TSTP Solution File: SEV476^1 by Vampire---4.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.9
% Problem  : SEV476^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire %s %d THM

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 16:04:02 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.38s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (   7 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  148 (  35 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  197 (  19   ~;  10   |;   7   &; 153   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   38 (  38   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   10 (   7 usr;   2 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   56 (   0   ^  50   !;   6   ?;  56   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_6,type,
    sK0: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    'const/sets/SUBSET': 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > ( X0 > $o ) > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    'const/sets/FINITE': 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    'const/sets/DIFF': 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > ( X0 > $o ) > X0 > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    vEPSILON: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > X0 ) ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    sK1: sK0 > $o ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    sK2: sK0 > $o ).

thf(func_def_10,type,
    ph4: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(f28,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f25]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    $true != $true,
    inference(superposition,[],[f18,f24]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ! [X0: sK0 > $o] :
      ( ( 'const/sets/FINITE' @ sK0 @ ( 'const/sets/DIFF' @ sK0 @ sK1 @ X0 ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f23]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ! [X0: sK0 > $o] :
      ( ( $true != $true )
      | ( ( 'const/sets/FINITE' @ sK0 @ ( 'const/sets/DIFF' @ sK0 @ sK1 @ X0 ) )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f22,f19]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( 'const/sets/FINITE' @ sK0 @ sK1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( 'const/sets/FINITE' @ sK0 @ sK1 ) )
    & ( ( 'const/sets/FINITE' @ sK0 @ ( 'const/sets/DIFF' @ sK0 @ sK1 @ sK2 ) )
     != $true ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f12,f15]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $tType,X1: X0 > $o,X2: X0 > $o] :
        ( ( ( 'const/sets/FINITE' @ X0 @ X1 )
          = $true )
        & ( ( 'const/sets/FINITE' @ X0 @ ( 'const/sets/DIFF' @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 ) )
         != $true ) )
   => ( ( $true
        = ( 'const/sets/FINITE' @ sK0 @ sK1 ) )
      & ( ( 'const/sets/FINITE' @ sK0 @ ( 'const/sets/DIFF' @ sK0 @ sK1 @ sK2 ) )
       != $true ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ? [X0: $tType,X1: X0 > $o,X2: X0 > $o] :
      ( ( ( 'const/sets/FINITE' @ X0 @ X1 )
        = $true )
      & ( ( 'const/sets/FINITE' @ X0 @ ( 'const/sets/DIFF' @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 ) )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: $tType,X1: X0 > $o,X2: X0 > $o] :
        ( ( ( 'const/sets/FINITE' @ X0 @ X1 )
          = $true )
       => ( ( 'const/sets/FINITE' @ X0 @ ( 'const/sets/DIFF' @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 ) )
          = $true ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: $tType,X1: X0 > $o,X2: X0 > $o] :
        ( ( 'const/sets/FINITE' @ X0 @ X1 )
       => ( 'const/sets/FINITE' @ X0 @ ( 'const/sets/DIFF' @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0: $tType,X1: X0 > $o,X2: X0 > $o] :
        ( ( 'const/sets/FINITE' @ X0 @ X1 )
       => ( 'const/sets/FINITE' @ X0 @ ( 'const/sets/DIFF' @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f3]) ).

thf(f3,conjecture,
    ! [X0: $tType,X1: X0 > $o,X2: X0 > $o] :
      ( ( 'const/sets/FINITE' @ X0 @ X1 )
     => ( 'const/sets/FINITE' @ X0 @ ( 'const/sets/DIFF' @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','thm/sets/FINITE_DIFF_') ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ! [X0: $tType,X2: X0 > $o,X1: X0 > $o] :
      ( ( ( 'const/sets/FINITE' @ X0 @ X1 )
       != $true )
      | ( ( 'const/sets/FINITE' @ X0 @ ( 'const/sets/DIFF' @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 ) )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f21]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ! [X0: $tType,X2: X0 > $o,X1: X0 > $o] :
      ( ( ( 'const/sets/FINITE' @ X0 @ X1 )
       != $true )
      | ( ( 'const/sets/FINITE' @ X0 @ ( 'const/sets/DIFF' @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 ) )
        = $true )
      | ( $true != $true ) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f17,f20]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ! [X0: $tType,X2: X0 > $o,X1: X0 > $o] :
      ( ( 'const/sets/SUBSET' @ X0 @ ( 'const/sets/DIFF' @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X1 )
      = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ! [X0: $tType,X1: X0 > $o,X2: X0 > $o] :
      ( ( 'const/sets/SUBSET' @ X0 @ ( 'const/sets/DIFF' @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X1 )
      = $true ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ! [X0: $tType,X1: X0 > $o,X2: X0 > $o] : ( 'const/sets/SUBSET' @ X0 @ ( 'const/sets/DIFF' @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X1 ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0: $tType,X1: X0 > $o,X2: X0 > $o] : ( 'const/sets/SUBSET' @ X0 @ ( 'const/sets/DIFF' @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','thm/sets/SUBSET_DIFF_') ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ! [X0: $tType,X2: X0 > $o,X1: X0 > $o] :
      ( ( ( 'const/sets/SUBSET' @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
       != $true )
      | ( ( 'const/sets/FINITE' @ X0 @ X1 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( 'const/sets/FINITE' @ X0 @ X2 )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ! [X0: $tType,X1: X0 > $o,X2: X0 > $o] :
      ( ( ( 'const/sets/FINITE' @ X0 @ X1 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( 'const/sets/FINITE' @ X0 @ X2 )
       != $true )
      | ( ( 'const/sets/SUBSET' @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f13]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ! [X0: $tType,X1: X0 > $o,X2: X0 > $o] :
      ( ( ( 'const/sets/FINITE' @ X0 @ X1 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( 'const/sets/SUBSET' @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
       != $true )
      | ( ( 'const/sets/FINITE' @ X0 @ X2 )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ! [X0: $tType,X1: X0 > $o,X2: X0 > $o] :
      ( ( ( ( 'const/sets/SUBSET' @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
          = $true )
        & ( ( 'const/sets/FINITE' @ X0 @ X2 )
          = $true ) )
     => ( ( 'const/sets/FINITE' @ X0 @ X1 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ! [X0: $tType,X1: X0 > $o,X2: X0 > $o] :
      ( ( ( 'const/sets/SUBSET' @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
        & ( 'const/sets/FINITE' @ X0 @ X2 ) )
     => ( 'const/sets/FINITE' @ X0 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0: $tType,X1: X0 > $o,X2: X0 > $o] :
      ( ( ( 'const/sets/SUBSET' @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
        & ( 'const/sets/FINITE' @ X0 @ X2 ) )
     => ( 'const/sets/FINITE' @ X0 @ X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','thm/sets/FINITE_SUBSET_') ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ( ( 'const/sets/FINITE' @ sK0 @ ( 'const/sets/DIFF' @ sK0 @ sK1 @ sK2 ) )
   != $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : SEV476^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command    : run_vampire %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Fri Jun 21 18:58:39 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.12/0.35  This is a TH1_THM_NEQ_NAR problem
% 0.12/0.35  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.35  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire_ho --cores 7 --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -m 16384 -t 300
% 0.21/0.37  % (5859)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 0.21/0.37  % (5861)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/27Mi)
% 0.21/0.37  % (5858)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 0.21/0.37  % (5865)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 0.21/0.37  % (5864)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/275Mi)
% 0.21/0.37  % (5863)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.21/0.37  % (5862)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.21/0.37  % Exception at run slice level
% 0.21/0.37  User error: Vampire does not support full TH1. This benchmark is either outside of the TH1 fragment, or outside of the fragment supported by Vampire
% 0.21/0.38  % (5864)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.21/0.38  % (5864)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.38  % (5864)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 11aac991b on 2023-10-04 16:26:07 +0200)
% 0.21/0.38  % (5864)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.21/0.38  
% 0.21/0.38  
% 0.21/0.38  % (5864)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.21/0.38  % (5864)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.38  % (5864)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.21/0.38  % (5864)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.38  % (5864)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.38  % (5862)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.38  % (5862)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.38  % (5862)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 11aac991b on 2023-10-04 16:26:07 +0200)
% 0.21/0.38  % (5862)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.38  % (5862)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.21/0.38  
% 0.21/0.38  % (5862)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.21/0.38  % (5861)First to succeed.
% 0.21/0.38  % (5862)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.38  % (5862)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.21/0.38  % (5862)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.38  % (5862)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.38  % (5859)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.38  % (5859)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.38  % (5859)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 11aac991b on 2023-10-04 16:26:07 +0200)
% 0.21/0.38  % (5859)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.38  % (5859)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.21/0.38  
% 0.21/0.38  % (5859)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.21/0.38  % (5859)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.38  % (5859)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.21/0.38  % (5859)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.38  % (5859)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.38  % (5861)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.21/0.38  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.38  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.38  % (5861)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.38  % (5861)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 11aac991b on 2023-10-04 16:26:07 +0200)
% 0.21/0.38  % (5861)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.21/0.38  
% 0.21/0.38  % (5861)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.21/0.38  % (5861)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.38  % (5861)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.21/0.38  % (5861)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.38  % (5861)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.38  % (5851)Success in time 0.021 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------