lrs+10_1:32_br=off:nm=16:sd=2:ss=axioms:st=2.0:urr=on:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.19/0.51  % (20457)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.51  % (20452)dis+10_1:1_newcnf=on:sgt=8:sos=on:ss=axioms:to=lpo:urr=on:i=49:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/49Mi)
% 0.19/0.51  % (20475)lrs-11_1:1_nm=0:sac=on:sd=4:ss=axioms:st=3.0:i=24:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/24Mi)
% 0.19/0.51  % (20457)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.51  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.51  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.51  % (20457)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.51  % (20457)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.51  % (20457)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.51  % (20457)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.51  
% 0.19/0.51  % (20457)Memory used [KB]: 6012
% 0.19/0.51  % (20457)Time elapsed: 0.116 s
% 0.19/0.51  % (20457)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.19/0.51  % (20457)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.51  % (20457)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.51  % (20436)Success in time 0.171 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------