TSTP Solution File: SWB002+1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SWB002+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:37:26 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.65s 0.62s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.65s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 15 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 11 ( 5 ~; 2 |; 4 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 0 sgn; 2 !; 5 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(testcase_conclusion_fullish_002_Existential_Blank_Nodes,conjecture,
? [X42,X43] :
( iext(uri_ex_p,X42,X43)
& iext(uri_ex_q,X43,X42) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.3GjWJV9ip1/E---3.1_30585.p',testcase_conclusion_fullish_002_Existential_Blank_Nodes) ).
fof(testcase_premise_fullish_002_Existential_Blank_Nodes,axiom,
? [X44] :
( iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,X44)
& iext(uri_ex_q,X44,uri_ex_s) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.3GjWJV9ip1/E---3.1_30585.p',testcase_premise_fullish_002_Existential_Blank_Nodes) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X42,X43] :
( iext(uri_ex_p,X42,X43)
& iext(uri_ex_q,X43,X42) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[testcase_conclusion_fullish_002_Existential_Blank_Nodes]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X1251,X1252] :
( ~ iext(uri_ex_p,X1251,X1252)
| ~ iext(uri_ex_q,X1252,X1251) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
( iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,esk192_0)
& iext(uri_ex_q,esk192_0,uri_ex_s) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_002_Existential_Blank_Nodes])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ iext(uri_ex_p,X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_ex_q,X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,esk192_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
iext(uri_ex_q,esk192_0,uri_ex_s),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : SWB002+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 20:22:28 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.50 Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.3GjWJV9ip1/E---3.1_30585.p
% 0.65/0.62 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.65/0.62 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.65/0.62 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.65/0.62 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.65/0.62 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.65/0.62 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.65/0.62 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.65/0.62 # G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with pid 30662 completed with status 0
% 0.65/0.62 # Result found by G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI
% 0.65/0.62 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.65/0.62 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.65/0.62 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.65/0.62 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.65/0.62 # Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.65/0.62 # partial match(1): FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.65/0.62 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 0.65/0.62 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 487s (1) cores
% 0.65/0.62 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 91s (1) cores
% 0.65/0.62 # Starting SAT001_CA_MinMin_p005000_rr with 82s (1) cores
% 0.65/0.62 # G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with pid 30676 completed with status 0
% 0.65/0.62 # Result found by G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI
% 0.65/0.62 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.65/0.62 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.65/0.62 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.65/0.62 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.65/0.62 # Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.65/0.62 # partial match(1): FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.65/0.62 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 0.65/0.62 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 487s (1) cores
% 0.65/0.62 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 91s (1) cores
% 0.65/0.62 # Preprocessing time : 0.017 s
% 0.65/0.62
% 0.65/0.62 # Proof found!
% 0.65/0.62 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.65/0.62 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.65/0.62 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.65/0.62 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.65/0.62 # Initial clauses : 1269
% 0.65/0.62 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 111
% 0.65/0.62 # Initial clauses in saturation : 1158
% 0.65/0.62 # Processed clauses : 137
% 0.65/0.62 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.65/0.62 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.65/0.62 # ...remaining for further processing : 137
% 0.65/0.62 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.65/0.62 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.65/0.62 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.65/0.62 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.65/0.62 # Generated clauses : 1
% 0.65/0.62 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.65/0.62 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.65/0.62 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.65/0.62 # Paramodulations : 1
% 0.65/0.62 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.65/0.62 # NegExts : 0
% 0.65/0.62 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.65/0.62 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.65/0.62 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.65/0.62 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.65/0.62 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.65/0.62 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.65/0.62 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.65/0.62 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.65/0.62 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.65/0.62 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.65/0.62 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.65/0.62 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.65/0.62 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.65/0.62 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.65/0.62 # Current number of processed clauses : 137
% 0.65/0.62 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 133
% 0.65/0.62 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.65/0.62 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.65/0.62 # Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.65/0.62 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1021
% 0.65/0.62 # ...number of literals in the above : 5055
% 0.65/0.62 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.65/0.62 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.65/0.62 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.65/0.62 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.65/0.62 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.65/0.62 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.65/0.62 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.65/0.62 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.65/0.62 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.65/0.62 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.65/0.62 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.65/0.62 # Termbank termtop insertions : 78842
% 0.65/0.62
% 0.65/0.62 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.65/0.62 # User time : 0.073 s
% 0.65/0.62 # System time : 0.010 s
% 0.65/0.62 # Total time : 0.083 s
% 0.65/0.62 # Maximum resident set size: 5736 pages
% 0.65/0.62
% 0.65/0.62 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.65/0.62 # User time : 0.123 s
% 0.65/0.62 # System time : 0.023 s
% 0.65/0.62 # Total time : 0.146 s
% 0.65/0.62 # Maximum resident set size: 2232 pages
% 0.65/0.62 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------