TSTP Solution File: SWB002+3 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : SWB002+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:37:26 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.51s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    9 (   3 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   15 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   11 (   5   ~;   2   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    9 (   0 sgn;   2   !;   5   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(testcase_conclusion_fullish_002_Existential_Blank_Nodes,conjecture,
    ? [X21,X22] :
      ( iext(uri_ex_p,X21,X22)
      & iext(uri_ex_q,X22,X21) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.027XjH0VuG/E---3.1_5223.p',testcase_conclusion_fullish_002_Existential_Blank_Nodes) ).

fof(testcase_premise_fullish_002_Existential_Blank_Nodes,axiom,
    ? [X23] :
      ( iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,X23)
      & iext(uri_ex_q,X23,uri_ex_s) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.027XjH0VuG/E---3.1_5223.p',testcase_premise_fullish_002_Existential_Blank_Nodes) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X21,X22] :
        ( iext(uri_ex_p,X21,X22)
        & iext(uri_ex_q,X22,X21) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[testcase_conclusion_fullish_002_Existential_Blank_Nodes]) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X24,X25] :
      ( ~ iext(uri_ex_p,X24,X25)
      | ~ iext(uri_ex_q,X25,X24) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ( iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,esk1_0)
    & iext(uri_ex_q,esk1_0,uri_ex_s) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_002_Existential_Blank_Nodes])]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ iext(uri_ex_p,X1,X2)
    | ~ iext(uri_ex_q,X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    iext(uri_ex_q,esk1_0,uri_ex_s),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem    : SWB002+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 20:51:37 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.48  Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.027XjH0VuG/E---3.1_5223.p
% 0.20/0.51  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.20/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # sh5l with pid 5303 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Result found by sh5l
% 0.20/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.20/0.51  # Search class: FGHNF-FSLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.51  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting G-E--_207_C41_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S4S with 163s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # G-E--_207_C41_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S4S with pid 5310 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Result found by G-E--_207_C41_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S4S
% 0.20/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.20/0.51  # Search class: FGHNF-FSLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.51  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting G-E--_207_C41_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S4S with 163s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # Preprocessing time       : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.51  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.51  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.51  # Parsed axioms                        : 140
% 0.20/0.51  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 41
% 0.20/0.51  # Initial clauses                      : 195
% 0.20/0.51  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 195
% 0.20/0.51  # Processed clauses                    : 13
% 0.20/0.51  # ...of these trivial                  : 3
% 0.20/0.51  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # ...remaining for further processing  : 10
% 0.20/0.51  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.20/0.51  # Generated clauses                    : 1
% 0.20/0.51  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Paramodulations                      : 1
% 0.20/0.51  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Total rewrite steps                  : 5
% 0.20/0.51  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.20/0.51  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.20/0.51  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.51  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.51  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.51  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.20/0.51  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51  # Current number of processed clauses  : 9
% 0.20/0.51  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 6
% 0.20/0.51  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.51  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.51  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 3
% 0.20/0.51  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 182
% 0.20/0.51  # ...number of literals in the above   : 726
% 0.20/0.51  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 0.20/0.51  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.20/0.51  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.20/0.51  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.20/0.51  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 11726
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51  # User time                : 0.014 s
% 0.20/0.51  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.51  # Total time               : 0.017 s
% 0.20/0.51  # Maximum resident set size: 2468 pages
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51  # User time                : 0.017 s
% 0.20/0.51  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.20/0.51  # Total time               : 0.023 s
% 0.20/0.51  # Maximum resident set size: 1816 pages
% 0.20/0.51  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------