TSTP Solution File: SWB001+2 by Vampire-SAT---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem : SWB001+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Apr 30 15:41:31 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.15s 0.39s
% Output : Refutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 31 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 23 ( 9 ~; 7 |; 5 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 3 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 9 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f23,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f18,f20,f22]) ).
fof(f22,plain,
spl0_2,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f21]) ).
fof(f21,plain,
( $false
| spl0_2 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f17,f8]) ).
fof(f8,plain,
iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_r,uri_ex_p),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
( iext(uri_owl_someValuesFrom,uri_ex_r,uri_ex_d)
& iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_r,uri_ex_p)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_r,uri_owl_Restriction)
& iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c,uri_ex_r) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_premise_fullish_001_Subgraph_Entailment) ).
fof(f17,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_r,uri_ex_p)
| spl0_2 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f15]) ).
fof(f15,plain,
( spl0_2
<=> iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_r,uri_ex_p) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])]) ).
fof(f20,plain,
spl0_1,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f19]) ).
fof(f19,plain,
( $false
| spl0_1 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f13,f7]) ).
fof(f7,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_r,uri_owl_Restriction),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).
fof(f13,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_r,uri_owl_Restriction)
| spl0_1 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f11]) ).
fof(f11,plain,
( spl0_1
<=> iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_r,uri_owl_Restriction) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])]) ).
fof(f18,plain,
( ~ spl0_1
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f5,f15,f11]) ).
fof(f5,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_r,uri_ex_p)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_r,uri_owl_Restriction) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).
fof(f4,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_r,uri_ex_p)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_r,uri_owl_Restriction) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).
fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_r,uri_ex_p)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_r,uri_owl_Restriction) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).
fof(f1,conjecture,
( iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_r,uri_ex_p)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_r,uri_owl_Restriction) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_conclusion_fullish_001_Subgraph_Entailment) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.14 % Problem : SWB001+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.10/0.15 % Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.37 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % DateTime : Tue Apr 30 02:26:48 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.38 % (4895)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.15/0.39 % (4898)dis-2_2:3_amm=sco:anc=none:bce=on:fsr=off:gsp=on:nm=16:nwc=1.2:nicw=on:sac=on:sp=weighted_frequency_476 on theBenchmark for (476ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.39 % (4897)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.39 % (4901)dis+11_4:5_nm=4_216 on theBenchmark for (216ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.39 Detected minimum model sizes of [1,1,1]
% 0.15/0.39 Detected maximum model sizes of [2,1,2]
% 0.15/0.39 TRYING [1,1,1]
% 0.15/0.39 % (4898)First to succeed.
% 0.15/0.39 TRYING [2,1,1]
% 0.15/0.39 TRYING [2,1,2]
% 0.15/0.39 % (4899)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3:gsp=on:nm=4_470 on theBenchmark for (470ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.39 Cannot enumerate next child to try in an incomplete setup
% 0.15/0.39 % (4897)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (4897)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 % (4897)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.15/0.39 % (4897)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.39
% 0.15/0.39 % (4897)Memory used [KB]: 722
% 0.15/0.39 % (4897)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.39 % (4897)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.15/0.39 % (4901)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.15/0.39 % (4897)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 % (4897)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 Detected minimum model sizes of [1,1,1]
% 0.15/0.39 % (4900)dis+1_20_av=off:lcm=predicate:nm=2:nwc=2.0_396 on theBenchmark for (396ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.39 Detected maximum model sizes of [2,1,2]
% 0.15/0.39 TRYING [1,1,1]
% 0.15/0.39 % (4902)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2:si=on:rtra=on:rawr=on:rp=on:fmbksg=on_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.39 TRYING [2,1,1]
% 0.15/0.39 TRYING [2,1,2]
% 0.15/0.39 Cannot enumerate next child to try in an incomplete setup
% 0.15/0.39 % (4899)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (4899)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 % (4899)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.15/0.39 % (4899)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.39
% 0.15/0.39 % (4899)Memory used [KB]: 722
% 0.15/0.39 % (4899)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.39 % (4900)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.15/0.39 % (4899)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.15/0.39 % (4899)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 % (4899)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 % (4898)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.15/0.39 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.39 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.39 % (4898)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 % (4898)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.15/0.39 % (4898)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.15/0.39
% 0.15/0.39 % (4898)Memory used [KB]: 740
% 0.15/0.39 % (4898)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.39 % (4898)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.39 % (4898)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 % (4898)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 % (4895)Success in time 0.014 s
% 0.15/0.40 terminate called after throwing an instance of 'Lib::SystemFailException'
% 0.15/0.40 4895 Aborted by signal SIGABRT on /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.40 % (4895)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.40 % (4895)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.15/0.40 % (4895)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.40 % (4895)Termination phase: Unknown
% 0.15/0.40
% 0.15/0.40 % (4895)Memory used [KB]: 407
% 0.15/0.40 % (4895)Time elapsed: 0.025 s
% 0.15/0.40 % (4895)Instructions burned: 41 (million)
% 0.15/0.40 % (4895)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.40 % (4895)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.40 Version : Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.15/0.40 ???
% 0.15/0.40 ???
% 0.15/0.40 ???
% 0.15/0.40 ???
% 0.15/0.40 ???
% 0.15/0.40 ???
% 0.15/0.40 ???
% 0.15/0.40 ???
% 0.15/0.40 ???
% 0.15/0.40 ???
% 0.15/0.40 ???
% 0.15/0.40 ???
% 0.15/0.40 ???
% 0.15/0.40 ???
% 0.15/0.40 ???
% 0.15/0.40 ???
% 0.15/0.40 ???
% 0.15/0.40 ???
% 0.15/0.40 ???
% 0.15/0.40 ???
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------