TSTP Solution File: SWB001+2 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SWB001+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:00:11 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 2.02s 1.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (   3 unt;  10 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   11 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    8 (   3   ~;   1   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    3 (   1   >;   2   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   9 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (;   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ iext > #nlpp > uri_rdfs_subClassOf > uri_rdf_type > uri_owl_someValuesFrom > uri_owl_onProperty > uri_owl_Restriction > uri_ex_r > uri_ex_p > uri_ex_d > uri_ex_c

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(uri_rdf_type,type,
    uri_rdf_type: $i ).

tff(uri_owl_onProperty,type,
    uri_owl_onProperty: $i ).

tff(uri_ex_c,type,
    uri_ex_c: $i ).

tff(uri_ex_p,type,
    uri_ex_p: $i ).

tff(uri_owl_Restriction,type,
    uri_owl_Restriction: $i ).

tff(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,type,
    uri_rdfs_subClassOf: $i ).

tff(iext,type,
    iext: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(uri_ex_r,type,
    uri_ex_r: $i ).

tff(uri_owl_someValuesFrom,type,
    uri_owl_someValuesFrom: $i ).

tff(uri_ex_d,type,
    uri_ex_d: $i ).

tff(f_35,axiom,
    ( iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c,uri_ex_r)
    & iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_r,uri_owl_Restriction)
    & iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_r,uri_ex_p)
    & iext(uri_owl_someValuesFrom,uri_ex_r,uri_ex_d) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_premise_fullish_001_Subgraph_Entailment) ).

tff(f_28,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_r,uri_owl_Restriction)
      & iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_r,uri_ex_p) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_conclusion_fullish_001_Subgraph_Entailment) ).

tff(c_8,plain,
    iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_r,uri_owl_Restriction),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_35]) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_r,uri_ex_p),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_35]) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ( ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_r,uri_ex_p)
    | ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_r,uri_owl_Restriction) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_28]) ).

tff(c_12,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_8,c_6,c_2]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : SWB001+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 18:21:07 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.02/1.43  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.02/1.44  
% 2.02/1.44  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.17/1.48  
% 2.17/1.48  Inference rules
% 2.17/1.48  ----------------------
% 2.17/1.48  #Ref     : 0
% 2.17/1.48  #Sup     : 0
% 2.17/1.48  #Fact    : 0
% 2.17/1.48  #Define  : 0
% 2.17/1.48  #Split   : 0
% 2.17/1.48  #Chain   : 0
% 2.17/1.48  #Close   : 0
% 2.17/1.48  
% 2.17/1.48  Ordering : KBO
% 2.17/1.48  
% 2.17/1.48  Simplification rules
% 2.17/1.48  ----------------------
% 2.17/1.48  #Subsume      : 4
% 2.17/1.48  #Demod        : 2
% 2.17/1.48  #Tautology    : 0
% 2.17/1.48  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 2.17/1.48  #BackRed      : 0
% 2.17/1.48  
% 2.17/1.48  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.17/1.48  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 2.17/1.48  
% 2.17/1.48  Timing (in seconds)
% 2.17/1.48  ----------------------
% 2.17/1.48  Preprocessing        : 0.36
% 2.17/1.48  Parsing              : 0.20
% 2.17/1.48  CNF conversion       : 0.01
% 2.17/1.48  Main loop            : 0.05
% 2.17/1.48  Inferencing          : 0.00
% 2.17/1.48  Reduction            : 0.02
% 2.17/1.48  Demodulation         : 0.02
% 2.17/1.48  BG Simplification    : 0.01
% 2.17/1.48  Subsumption          : 0.02
% 2.17/1.48  Abstraction          : 0.00
% 2.17/1.48  MUC search           : 0.00
% 2.17/1.48  Cooper               : 0.00
% 2.17/1.48  Total                : 0.46
% 2.17/1.48  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 2.17/1.48  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 2.17/1.48  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 2.17/1.48  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------